Hello!
The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.
Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
K. Shaheedin
Is this you? Claim Profile »
1 year ago
in Is PaidContent really a “blog” at all? on Mathew's comments
"But I also find that PaidContent.org isn’t that… well, interesting..."
oh puh-leez. if that were a description of this blog, we'd be in full agreement. but it's so wrong and simply a smear.
i suppose if you enjoy a website where its writers call other people "wanker" and "cun*," then you know where to click. but rafat and his team have built a web site that's both informative and engaging. if you find it less than thrilling, that's your problem. but your snark is ill-considered, silly and cheap. then again, i don't expect any less from a arrington fanboy.
oh puh-leez. if that were a description of this blog, we'd be in full agreement. but it's so wrong and simply a smear.
i suppose if you enjoy a website where its writers call other people "wanker" and "cun*," then you know where to click. but rafat and his team have built a web site that's both informative and engaging. if you find it less than thrilling, that's your problem. but your snark is ill-considered, silly and cheap. then again, i don't expect any less from a arrington fanboy.
1 reply
interesting. I didn't say it wasn't informative, and if you read the
whole thing you can see that I think highly of Rafat and what he's
been able to accomplish. I fail to see how any of that makes me an
"Arrington fanboy."
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Disqus