<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for chucktryon</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/chucktryon/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:40:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: teaching new media subjectivities</title><link>http://digitaldigs.disqus.com/teaching_new_media_subjectivities/#comment-5061451</link><description>I like your reading of Wesch's article.  I think the "crisis" narrative needs to be placed in a larger historical context in order to recognize these issues as ongoing.  In fact, one of the more vivid moments in &lt;i&gt;Berkeley in the Sixties&lt;/i&gt; focuses on just this sort of crisis, as many leaders of the Free Speech Movement felt alienated from an education that was preparing them for participation in what Eisenhower had called the "military-industrial complex."  In other words, I think we are always asking/answering this question of "relevance," and if we're not, then maybe we're in the wrong profession. But it does beg the question as to whether "crisis" is the correct term for it, if in fact, it is an ongoing, changing issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding the "subjectivities" rather than "subjects" argument, I think you're basically right.  My research is not in rhet-comp, but it is informed by some of the same cultural studies theory.  That's not to suggest that we're ahead of the curve so much as to point out a place of intersection, a reason why Wesch's approach might be particularly seductive for those of us in the digital humanities (or related fields).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:40:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best of 2008: These Miracles Work</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/best_of_2008_these_miracles_work/#comment-4332127</link><description>I think that comment was probably more about my own tendency to learn to appreciate better albums over time.  I gave &lt;i&gt;Stay Positive&lt;/i&gt; a relatively attentive listen yesterday and found myself really digging it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:27:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best of 2008: These Miracles Work</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/best_of_2008_these_miracles_work/#comment-4291200</link><description>Great review.  I like this CD quite a bit.  I've been listening to these guys almost non-stop on my iPod for the last month or so.  I'll admit that I'm still partial to &lt;i&gt;Boys and Girls in America&lt;/i&gt; but that it also takes me months to really appreciate most albums.  Having spent a lot of time in Indiana (and as a big fan of &lt;i&gt;Breaking Away&lt;/i&gt;, which is about another group of Cutters), I do have an incredible soft spot for "One for the Cutters," though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:27:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Liddy Dole, homophobe, has to go</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/liddy_dole_homophobe_has_to_go/#comment-3203653</link><description>I live in Fayetteville and received a flier that reinforced many of the assertions in Dole's ads.  Not only was the flier homophobic but it also implied that Hagan would be imposing an atheistic agenda that would result in the banning of Christmas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just another reason why Hagan deserves everyone's support.  And, yes, from what I can tell, Hagan is in pretty good shape as long as everyone continues to work hard.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:16:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: EST, aka Even Suckers Transform</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_est_aka_even_suckers_transform/#comment-3017458</link><description>Faulkner was hip enough by 1962 that it would seem like the Euro girl would be reading a more recent novel.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:58:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: EST, aka Even Suckers Transform</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_est_aka_even_suckers_transform/#comment-3017432</link><description>It certainly seems like somebody's dream.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:55:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: EST, aka Even Suckers Transform</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_est_aka_even_suckers_transform/#comment-3017344</link><description>Yes, I keep expecting Roger Mason to pop in smugging some microfiche in the belly of a small statue.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:43:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: EST, aka Even Suckers Transform</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_est_aka_even_suckers_transform/#comment-3017057</link><description>I hear the Jon Hamm character is not particularly well-written.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomwatson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:34:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: EST, aka Even Suckers Transform</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_est_aka_even_suckers_transform/#comment-3017019</link><description>Ad for The Day the Earth Stood Still isn't terribly promising.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:33:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: EST, aka Even Suckers Transform</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_est_aka_even_suckers_transform/#comment-3016981</link><description>I was thinking maybe Douglas Fairbanks as directed by Wes Anderson, which is more or less the same thing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:29:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: EST, aka Even Suckers Transform</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_est_aka_even_suckers_transform/#comment-3016974</link><description>Well, they are European girls, mostly [/sarcasm].</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:28:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: EST, aka Even Suckers Transform</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_est_aka_even_suckers_transform/#comment-3016905</link><description>Hi everyone...recovering from a long weekend trip to Austin so I'm a little late to the party.  Thanks, Tom, for the additional Twitter reminder.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:26:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: &amp;#8220;Tears rise in the heart and gather in the eyes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_8220tears_rise_in_the_heart_and_gather_in_the_eyes8221/#comment-1583528</link><description>Yeah, that turned things up a notch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:56:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: &amp;#8220;Tears rise in the heart and gather in the eyes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_8220tears_rise_in_the_heart_and_gather_in_the_eyes8221/#comment-1583525</link><description>They're kind of like the twins from The Shining.  They seem vaguely medicated or hypnotized or something.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:56:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: &amp;#8220;Tears rise in the heart and gather in the eyes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_8220tears_rise_in_the_heart_and_gather_in_the_eyes8221/#comment-1583502</link><description>Yeah, guessing that wouldn't have happened, especially in 1962.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:52:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: &amp;#8220;Tears rise in the heart and gather in the eyes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_8220tears_rise_in_the_heart_and_gather_in_the_eyes8221/#comment-1583484</link><description>Yep pretty much</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomwatson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:49:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: &amp;#8220;Tears rise in the heart and gather in the eyes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_8220tears_rise_in_the_heart_and_gather_in_the_eyes8221/#comment-1583473</link><description>Having this meeting on Good Friday is a little over the top.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:48:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: &amp;#8220;Tears rise in the heart and gather in the eyes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_8220tears_rise_in_the_heart_and_gather_in_the_eyes8221/#comment-1583441</link><description>Oh, good point.  That probably would have been pretty chilly, no?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:43:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: &amp;#8220;Tears rise in the heart and gather in the eyes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_8220tears_rise_in_the_heart_and_gather_in_the_eyes8221/#comment-1583252</link><description>Yeah, this episode isn't quite working.  The "American Airlines is about the future" bit is interesting, especially given the state of the airline industry today.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:40:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: &amp;#8220;Tears rise in the heart and gather in the eyes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_8220tears_rise_in_the_heart_and_gather_in_the_eyes8221/#comment-1582876</link><description>Yeah, then there's the travel/commute - see my comments above. Sloppy research. They're obsessed with costumes and sets, but always kinda lame with the cultural references and authenticity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomwatson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:23:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: &amp;#8220;Tears rise in the heart and gather in the eyes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_8220tears_rise_in_the_heart_and_gather_in_the_eyes8221/#comment-1582869</link><description>There are things that are pretty authentic in this series - and others that aren't - and the Catholic stuff belongs to the latter. As does the travel in the show. Don takes the train - except for the times when he drives in and parks in front of the office on Madison Avenue so he can have sex in the car. Right. And...the Ossining train runs through Katonah (from last year) - riiiight.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomwatson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:22:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: &amp;#8220;Tears rise in the heart and gather in the eyes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_8220tears_rise_in_the_heart_and_gather_in_the_eyes8221/#comment-1582864</link><description>Yeah, the show seems a little off the mark tonight.  And maybe in other episodes as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:21:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: &amp;#8220;Tears rise in the heart and gather in the eyes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_8220tears_rise_in_the_heart_and_gather_in_the_eyes8221/#comment-1582850</link><description>It did have "bosom" in the title, after all...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomwatson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:20:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: &amp;#8220;Tears rise in the heart and gather in the eyes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_8220tears_rise_in_the_heart_and_gather_in_the_eyes8221/#comment-1582830</link><description>Yeah, I thought it was pretty Catholic-lite.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:17:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mad Men: &amp;#8220;Tears rise in the heart and gather in the eyes&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://newcritics.disqus.com/mad_men_8220tears_rise_in_the_heart_and_gather_in_the_eyes8221/#comment-1582827</link><description>I wouldn't think so.  That is odd....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chucktryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:16:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>