<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Lucas Gonze</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/ce56978a238760a1bc56fc25aa24d3f1/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:41:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Ian Roger's Aspen Music Talk</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/ian_rogers_aspen_music_talk_27/#comment-75531</link><description>Fred, I think you'll dig the player.  If you want more precise control over the player than with the default view, check out: &lt;a href="http://yahoomediaplayer.wikia.com/wiki/How_To_Link" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://yahoomediaplayer.wikia.com/wiki/How_To_Link&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is very much a first release and there are still bugs big enough to matter.  For example the play state sometimes gets out of sync and you end up with two songs going at once.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, we're eating too much screen real estate in the default layout.  In the next rev we'll have the same footprint as PlayTagger.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, I am both the product lead for this player (I report to Ian) and Sylvia's peer at Xiph.  The business and standards issues are aligned.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:59:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo! Gets Behind Rhapsody</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/yahoo_gets_behind_rhapsody/#comment-135567</link><description>Hi Fred,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FYI, the new build of the music player with the improvements I mentioned is now up.  See &lt;a href="http://developer.yahoo.net/blog/archives/2008/02/yahoo_media_pla.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://developer.yahoo.net/blog/archives/2008/0...&lt;/a&gt; for details.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Lucas Gonze</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:22:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fred Wilson Dot VC</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/fred_wilson_dot_vc_7501/#comment-591577</link><description>Fred, I love that the auto-playlisting feature of the player is what led you to this song.  It totally validates our idea that all the media in the page would be analogous to a webcast stream or long-form podcast.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:53:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Widgets Is The Wrong Word For What We're Doing</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/why_widgets_is_the_wrong_word_for_what_were_doing_81/#comment-764353</link><description>comparing YMP approach</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:10:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can You Build A Business On Browser Extensions?</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/can_you_build_a_business_on_browser_extensions/#comment-822957</link><description>It's not really a question of whether extensions are a business but of how the mechanics of extensions fit your business objectives.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Client-side software has fewer users but more engagement and stickiness.  The users you do have either spend a lot more time with your software or are much more committed to it.  So if you're a business living in a web site, you can grow your (average but not median) engagement and lower your churn by growing features on the client side.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or at least that's how it should work.  There are obviously would-be businesses with client-side products that have low time spent and high churn.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:58:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Make Your Own Music Site in 10 Minutes - Joe Lazarus</title><link>http://joelaz.disqus.com/how_to_make_your_own_music_site_in_10_minutes_joe_lazarus/#comment-211713</link><description>Added to the list of YMP mashups here: &lt;a href="http://yahoomediaplayer.wikia.com/wiki/Mashups_and_applications#The_List" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://yahoomediaplayer.wikia.com/wiki/Mashups_...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 18:22:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dembot - Voeh Blocks International Users</title><link>http://dembot.disqus.com/dembot_voeh_blocks_international_users/#comment-565463</link><description>For all that licensed content they probably don't have international deals, and even if they did the ads they could sell would probably only cover the domestic market.  Given that the royalties must be brutal, I'm not surprised.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 21:55:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The most import thing to understand about new products and startups</title><link>http://paulbuchheit.disqus.com/the_most_import_thing_to_understand_about_new_products_and_startups/#comment-156423</link><description>I strongly agree with this perspective.  It's good to see you articulating and documenting it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sometimes the users just don't know what they want, and they need the product design to steer them in directions they didn't even know existed.  But aside from that one exception, the rule is that developers have to be humble and view their job as watching and reacting to real-world usage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The killer usecase for &lt;a href="http://Webjay.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;Webjay.org&lt;/a&gt;, for example, turned out to be exporting XSPF for third party XSPF widgets to render.  This was very different from what I expected when I started on either Webjay or XSPF.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:02:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The RSS soap opera (updated)</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/the_rss_soap_opera_updated/#comment-1292755</link><description>It's a bummer because it's such a betrayal of Rogers Cadenhead, who has been incredibly loyal to Dave.  I don't want to talk too highly of Rogers, who is a sycophant, but instead to say that I can't believe Dave would have so little sense of reciprocity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:02:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ars Technica snapped up by Conde Nast</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/ars_technica_snapped_up_by_conde_nast_79/#comment-480796</link><description>$36 CPM is very very rich.  Even if they get that on some page views, they don't have 100% sell through at that rate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:07:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amores Perros</title><link>http://patwoodward.disqus.com/amores_perros/#comment-576469</link><description>Q'd up on Netflix.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the reco.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:43:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on that ad-sup discussion</title><link>http://patwoodward.disqus.com/more_on_that_ad_sup_discussion/#comment-926690</link><description>It is mind boggling how passive that is.  "The train isn't coming towards me that fast, so why should I get off the track if it might still stop?"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:35:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Everyone else is arguing about HTML 5&amp;#039;s video codecs. Why can&amp;#039;t I?</title><link>http://sull.disqus.com/everyone_else_is_arguing_about_html_5039s_video_codecs_why_can039t_i/#comment-12266983</link><description>I don't buy the patent argument.  That's meaningless fear, uncertainty and doubt as far as I know.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:57:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Everyone else is arguing about HTML 5&amp;#039;s video codecs. Why can&amp;#039;t I?</title><link>http://sull.disqus.com/everyone_else_is_arguing_about_html_5039s_video_codecs_why_can039t_i/#comment-12274452</link><description>More comments here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://gonze.com/blog/2009/07/07/a-plan-for-codecs/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://gonze.com/blog/2009/07/07/a-plan-for-cod...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:32:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What we know and what we don&amp;#8217;t know about Facebook&amp;#8217;s finances</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/what_we_know_and_what_we_don8217t_know_about_facebook8217s_finances/#comment-3424892</link><description>Servers just aren't that expensive.  There's no way they would account for costs at the level TC is speculating about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:54:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wilco in Chicago [Testing Y! Media player]</title><link>http://netzoo.disqus.com/wilco_in_chicago_testing_y_media_player/#comment-2336522</link><description>Working fine for me with FF 2.0.12 on OS X.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:43:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bringing the blog back to life</title><link>http://collier.disqus.com/bringing_the_blog_back_to_life/#comment-764094</link><description>You walk it like you talk it, Mark.  Good shit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just set up a dreamhost account to migrate my blog over from &lt;a href="http://wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt;, cause I can't have goose at toni's site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:47:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The real Sparky Collier</title><link>http://collier.disqus.com/the_real_sparky_collier/#comment-775364</link><description>I still miss my dog Elvis.  That handle seems to be always taken, though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:35:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eye-fi:  instant photo uploads for a Benjamin</title><link>http://collier.disqus.com/eye_fi_instant_photo_uploads_for_a_benjamin/#comment-851373</link><description>What an insanely great piece of work.  The simplicity is really clever.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:11:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Power of Ignorance</title><link>http://collier.disqus.com/the_power_of_ignorance/#comment-3394475</link><description>I wonder about the direction of causation.  To some extent I think that people who wanted the Iraq war found ways to believe whatever was necessary to justify it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In fact, I'll bet that plenty of people who read your post don't agree that evidence of links between Iraq and al Qaeda has not been found, weapons of mass destruction have not been found in Iraq, and that world public opinion didn't favor the US going to war with Iraq.  They'll think that you're either lying or willfully mistaken.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Among people who liked the Iraq war and are too literate to fake their own reality, I think a lot of them privately disbelieve in the facts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:02:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happy in Paris</title><link>http://youarekillingme.disqus.com/happy_in_paris/#comment-1368470</link><description>bon appetit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:53:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LA&amp;#8217;s best pizza is Joe&amp;#8217;s Pizza | youarekillingme.net</title><link>http://youarekillingme.disqus.com/la8217s_best_pizza_is_joe8217s_pizza_youarekillingmenet/#comment-1368483</link><description>Oh yeah.  Oh yeah.  Steve, I'm blowing off Thanksgiving dinner and heading over for the slice.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:42:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Meatless Mondays | youarekillingme.net</title><link>http://youarekillingme.disqus.com/meatless_mondays_youarekillingmenet/#comment-1368497</link><description>So, for example, no salad bowls made out of bacon on Mondays?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously, "Supersize Me" had a definite impact on my eating fast food, and I know that that Robert Pollan's writing has a comparable effect for a lot of people WRT meat.  He seems to have a common sense way of making the case for eating habits that are otherwise a bit new agey.  Haven't read him yet myself, though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:07:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Etiquette | youarekillingme.net</title><link>http://youarekillingme.disqus.com/twitter_etiquette_youarekillingmenet/#comment-1368503</link><description>Right on, Steve.  It's easy to unfollow the overposters, so why complain?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I kind of like emayoh's Hype Machine bot posts, actually.  I check out the songs pretty often.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:42:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital Signals: Blog knowledge - The power of the internal link</title><link>http://digitalsignals.disqus.com/digital_signals_blog_knowledge_the_power_of_the_internal_link/#comment-8420884</link><description>For my own blogs (&lt;a href="http://blog.gonze.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;blog.gonze.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://soupgreens.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;soupgreens.com&lt;/a&gt;) I have no good way for people to return to old posts, so writing is completely transient.  This can't be the right thing, I know.  The blockker is that common widgets like a calendar-oriented browser for the archives don't fix the problem. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe the Wordle approach is a good tool.  I'd be interested in hearing about your experiences implementing it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:19:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exchangeable Shares - a Better Way for Angel Investors</title><link>http://angelblog.disqus.com/exchangeable_shares_a_better_way_for_angel_investors/#comment-12231234</link><description>Speaking as an entrepreneur, I don't see that this would harm my own interests, and it might help raise seed money.  On the other hand it might make it harder to raise followup rounds.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any thoughts on how series A investors would react?  What's your experience so far?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:38:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2006/01/10/webjay-playlist-community-i-just-dont-get-it/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_9183/#comment-5890118</link><description>Pete, I love this post. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When you say it's like delicious, that's correct in the sense that it's a link sharing community, but it misses the key point.  The insight behind Webjay is that the mainstream browser web is a really good way to do internet media, a way which is often better than filesharing, BitTorrent, or DRM pay per download stores.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, that's the thing driving all my hackery.  Webjay is indeed rough around the edges, as akaraff says, and that's ok because it doesn't get in the way of the main value, which is about all the new stuff you can do with internet media if you stick to the mainstream web.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:47:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2006/01/10/webjay-playlist-community-i-just-dont-get-it/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_9183/#comment-5890120</link><description>Thanks, Pete!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About the issues with copyrighted material in music, photos, and videos, my feeling is that there's absolutely no difference between the legal status of a song file and the legal status of a typical web page.  This is counter-intuitive for a lot of different reasons, but this is just an issue of expectations -- you aren't going to get free and legal links to huge pop classics, so it seems like free and legal links aren't worth much.  That's not so!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:21:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2006/01/10/webjay-playlist-community-i-just-dont-get-it/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_9183/#comment-5890124</link><description>Christopher, when you say that what you see on Webjay is 99% illegal, you're simply wrong.  You're thinking that commercial music must be unauthorized, when in fact the labels frequently host it.  To know what's the story on any one item, check the host.  This is the web, not filesharing, and different ways of doing things apply.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:40:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2006/02/02/dabble-delicious-for-video/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_7936/#comment-5890453</link><description>There's a lot of value in specialized communities of human-to-human sharing.  Plus, vertical tools to manage notoriously gnarly and uncooperative file types like video are probably out of range for generalist sites like delicious.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:03:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2006/07/17/bliptv-gets-funding-for-youtube-rival/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_8075/#comment-5899234</link><description>I can see from your writing here that you just discovered Blip and are perceiving it as a me-too, but in fact Blip precedes YouTube, and is a massive favorite in the videoblogging community.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:59:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo&amp;#8217;s New Artist Pages Aggregate Online Music From Across the Web</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/yahoo8217s_new_artist_pages_aggregate_online_music_from_across_the_web/#comment-7924648</link><description>Ben: yup, it started as Foxytunes Planet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:15:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In a post-scarcity publishing world, the key is to own the most relevant copy</title><link>http://ericwahlforss.disqus.com/in_a_post_scarcity_publishing_world_the_key_is_to_own_the_most_relevant_copy/#comment-5700099</link><description>Yup.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Someday the labels will learn that all they have to do is own the canonical URL, and then they can insert ads as needed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See also:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://gonze.com/weblog/story/7-11-4" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://gonze.com/weblog/story/7-11-4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://gonze.com/weblog/story/7-12-4" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://gonze.com/weblog/story/7-12-4&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:58:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What you all are missing about Google</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/what_you_all_are_missing_about_google/#comment-9700119</link><description>What makes you think that webmail isn't profitable, Robert?  That doesn't make sense.  It has rock bottom content costs and sky high engagement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only overhead is for coders, hosting and storage, which are a non-negotiable part of almost all web apps.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:02:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital Music Royalties Grow; YouTube Becoming A Big Money-Spinner</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/digital_music_royalties_grow_youtube_becoming_a_big_money_spinner/#comment-18831867</link><description>Did the data include the gross of pay-per-download (iTMS) vs streaming royalties (YouTube), Robert?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:30:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Streaming Ads Driving Users Away From Content: Report</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/streaming_ads_driving_users_away_from_content_report/#comment-18831836</link><description>The premise of this survey is a little whacky.  What all that video content is doing there in the first place is creating video ad inventory.  It&amp;#39;s extremely expensive to host video, however it&amp;#39;s doable if you can sell in-stream spots, which have a high CPM.  The two are joined at the hip.  No ads, no content.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because the premise is whacky the questions don&amp;#39;t make a lot of sense.  For example, &amp;quot;more than three-quarters (78.4 percent) of respondents said in-stream ads are intrusive&amp;quot; means exactly nothing.  What value does this sentence impart?  Users are watching video, and they are watching video ads regardless of whether the ads are intrusive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:24:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital Music Royalties Grow; YouTube Becoming A Big Money-Spinner</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/digital_music_royalties_grow_youtube_becoming_a_big_money_spinner/#comment-18831869</link><description>Tonsotunez, streams are normally compensated on a per-stream basis, so the direct revenues are strictly proportional to plays, not listeners.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:41:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Earnings: Napster Q2 Revs Fall; Paid Subs Drop Sharply</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/earnings_napster_q2_revs_fall_paid_subs_drop_sharply/#comment-18834091</link><description>It means that their churn rate and customer acquisition costs are out of whack.  They spend more on marketing to generate a subscriber than they earn on the lifetime value of a subscriber, and they&amp;#39;ve already burned through the upfront investment capital allocated to getting started.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:51:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: __lucas &amp;mdash; Progressive enhancement of hAudio using the Amie...</title><link>http://imlucas.disqus.com/__lucas_mdash_progressive_enhancement_of_haudio_using_the_amie/#comment-20587902</link><description>How does the ecommerce part work, __lucas?  I'm wondering about what the user flow would be when there needs to be an interruption to make a purchase.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:27:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: __lucas &amp;mdash; Progressive enhancement of hAudio using the Amie...</title><link>http://imlucas.disqus.com/__lucas_mdash_progressive_enhancement_of_haudio_using_the_amie/#comment-20674877</link><description>Comments at &lt;a href="http://gonze.com/blog/2009/10/20/ecommerce-content-resolution/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://gonze.com/blog/2009/10/20/ecommerce-cont...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Gonze</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:41:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>