<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for chrispeoples</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/chrispeoples/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:24:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook? Up 10%. Twitter? Up 16%. FriendFeed? Flat</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/facebook_up_10_twitter_up_16_friendfeed_flat/#comment-12597471</link><description>You point is well taken, AND shows the way that FriendFeed can win:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Make a few addtl. changes to become a robust Twitter client (needs Reply and RT links/buttons, as well as easy import of all Twitter "following" accounts not yet on FF as Imaginary Friends - or some other way if that were too resource intensive).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) Become the de facto feed reader better than Google Reader by adding a "Subscribe to this" bookmarklet and similar button on items within FriendFeed that link to an RSS'able source. These subscriptions (to sources rather than users) could be managed either as Imaginary Friends, or as "Groups/Rooms" managed by FF admin, asf.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) Find a way to import the Facebook Home page (friends' updates), and you then have a unified inbound feed with everything important going on (say under "Favorites"). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have been doing something close to this, minus the FB import, for a while now manually, and it works, it's just too much work to set up currently for most people to do it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Once you combine the 3 top Web 2.0 uses this way, it becomes a lot more compelling. That's what FF needs, a compelling use case that is easy to set up and easily DEMONSTRATED. Loic just came out with the Seesmic Web-based Twitter client, FF is not that far off at all from offering that and more. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The infrastructure is there, now all it needs is a few tweaks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AlexSchleber</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:24:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook? Up 10%. Twitter? Up 16%. FriendFeed? Flat</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/facebook_up_10_twitter_up_16_friendfeed_flat/#comment-12571904</link><description>Rated up your comment. That's very true!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hate twitter mainly for the lack of features to manage my tweets and friends. I do not want to use seismic, Tweetdeck to handle all that. I want everything in one place. Friendfeed does that. What is the need for any other client.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, better mobile interface is a must for FF.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">krishnamoorthy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:25:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook? Up 10%. Twitter? Up 16%. FriendFeed? Flat</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/facebook_up_10_twitter_up_16_friendfeed_flat/#comment-12454253</link><description>Scoble, the reason why 3rd-party developers haven't yet built a FriendFeed client is not because the API is "hard to use" (it's actually quite simple), but because FriendFeed's own interface is already the best client. people build twitter clients because &lt;a href="http://twitter.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;twitter.com&lt;/a&gt; sucks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:59:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flush You Hussy!</title><link>http://flushyouhussy.disqus.com/flush_you_hussy_25/#comment-12233547</link><description>so true. some people don't realize they need to flush twice.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:38:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/07/status-search-queries-updates-from-your.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_932/#comment-12199689</link><description>you'd think they'd offer the ability to login with Facebook or Twitter too, rather than having to register a new account. do they ask for your facebook/twitter credentials in order to search those sites?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:02:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hashtags are dead. Long live real-time search and filtering!</title><link>http://coldacid.disqus.com/hashtags_are_dead_long_live_real_time_search_and_filtering/#comment-8049340</link><description>Yeah, but likewise you could write "Lakers' Kobe's in a zone right now", which actually makes more sense in English too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sportpsychrob</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:01:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hashtags are dead. Long live real-time search and filtering!</title><link>http://coldacid.disqus.com/hashtags_are_dead_long_live_real_time_search_and_filtering/#comment-8048836</link><description>So if I were to tweet something like, "Kobe's in a zone right now," something that's obviously related to the Lakers would not show up in a search for "lakers". I need to add the hash tag so it can be found: "Kobe's in a zone right now #lakers". Unless the search engine is smart enough to make the connection for you, you need the hash tag to make the connection.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:58:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/alltops-custom-pages-finally-tip-me-to.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_773/#comment-7372597</link><description>Sounds like Netvibes. And Netvibes has way more customizing options.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:16:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/lovehate-relationship-with-my-bluetooth.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_117/#comment-6924173</link><description>This might be Apple's subtle way of telling you to buy their headset. Not that I can vouch for it. Or the iPhone. But I've been pretty pleased with my Plantronics headset.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:55:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Has Two Thumbs and Writes for ReadWriteWeb?  This guy.</title><link>http://scribkin.disqus.com/what_has_two_thumbs_and_writes_for_readwriteweb_this_guy/#comment-6915338</link><description>RWW was already my favorite web news source, and it just keeps getting better. congrats.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:11:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The future of online conversations is NOT Twitter</title><link>http://coldacid.disqus.com/the_future_of_online_conversations_is_not_twitter/#comment-6914336</link><description>Twitter to me is like a zoo. It's great for watching, but not for interacting. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I couple years back I started looking for ways to share things online, and Tumblr felt like the best option. One problem: no commenting. It felt like an echo chamber. Between Tumblr, delicious, and the various other services I used, I felt that there had to be a better way to discuss these things with my friends without sending them an email or IM. I found disqus (which I still think is fantastic, wish more blogs used it) and added it to my Tumblr account, hoping it would generate some feedback (which it didn't). Then I discovered "lifestreaming", and shortly after that, FriendFeed launched. Halle-freaking-llujah, I could aggregate all my stuff in one place and better yet, people could comment! Granted, my friends haven't taken to the service yet (ironically, more of them have taken to Twitter), but I still think FriendFeed is the best place for interaction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still wish FriendFeed used disqus to power its comments though. Threaded conversations, and email notifications.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:44:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Text or video, which is king? Well, it really depends on your audience.</title><link>http://coldacid.disqus.com/text_or_video_which_is_king_well_it_really_depends_on_your_audience/#comment-5482800</link><description>Actually you can already directly link to a timestamp in YouTube videos: &lt;a href="http://mashable.com/2008/10/30/youtube-deep-link-playback/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://mashable.com/2008/10/30/youtube-deep-lin...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:52:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Prop 8 Tangles Religion, Tech and Politics</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_prop_8_tangles_religion_tech_and_politics/#comment-3461240</link><description>Chris, my understanding is that his wife has made her public  &lt;br&gt;opposition to Prop 8 known, including signage and funding. The church  &lt;br&gt;can't force anyone's hand on the subject, as noted in the post, though  &lt;br&gt;their position has been made quite clear. In a follow-on story in the  &lt;br&gt;Chronicle, it stated Steve prefers to remain neutral on politics and  &lt;br&gt;hasn't made any kind of statement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, the church has hundreds of thousands of members in  &lt;br&gt;California. Though I don't have the most recent stats, a 1990  &lt;br&gt;statistic estimated more than half a million, and I don't know how  &lt;br&gt;many of them Steve Young's endorsement (or that of his wife) would  &lt;br&gt;sway. I've met the guy, and he struck me as being more humble than  &lt;br&gt;aggressive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">louismg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:00:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Prop 8 Tangles Religion, Tech and Politics</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_prop_8_tangles_religion_tech_and_politics/#comment-3461089</link><description>Chris, my understanding is that his wife has made her public  &lt;br&gt;opposition to Prop 8 known, including signage and funding. The church  &lt;br&gt;can't force anyone's hand on the subject, as noted in the post, though  &lt;br&gt;their position has been made quite clear. In a follow-on story in the  &lt;br&gt;Chronicle, it stated Steve prefers to remain neutral on politics and  &lt;br&gt;hasn't made any kind of statement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, the church has hundreds of thousands of members in  &lt;br&gt;California. Though I don't have the most recent stats, a 1990  &lt;br&gt;statistic estimated more than half a million, and I don't know how  &lt;br&gt;many of them Steve Young's endorsement (or that of his wife) would  &lt;br&gt;sway. I've met the guy, and he struck me as being more humble than  &lt;br&gt;aggressive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">louismg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:51:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Prop 8 Tangles Religion, Tech and Politics</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_prop_8_tangles_religion_tech_and_politics/#comment-3460089</link><description>Oops...accidentally submitted twice</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:44:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Prop 8 Tangles Religion, Tech and Politics</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_prop_8_tangles_religion_tech_and_politics/#comment-3460068</link><description>Say Louis, what do you make of &lt;a href="http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/the_sporting_blog/entry/view/14211/steve_young,_a_mormon,_cancels_out_jeff_kent" rel="nofollow"&gt;Steve Young's stance against Prop 8&lt;/a&gt;?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:42:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lamont can read</title><link>http://lpeoples.disqus.com/lamont_can_read_92/#comment-2949048</link><description>It's pretty sad to see that Sterling had no loyalty to the one man that showed him loyalty.  I don't know how Elgin worked for him all those years.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:58:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Can Cuil, Built for the Long-Term, Win the "Instant Analysis" Battle?</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_can_cuil_built_for_the_long_term_win_the_instant_analysis_battle/#comment-1020943</link><description>I'll admit, I jumped to a conclusion after a single search last night.  But when you search for a popular term such as "lakers", you don't expect the search engine to say "There were no relevant results." Which is what Cuil did, last night.  Today its returning results, so perhaps I'll give it another chance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, you can't blame people for coming to quick conclusions.  As they say, the first impression is the most important one, and when you come out making big claims like Cuil, that impression better be a damn good one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:21:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lamont can read</title><link>http://lpeoples.disqus.com/lamont_can_read_06/#comment-1009301</link><description>Or, just drive the speed limit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:23:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lamont can read</title><link>http://lpeoples.disqus.com/lamont_can_read_21/#comment-970031</link><description>I'll second that vote.  Hands down its Conroy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:34:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There&amp;rsquo;s Web 2.0 and then there&amp;rsquo;s Reality</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/therersquos_web_20_and_then_therersquos_reality/#comment-783040</link><description>Well then, I hope your situation improves.  Best of luck to you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:04:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There&amp;rsquo;s Web 2.0 and then there&amp;rsquo;s Reality</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/therersquos_web_20_and_then_therersquos_reality/#comment-782060</link><description>Trust me I'm a definite resident of below the poverty line or at least I can scratch its underbelly without reaching too far :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:07:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There&amp;rsquo;s Web 2.0 and then there&amp;rsquo;s Reality</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/therersquos_web_20_and_then_therersquos_reality/#comment-781984</link><description>Trying not to pass judgment here, because I don't know your full situation and I tend to be real picky about semantics, but are you sure not broke, rather than &lt;a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/poor" rel="nofollow"&gt;poor&lt;/a&gt;?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:55:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Really Using FriendFeed, or are You a Poser?</title><link>http://scribkin.disqus.com/are_you_really_using_friendfeed_or_are_you_a_poser/#comment-775629</link><description>If you are saying what I think, which is that FriendFeed should notify you somehow of new replies on old conversations, I'm &lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com/e/0ea6d925-415b-46dd-9fae-dda95b191adf/Request-A-Catch-Up-tab-that-is-populated-with/" rel="nofollow"&gt;right there with you&lt;/a&gt;!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eng1ne</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:55:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Really Using FriendFeed, or are You a Poser?</title><link>http://scribkin.disqus.com/are_you_really_using_friendfeed_or_are_you_a_poser/#comment-775407</link><description>That would be cool.  Disqus just empowers my laziness.  Whenever I leave a comment somewhere - which is rare - I always forget to check back for replies.  I even forget where I've commented at.  Disqus takes care of these things for me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrispeoples</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:46:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>