http://disqus.com/people/cd9816e69b6173374bb7b40da82eec43/enFri, 17 Jul 2009 19:22:11 -0000http://tlf.disqus.com/google_fakes_compliance_with_privacy_law_obscure_blogger_demands_investigation_developing/#comment-1454844Chill, dude. Google links to their privacy center, which contains the privacy policy for all the sites they own and operate. Furthermore, they provide a link to plain-English description and highlight points of their privacy policy from the page they are linking to. What they're doing is far better than the 5 pages of pure legal-speak that most sites have which only serve to confuse and frustrate us non-lawyer types. I applaud Google for having a user-friendly privacy center. You're being pedantic, and quite frankly, if they were sued over this, I think a judge would laugh the plaintiff out of the court room.AnthonySat, 05 Jul 2008 16:15:45 -0000http://mashable.disqus.com/big_brother_amazon_remotely_deletes_1984_from_kindles/#comment-12855326The irony of this is almost too thick to cut through. This is absolutely unacceptable, and Amazon must recant this position. Once books are legitimately purchased, it is decidedly wrong and completely unethical to even have the power to perform an action such as this. This cannot be tolerated. <br><br>Please flood the Kindle product page with negative reviews so that prospective buyers can be aware of this jaw dropping breach of trust and display of power:<br><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Kindle-Amazons-Wireless-Reading-Generation/dp/B00154JDAI/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Kindle-Amazons-Wireless-R...</a><br><br>While I have long taken a stance against DRM, this is horrifying and cannot and should not be tolerated by anybody, out of principle if nothing else. I sincerely hope this results in a class-action lawsuit.AnthonyFri, 17 Jul 2009 19:22:11 -0000