DISQUS

DISQUS Hello!  The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.

Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.

Paul's picture

Unregistered

Feeds

aliases

  • Paul

Paul

3 months ago

in Take card payments on your Nokia with TaxiPay on Mobile Industry Review
The fact is according to the banks this is a cardholder present transaction, however, there is no way to prove that the cardholder was there. No PIN number, no signature, etc. Also, fraudsters always find the least secure places to test stolen card numbers before making a "big ticket" purchase. This includes places like self service petrol pumps, mobile top-ups and even charity donations. So this *could* be an easy target for them to try out stolen cards.
1 reply
Theo Stolen cards have declined, it is stolen card numbers that has risen. When the numbers are stolen in the majority of cases they do not have the 3 digit security number from the back as they only rip of the mag strip. Taxipay uses the security number, and it seems they supply dockets to get the signature to prove the card was present too. If I go ahead I planned to ask for ID, even other cards in the same name, I get asked for ID when I use my cards abroad and I don't have an issue with it. Why go to the risk of handing over a dodgy card at the end of a cab journey, when you can pay for a billion things online where they don't see your face or where you went or have been.

3 months ago

in Take card payments on your Nokia with TaxiPay on Mobile Industry Review
With reference to this quote: "is no different from placing an order over the phone and giving your card details there". It is different in the eyes of the bank. If you accept payments over the phone it is classed as a 'MOTO' payment (Mail Order / Telephone Order). What you have in the taxi is a CardHolder Present transaction, therefore you should either take the payment via a Chip & PIN reader or the customer verifies the purchase by a signed receipt. It may not be that Chip & PIN is mandatory yet according to APACS the two main areas of fraud last year were on transactions NOT protected by chip and PIN.
1 reply
Night Walker So fraudsters steal card details to make cab journeys???? Even so, how would they do that without the 3 digit code off the back of the card that is needed? The demo uses the 3 digits. I suppose it is the same as booking online, letting the cabbie call it in or ordering a pizza delivery.

3 months ago

in Take card payments on your Nokia with TaxiPay on Mobile Industry Review
Hmm, that's all well & good but would you read out your card details, security code, etc to a random taxi driver so he can type them in his phone! Plus since 2004 it has been mandatory in the UK that all "cardholder present" transactions should be done via Chip & PIN. In theory its a good idea but not really secure!
2 replies
Darrell Bluck We are the developers of TaxiPay. Giving card details to a taxi driver is no different from placing an order over the phone and giving your card details there. Every driver signed up to the TaxiPay service is also licenced with either the public carriage office or their local council and would be stripped of this is caught breaking the law. TaxiPay also logs every transaction done by drivers and so can if a driver was stealing card details they would be easy to identify.

Chip and PIN is not mandatory. In the US most cards do not have a Chip and Chip and PIN has only been adopted by some countries. The UK banks advise retailers to use Chip and PIN to protect themselves. This means that it is actually the TaxiPay driver who carries any fraud risk and not the card holder.

Happy to answer any further questions / points
Theo I think it is great, much better than forking out to rent a terminal that you have to haul around everywhere. I have been looking at accepting cards for a few months now and this is ideal as I doubt I would get a merchant account. As for security, this is way more secure than calling into the office and trying to read all the details out over the phone to Doris or Dave while they write them down like many mobile operators do. And I think Paul is wrong, Chip and pin it is only a recommendation and up to the merchant, my local supermarket only started using it a few months ago!

9 months ago

in The LG Renoir is a work of art on Mobile Industry Review
It looks very much like the Samsung Omnia from that angle! The only difference is the 3 hardware buttons all look the same whereas the Samsung has the Call, Hangup and Optical mouse across the bottom instead.

P.S. The Samsung camera also does the smile recognition thing, its "only" 5mp though!

9 months ago

in The Dancing Dude at the Skyfire Party on Mobile Industry Review
I like the way you begin to join in after a couple of minutes with the "dancing" camera movements. :-)

9 months ago

in You’ve seen the iPhone, now take a look at the competition on Mobile Industry Review
I reckon the Samsung Omnia is a damn fine phone. Great data speeds, good UI, good camera, etc.

9 months ago

in Carphone Warehouse Liveline Insurance: Total Rubbish on Mobile Industry Review
Did the CPW salesman state that the insurance would cover you if you lost the handset? If so how about claiming the insurance was mis-sold just like all those PPI (Payment Protection Insurance) policies that people are now claiming back.

Also, check the small print of your home contents insurance policy. A lot now cover personal possessions outside of the house such as laptops, phones, etc.

10 months ago

in o2 isn’t bothering with the Nokia N96 on Mobile Industry Review
I discussed getting the N96 with the O2 retention department a couple of weeks ago and they said that it had been delayed until October as they had "found issues" with it on the network. I therefore asked about the Samsung Omnia, and again they said they weren't currently going to stock that either! Congrats to O2, they have now just lost a customer to Vodafone as we don't all just want an iPhone! Perhaps they need to rename themselves to i2 instead of O2!
Returning? Login