<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Kevin Pang</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/cf9831de25f7008523a7e93c93629cff/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:07:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: SubSonic 3.0 Preview 1: Linq Has Landed : Rob Conery</title><link>http://robconery.disqus.com/subsonic_30_preview_1_linq_has_landed_rob_conery/#comment-3611753</link><description>Looks great Rob.  Can't wait to play around with this. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Pang</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:07:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Lao Tse thinks of TDD</title><link>http://thefreakparade.disqus.com/what_lao_tse_thinks_of_tdd/#comment-2650704</link><description>That was very well written.  It's rare these days to see bloggers take the time and due diligence to write up something like this.  Thank you for the interesting read.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find that your experience with TDD to be very similar to mine -- a little slow at first, but without a doubt worthwhile.  I'm not so sure I agree with the analogy of TDD being the fingers of a potter; I think the comparison works better to software development as a whole.  I'm not actually sure where TDD fits into that analogy to be honest.  Perhaps that's why it's so hard for some to adopt it.  There are very few professions where something like TDD is encouraged, so it only makes sense that it feels a bit unnatural to developers (and even moreso to newer developers who have not had to experience the pain that comes from working with code that is not unit tested).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyways, those are my thoughts.  Thanks again for the great read. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Pang</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:39:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>