http://disqus.com/people/d1b47971feee9e8f1a6a847b4f0fed79/enThu, 03 Apr 2008 10:34:27 -0000http://mathewingram.disqus.com/is_paidcontent_really_a_8220blog8221_at_all_02/#comment-278971"But I also find that <a href="http://PaidContent.org" rel="nofollow">PaidContent.org</a> isn’t that… well, interesting..."<br><br>oh puh-leez. if that were a description of this blog, we'd be in full agreement. but it's so wrong and simply a smear.<br><br>i suppose if you enjoy a website where its writers call other people "wanker" and "cun*," then you know where to click. but rafat and his team have built a web site that's both informative and engaging. if you find it less than thrilling, that's your problem. but your snark is ill-considered, silly and cheap. then again, i don't expect any less from a arrington fanboy.K. ShaheedinFri, 28 Mar 2008 23:06:24 -0000http://mathewingram.disqus.com/memo_to_ebay_just_sell_skype_already_71/#comment-297223as a reader, what i would like most of all is for some smart reporter to actually do the legwork and check out the rumor. is any of this true, for pete's sake? i mean, are we all going to comment upon comments upon comments - upon RUMORS? jeesh, this is getting out of controlK. ShaheedinThu, 03 Apr 2008 10:34:27 -0000