DISQUS

According to SourceWatch, a project of the Center for Media & Democracy,

Anyone who criticizes tobacco, alcohol, fatty foods or soda pop is likely to come under attack from the CCF [Center For Consumer Freedom.] Its enemies list has included such diverse groups and individuals as...the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; the American Medical Association; the Arthritis Foundation; the Consumer Federation of America; New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani; the Harvard School of Public Health; the Marin Institute for the Prevention of Alcohol and Other Drug Problems; the National Association of High School Principals; the National Safety Council . . . Ralph Nader's group, Public Citizen; and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

A quick tour of the CCF website reveals article after article dismissing reputable scientific studies that demonstrate the dangers of high fat, trans fats, high sugar, processed food, meat-consumption diets, the dangers of high mercury levels in fish, etc., and attacking advocates of healthy lifestyles."

One of CCF's favorite targets is Peta and other animal rights groups who cut into the "junk food" profit margins of CCF's clients.

The disinformation put out by the CCF flies in the face of both science and common sense. But that should be no surprise, since the goal of CCF is not to promote consumer freedom, but to increase the profit-margins of their corporate clients.

Το Ρικ ελεγχει το επίγειο σημα της ΕΡΤ World και οχι το δορυφορικο.Αρα για να αποτρεψει το Μεγκα απ το να μην δειξει την εκπομπη για την επιλογη του Ελληνικου τραγουδιου στην Eurovision θα πρεπει να κοψει το σημα απο τους δορυφορους Hotbird και ΕλλαςΣατ κατι που ασφαλως δεν μπορει να το κανει!

can anyone actually speak or write in english anymore? I can give on the text shorthand; but honestly - dis,dat, den?

its not so much the first man on k2 that deserves credit but that he died attempting to save the lives of others that deserves recommendation. guess thats why they call then unsung

sitting around bitching hasnt done us any good and its not gonna start now, makin the peoples voices heard has worked for the icelandic (which were not too far away from in any terms) and its workin for the french. our biggest mistake was to let the likes of mr odea and mr power into the positions they hold now. thousands of jobs have disappeared from our city in a few months and a lot more to go, personally i think the city deserves a lot better

good to see were off to a flying start, lets hope mr power doesnt bring this down to the ranks of the numerous other impotent political committees more interested in soundbytes than gettin something done for the city

apsolutly, what he ended up giving attempting to save lives makes the majority of the choices seem trivial

Responsible business leaders are coming to the conclusion that profit-margins are not the be-all and end-all. Many are changing-- if not their views on animals, the environment, and human rights around the world---- at least their policies and actions in those areas. After all, it's not in the interest of business to alienate customers who are becoming more and more concerned over the kind of cruel disregard for others that permeates industry focussed only on bottom-lines.

If Obama can appoint good people like Sunstein to offset the damage done by the Bush Administration's catering to industry and lobbyists, and push business --for whatever reason -- to change its abusive ways, then more power to him -- maybe there's hope for us all yet!

It seems like the council is adding an unnecessary step to this process. Why not let Dryden remain interim city manager until a permanent replacement is hired? Isn't George Monk being paid to stay on as an advisor until a new permanent city manager is found? Surely he and Chief Dryden can handle things until then.

This is actually counter-productive without a Yahoo feeback loop.

Note that I'm a serious entrepreneur as I invest my very own money (you can't get more serious than this, obviously). And that's exactly the reason I will never throw 250 USD per month at you for being part of a questionable platform when I can actually attract even better VCs and AIs for free.

You make exactly the same fault like the DEMO guys. They've lost against TC50 as they selected companies based on silly charges (10k), not merits, ideas, ability.

Investors: In which company would you rather invest: In one that throws away its money for the search of more money (to throw it away as soon as they have it) or one that rather invests its money into product development? Pretty clear.

i hope they put him away forever!!!!!!!!!!!

For long time Fox is been involve in politic
Fox use his influence to shape and send message to all about what they want

Fox is NOT journalism they just a buntch of people try to controle the point on view of the people

That shouldn't be tolerate but the gouvernement don't interfere as per they benefit from it.

It need to stop and NOW before Fox do something that will even get the situation worst as it is already

I care as much for you fans and what you think as a festering bowl of dog snot! If you combined the IQ's of all of you it might be enough to tie a shoelace if you didn't drool all over yourselves first! But you will still give me your money! Ahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

Great Job Eagle Tribune!!! You print the quote from the thug regarding the police harassing him, way to reinforce his negative behavior. Why didn't you ask him why he was pulled out of line 2 times for yelling & swearing at the police and staff. I thought the police used great restraint by not arresting him and letting him finish his graduation. Also, asked him about the gun that he has on his myspace page. This thug has been involved in numerous incidents at and around the high school. I give him 2 weeks in the marines, they wont be as nice as the police.

I'm just not sure that it makes sense to talk of Presidents as "shepherding the economy" in the first place, as if nothing else mattered (Federal Reserve chairman, Congress, foreign oil producers, unexpected economic developments like the Internet, and a million other things).

Moreover, although I'm not an economist, my hunch is that Carter's appointment of Paul Volcker to the Federal Reserve had more effect on the national economy during the 1979-1987 years than anything Reagan did. And Reagan's appointment of Alan Greenspan in 1987 had more effect on the national economy in the 1990s than anything Clinton specifically did.

So how does Bartels account for that? Should we attribute the Reagan years to Carter, and the Clinton years to Reagan? (If, that is, one is going to be so simplistic as to attribute given years to a President in the first place.)

OK, but I still think that there are far too few data points (what, 11 Presidents?) to come with anything meaningful one way or the other. It's the equivalent of Ptolemaic cycles -- sophisticated but irrelevant calculations.

get a life.
[quote comment="12366"]OTHER TALENTS, NOT INCLUDED IN UR LIST.

GOALKEEPERS:
Costil (20), Hart (20),Alnwick (20), Hartock (20), Leutwiler (18) Fabianski (22), Schmeichel (20),
Schust (21), Neuer (21), Akinfeev (21), Carson (22),
Ustari (21), Curci (22), Mustafa (18), Erik Dahlin (18), LLoris (20).

DEFENDERS:
Drenthe (20), Nilgarna (19), Sidnei (18), Sakho (17), Agger (22), C.Zapata (21), Da Costa (21), Opare (17),
R.Albiol (22), A. Ferdinand (22), Clichy (22), A.Traore (18) De Jong (22), Dagaka (22), V.Borre (20), Bale (18)

MIDFIELDERS:
Wijnaldum (16) A.Turan (20), Taarabt (18), Lindgren (22), K.P Boaten (20), M.Fernandes (21) Huddlestone (20), Lennon (20) , De Guzman (20), Aissati (19), J.Moutinho (21), Kuzmanovic (20), (), Defour (19), L.Lima (19), Fabio C.(19), Ireland (19), Sunny (19),
Celsinho (19), Hetemaj (20), Woods (17), Ninis (17), Azpilicueta (18), Koman (18), Anita (18), Hamsik (20),
A.Vasquez (20), Marcos (20), Buonanotte (19), Lucas (20), Asier (20), De Mul (21), N´Zogbia (21), Guardado (21), Trejo (21), Nicolita (22), Barnetta (22).

ATTACKERS:
Batuhan (16), Zeefuik(17), Matsoukas (17), Forestieri (17), Sinclair(18), Sulejmani (18), Ben Sahar (18), A.Traore (18), Beerens (19), Bisewar (19), Lindfield (19), J.Mata (19), Derdiyok (19), Di Maria (19), Ben Arfa (20), Menez (20) ,Mirallas (20),Remy (20), Issiar Dia (20), J.Pablo Pino (20), Gervinho (20), Aubameyang (20), Vonlanthen (21), R.Garcia (21), Agbonlahor(21), El Zhar (21), Jerome (21), Mitea (21), Kalou (22), Gomis (22), Bakkal (22), Soldado (22), A.Young (22), R.Sobis (22).

Im sure most of this players are unknown to most of u but search for them and u will learn about them.

Uve missed alots of Talents...But a good video. :d

I would not include Milner or Suarez in the Young Talents list...[/quote] :)>-[/quote]

Seems to me the real ideologues are the people pushing a spurious correlation that disappears if you shift the analysis one year in either direction.

Well, that should give you pause -- rather than just accepting it as a fact of nature and urging women to wait, think more deeply for a second here. For women, the prime childbearing years are the late teens. Childbearing ability goes down after that, and by age 35, childbearing is way more dangerous -- fertility is down, risk of Down's syndrome is up, etc. There's something deeply wrong about a system that makes women choose between 1) having children at the biologically appropriate time, vs. 2) a heavy financial penalty.

Bryan’s insistence that he’d rather risk the ruin of his daughter’s potential than have her go childless strikes me as perverse. I simply can’t make any sense of it.

Really? You might disagree with it, but you can't even figure it out? A moment's rumination on Darwin's theory of evolution might do the trick (i.e., people have an instinct to see their genes preserved).

Well, the better way to restate Ross' argument would be this:

(1) It is permissible for parents to make their children use their bodies in many ways (to study, to mow the yard, to clean up the dishes, to clean their rooms, etc., etc.).

(2) Sex is morally indistinguishable from any other "use" of the human body.

(3) If (2) is true, then there would be nothing wrong with parents asking their children to engage in sexual activities. (This wouldn't have to involve the parents themselves; say the parents told one child to masturbate the other child -- doing the other child a "great kindness" in Will's words).

(4) If (3) seems repulsive, as it does to many people, then maybe you should rethink this whole argument that sex is morally indistinguishable from any other "use" of the human body.

(5) More than that, once you start thinking about how sex is different from almost all other routine uses of the human body (for example, its extreme impact on the emotions and hormones, its potent power to cement together relationships or to break them apart, etc.), then you might end up somewhere other than strict libertinism.

(I say "libertinism" because libertarianism would only mean, as a theory of government, that the government shouldn't regulate sex; libertarianism doesn't in any way require you to take the moral stance that all handjobs are always a sweet favor.)

Some of a kid I know... he has some good lebowski ones.
http://picasaweb.google.com/Rofron/Pumpkins

I’m trying to draw attention to the fact that the basic structure of the global system of border enforcement and legal exclusion from labor market participation badly disadvantages millions and possibly billions.

Billions? Come on. If billions of illiterate and impoverished people immigrated to America, they wouldn't all suddenly have a median income of $30,000. They'd just drag down America to their level. What's really keeping them down is not their inability to migrate to America, but the lack of good government, property rights, intellectual capital (i.e., the formation of businesses), and possibly cultural habits, in their own countries.