<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for commonsensepoliticstoday</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-51e1ae5a" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/commonsensepoliticstoday/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:39:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Rebecca Channels Ma Barker: But It Depends On What You Think the Meaning of &amp;#8216;Dirty&amp;#8217; Is</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/bush-administration/17376/rebecca-channels-ma-barker-but-it-depends-on-what-the-meaning-of-dirty-is/#comment-109805</link><description>Don Quijote, many of us who are democrats, the young coming into the party especially, are democrats because we believe that the party, despite its faults, represent more the idealisitc, humanistic, and decent approach to politics.  We have hated and despised Rovian, Machiavellian tactics, and demand to see a change.  If the democratic party now takes up the Clintons' Rovian tactics on the basis that it's effective, please expect defection, or reversion to apathy.  I for one will be sitting out the election unless someone else appears on the ticket if Billary gets the dem nomination.  Their repulsive tactics have opened my eyes to who they are, and I feel manipulated into having supported them in the past.  "Winning," truly, is not everything, if you sell your soul and your grandma's, your dog's, whatevers and whosevers, for power.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">commonsensepoliticstoday</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:39:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>