DISQUS

Can't wait to see an English version

Congrats!

I had never realized what the plan was of. Thanks for pointing it out. I'll take a closer look next time I walk Cy in the park

A couple of questions. Neat concept but why does she have to send the photo somewhere to get her results? Seems like an unnecessary step. Why didn't the phone just work it out upon photo-capture?

My initial experience with SnapTell is good. Great idea, works well with US books.

Here, here

Matthias Weber from PSFK Germany in the house

What are these "potential people"? Half baked folk?

I can't see the video. Does my Firefox browser have to be differentized to watch? And why?

Always?

Oh come on, this is naive. Ever stood on a Tube platform? Ever watched an ad between TV shows?

Spike Lee at Aple Soho:
http://www.psfk.com/2007/06/johnny-spike-get-th...

http://www.psfk.com

Business Intelligence? Being there when a new store opens, asking customers on the street about certain brands etc. I suppose it's about broadcasting around a niche angle.

This isn't a celebration of brands using the blogosphere - this is a celebration of blogs behaving badly. Gizmodo misled its readers deliberately in order ot hype traffic. The rest of the web followed it. If Cisco had a hand in it, then this is even worse than we think.

Gotta agree with disenchantedtech. We're going to be pulling our entertainment media from some big server farm in the air. Not actually physically owning it ourself.

No one cares... no one wants a YouTube from Microsoft, no one wants a music player. People just want Microsoft to make their computers work well. That's it. It simply doesn't matter if this is faster, better, happier. No one cares.

Microsoft again wastes money misunderstandign who they are.

We had the same argument with Tailrank. Sometimes the best thing to do is out them until something better comes along:

http://www.psfk.com/2006/08/note_to_tailran.html

Amazing - the Blog Business Summit offers no way for you to contact the BLOGGER! LOL a LOT.

They obviously need your help RS

The problem with the model is that Microsoft assumes that the future of advertising is advertising. But it's not: the slow painful death of TV Advertising is just the start of the decline of one way brand dialog. Banners on sites, no matter how relevant, are still old advertising.

I think the product would sell better if in fact it was called what I first thought it was called when I read this post: the Nathan Gold!!

Why do you need a first life if you can watch (user generated) TV in SL? With friends that look like little furry rabbits:

Video: http://www.psfk.com/2006/04/watching_live_u.html

Target, BMW, Apple aren't crafted by ad departments. They're crafted by the fact that everyone is involved in the brand. They live and breathe it. They actually do what you say: the brands were "done for the love of it"

To say, that we've created 'bullsh*t filters' for good design ignores the huge design trend permeating society: Method products, the next Dodge Challenger, American Apparel, the rise of the prefab. There's so much love of good design these days - you may think you've cracked it with your website design, but to me the apparent absence of any care whatsoever, says that you have little love for what you do.