<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for chrisphin</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/chrisphin/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/chrisphin/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 06:34:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The things we think and do not say: the future of writing about film online</title><link>https://filmstories.co.uk/features/the-things-we-think-and-do-not-say-the-future-of-writing-about-film-online/#comment-6197446354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Norman is a very handsome bunny. And you’re a very smart and kind man.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 06:34:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RØDECaster Pro Multitrack - How It Works (And More Features From Update 1.1.0 Explained)</title><link>https://www.rode.com/blog/all/RODECaster-Pro-Multitrack#comment-4377759039</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes – this is the right answer! I heard back from the (very helpful) RØDE support, and we identified that this was the issue. Exporting mono files as stereo fixes the problem in the short term, @Mancunian Juice, and again, RØDE said that this will be fixed in a future firmware upgrade.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 05:15:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RØDECaster Pro Multitrack - How It Works (And More Features From Update 1.1.0 Explained)</title><link>https://www.rode.com/blog/all/RODECaster-Pro-Multitrack#comment-4366608360</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m having this issue too, post-1.1.0; have emailed support and will update here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 09:57:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RØDECaster Pro Multitrack - How It Works (And More Features From Update 1.1.0 Explained)</title><link>https://www.rode.com/blog/all/RODECaster-Pro-Multitrack#comment-4366372878</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t know if it was poor reading comprehension on my part, or if strategy and roadmap has changed, but I thought that the multitrack option coming to the RØDECaster Pro &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; for recording to microSD, rather than over USB, so I was surprised to see it ‘switch’. I too would really like this option; I had thought it was going to spit individual WAVs for each track, as well as the stereo mixdown, out to microSD.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 06:09:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is the Apple Pencil a true design tool?</title><link>http://www.creativebloq.com/hardware/apple-pencil-true-design-tool-121518178#comment-2393399577</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is indeed mentioned in the review! I haven't spent enough time with it to be comfortable expressing an opinion yet, though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:33:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is the Apple Pencil a true design tool?</title><link>http://www.creativebloq.com/hardware/apple-pencil-true-design-tool-121518178#comment-2393398083</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And just to be clearer still, Chris liked the product because the product is good…&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:33:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Was the Absolute Worst Moment of the iPhone 6S Launch, and It's Unacceptable</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/09/this-was-the-absolute-worst-moment-of-the-iphone-6s-launch-and-its-unacceptable/#comment-2246703303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well hi there. I’ve been dipping into the comments every now and then since this piece went live, and the reason I haven’t responded is that experience suggests there’s little genuine constructive dialogue to be had here. I’ve said my piece, you’ve said yours, and I strongly suspect neither of us will be convinced by the arguments of the other.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to the Milo thing, for what it’s worth I wasn’t mocking anyone else or even mocking the tastes of someone. It just tickled me that someone who disagreed with my stance would, of course, view him as a hero, whereas I find him quite unpleasant. And hey, that’s fine; you can find me quite unpleasant in return.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I will allow, mind you, that Milo’s hair is infinitely more fabulous that mine will ever be.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:31:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An indispensable guide to email management for creatives</title><link>http://www.creativebloq.com/productivity/indispensable-guide-email-management-creatives-71515643#comment-2123483014</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, it’s worth digging into Labs frequently if you’re a heavy Gmail user, as there are often interesting and useful things in there. (Just be careful not to become obsessed with trying new techniques and tools; mastering broader lifestyle techniques often pay better dividends!)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 09:25:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Complete guide to Mac and iPhone screenshots</title><link>http://www.creativebloq.com/apple/complete-guide-mac-and-iphone-screenshots-61515171#comment-2087953647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Make sure you restart. (Or just log out and in again. Or you can issue a kill command in Terminal, but restarting is the easiest method for non-technical folks.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:27:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Became More British Than Tea and Crumpets at WWDC 2015</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/06/apple-became-more-british-than-tea-and-crumpets-at-wwdc-2015/#comment-2069918065</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hush now. I realised that as soon as I reread it and asked the editor to fix it; and we would have gotten away with it too if it wasn’t for you pesky kids.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 10:15:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Everything is awesome</title><link>http://www.alphr.com/life-culture/1000849/everything-is-awesome#comment-2059623041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:55:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Watch Review: Rewarding, Intriguing and Just About Worth Your Time</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/04/apple-watch-review-rewarding-intriguing-and-just-about-worth-your-time/#comment-2009991355</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Shaun. Since you follow me on Twitter you probably saw me posting tonight about that ‘what is it for’ question on my own website. It’s a tricky question – though only because the answers are both so personal and so apparently dull.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 17:21:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Watch Review: Rewarding, Intriguing and Just About Worth Your Time</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/04/apple-watch-review-rewarding-intriguing-and-just-about-worth-your-time/#comment-1997419824</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple hasn’t asked press not to talk about that as far as I know. As I alluded to in the review, I don’t feel qualified to pass judgement on it. I’ve read learned people say it’s highly accurate but also other trustworthy people say it’s not, so much more research is needed. Sorry I wasn’t able to answer this for you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 05:44:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Watch Review: Rewarding, Intriguing and Just About Worth Your Time</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/04/apple-watch-review-rewarding-intriguing-and-just-about-worth-your-time/#comment-1997255536</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for taking the time to comment, Tom; it means a lot to hear you enjoyed it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Incidentally, as I'm sure you can readily imagine, one of the reasons writers often don't participate in the comments is because they can be full of vitriol and ad hominem attack; this one turned out to be highly civilised, however!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 01:47:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Watch Review: Rewarding, Intriguing and Just About Worth Your Time</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/04/apple-watch-review-rewarding-intriguing-and-just-about-worth-your-time/#comment-1997253375</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I know a few people still awaiting theirs! Hopefully soon, as you say; let me know how you find it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 01:44:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Watch Review: Rewarding, Intriguing and Just About Worth Your Time</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/04/apple-watch-review-rewarding-intriguing-and-just-about-worth-your-time/#comment-1996127041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That was indeed the intent of my point. And that's the first time I've been defended by a tyrannosaurus, sexual or otherwise. 🐲&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:01:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Watch Review: Rewarding, Intriguing and Just About Worth Your Time</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/04/apple-watch-review-rewarding-intriguing-and-just-about-worth-your-time/#comment-1995978790</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I did on mine, and that port isn't there. (I think speculation is that it's just for diagnostics rather than expansion, FWIW.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:42:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Watch Review: Rewarding, Intriguing and Just About Worth Your Time</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/04/apple-watch-review-rewarding-intriguing-and-just-about-worth-your-time/#comment-1995897381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FWIW, the Sport lacks that, I believe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:55:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Watch Review: Rewarding, Intriguing and Just About Worth Your Time</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/04/apple-watch-review-rewarding-intriguing-and-just-about-worth-your-time/#comment-1995894594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I too have the haptic feedback turned up to the max (though not with prominent haptic turned on); as I mentioned – and perhaps because I walk quickly – it's only when walking (or driving, with other vibration happening) that I might be unsure if the Watch is tapping me or not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:53:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Watch Review: Rewarding, Intriguing and Just About Worth Your Time</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/04/apple-watch-review-rewarding-intriguing-and-just-about-worth-your-time/#comment-1995889633</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fair enough. As I mentioned, I liked getting data about my sleep patterns from wearing the Activité or Jawbone, say.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:50:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Watch Review: Rewarding, Intriguing and Just About Worth Your Time</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/04/apple-watch-review-rewarding-intriguing-and-just-about-worth-your-time/#comment-1995887680</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd be most grateful if you'd take a moment to explain that a little more. It's entirely possible you're right, but I'd like a little more detail.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:49:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Andy Warhol Was Right About the Apple Watch</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/04/andy-warhol-was-right-about-the-apple-watch/#comment-1957368097</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello, and thanks for commenting! My point wasn’t to compare even a £229 Apple Watch with a can of Coke, but instead to point out that, just as Warhol said that every can of Coke was the same [on the inside], so too is every Apple Watch [on the inside]. Does that make sense?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:11:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New MacBook, Pro, Air or Mac Mini: Which Apple Mac Should You Buy?</title><link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2015/03/new-macbook-pro-air-or-mac-mini-which-apple-mac-should-you-buy/#comment-1899806959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know I’ll regret asking, but oh, to hell with it: in what way is this advertorial? Neither I nor Gizmodo is saying ‘buy a Mac’, but we’re helping those people _who have decided to buy a Mac_ pick the right one for them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 16:56:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I love my smartphone's snapper, so why did I just buy a dedicated camera?</title><link>http://www.techradar.com/news/photography-video-capture/i-love-my-smartphone-s-snapper-so-why-did-i-just-buy-a-dedicated-camera--1285391#comment-1868993404</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since I wrote it, I do! It's the Sony NEX-5T.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2015 07:15:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should designers care about typographic mistakes?</title><link>http://www.creativebloq.com/typography/should-designers-care-about-typographic-mistakes-21514209#comment-1859585507</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since we’re recommending books, can I recommend Shady Characters by Keith Houston? A lovely read, and fascinating for anyone interested in typography’s meta-narrative.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/184614647X/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;camp=1634&amp;amp;creative=19450&amp;amp;creativeASIN=184614647X&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;tag=therapy-21&amp;amp;linkId=MJNWENQB3H6WQAMR" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/184614647X/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;camp=1634&amp;amp;creative=19450&amp;amp;creativeASIN=184614647X&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;tag=therapy-21&amp;amp;linkId=MJNWENQB3H6WQAMR"&gt;http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Phin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 05:17:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>