<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ccheath</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ccheath/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ccheath/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 08:59:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Watch 2017 Redbull Thre3style US Winner DJ Ease&amp;#8217;s Routine</title><link>http://djtechtools.com/2017/12/07/watch-2017-redbull-thre3style-us-winner-dj-eases-routine/#comment-3897413096</link><description>&lt;p&gt;loved this set, and totally agree with the judges forgiving the tiny mistakes in performance and rewarding the excellent DJing...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 08:59:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marco Tempest Wins Merlin</title><link>http://itricks.com/news/2010/08/marco-tempest-wins-merlin/#comment-68537048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;typo&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:34:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marco Tempest Wins Merlin</title><link>http://itricks.com/news/2010/08/marco-tempest-wins-merlin/#comment-68536857</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes well deserved recognition&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:33:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Ordering Drinks Without Ice Cheating? | The Atlantic Wire</title><link>http://www.theatlanticwire.com/features/view/feature/read-more-1706#comment-65353918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sure, but the chai should be chilled over ice at least - not served warm, no?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:21:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When do you throw a CEO&amp;#8217;s privacy under the bus?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/05/23/when-do-you-throw-a-ceos-privacy-under-the-bus/#comment-51638200</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Depends on the state you're in -- &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recordin...&lt;/a&gt; -- not that many states (only 12) have two-party notification ... and the federal law is one-party notification ... personally I agree with the federal law and the other 38 states that i can record a call without telling the other person that i'm recording ... helped a friend of mine a few years ago with a divorce where his soon-to-be-ex-wife was lying so she could get the kids and collect child support/alimony and we had to prove it in court -- if we had to tell her we were recording the phone calls with her we wouldn't have been able to prove she was lying&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 17:04:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The most under-hyped, but most important, technology since seat belts</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/01/03/the-most-under-hyped-but-most-important-technology-since-seat-belts/#comment-28407807</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, have you tried out the Distronic system from Mercedes? I saw the Top Gear show do a test a year or two ago where the car sets a distance from the car ahead and just keeps that distance (higher distance for higher speeds).  He got off the highway and ended up in a line at a stop sign at the top of the offramp and the car just comes to a stop perfectly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apparently you have to re-engage the system to start crawling again if you do come to  a stop.  There's lots of youtube videos of owners who love to show off this system.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:34:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The most under-hyped, but most important, technology since seat belts</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/01/03/the-most-under-hyped-but-most-important-technology-since-seat-belts/#comment-28344263</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great points jmangan, just one flaw in your logic that i noticed in your last paragraph.  You say that airline defect rate tolerance is in the 1-in-1,000,000,000 'hours of operation' then go on to say that with so many cars out there on the roads in relation to the number of planes that there would be more failures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the 'hours of operation' is the key to this.  how many hours of operation do you think that a normal car goes through ... it's in the tens of thousands by the time the car breaks down ... not even close to a million of hours of operation.  With more cars on the road than planes in the skies that does up the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;if the car companies can get autonomous cars with the defect tolerances that the airlines have i'll get in line&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;maybe my statistical analysis is a bit off since yes more cars on the road than planes in the sky means higher volume but the fault tolerances don't take volume into account (afaik)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:05:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The most under-hyped, but most important, technology since seat belts</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/01/03/the-most-under-hyped-but-most-important-technology-since-seat-belts/#comment-28003166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ford IS explaining it... you just said you didn't care to watch the video!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:41:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The most under-hyped, but most important, technology since seat belts</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/01/03/the-most-under-hyped-but-most-important-technology-since-seat-belts/#comment-28002382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;if you don't have the time to watch the video that explains all this i'm sorry, but i just don't have the time to explain it all to you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:34:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The most under-hyped, but most important, technology since seat belts</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/01/03/the-most-under-hyped-but-most-important-technology-since-seat-belts/#comment-27999505</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Volvo is owned by Ford (they're trying to sell it though, apparently).  In the video the guy talks a bit about how Volvo customers are more of a niche group looking for as much safety as possible so they can put more into the systems.  But the Ford customers are a more diverse group and like Otto some do not want the vehicle to be taking any actions on their part.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:46:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The most under-hyped, but most important, technology since seat belts</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/01/03/the-most-under-hyped-but-most-important-technology-since-seat-belts/#comment-27999077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's my understanding of the Ford system after watching the videos.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) you can turn it off &lt;br&gt;2) it does not apply the brake (just makes sure that you get max stopping power if you do brake)&lt;br&gt;3) the reason they don't do the toyota 'partial braking' is to deter people like you from turning off the system&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;so ... watch the videos (again if you already did) and listen carefully&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:42:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The most under-hyped, but most important, technology since seat belts</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2010/01/03/the-most-under-hyped-but-most-important-technology-since-seat-belts/#comment-27951472</link><description>&lt;p&gt;who else noticed the juxtaposition of the chevy ad before the interview with the ford guy? haha&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:37:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Videos &amp;gt; Highlights from Wildwood, N.J. - eGuiders. We Search. You Watch.</title><link>http://www.eguiders.com/video/highlights-from-wildwood-n-j#comment-26751974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice find... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:12:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The chat room/forum problem (&amp;#038; an apology to @Technosailor)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/the-chat-roomforum-problem-an-apology-to-technosailor/#comment-21760281</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're exactly right.  Photo tagging should be opt-in not opt-out.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:51:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The chat room/forum problem (&amp;#038; an apology to @Technosailor)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/the-chat-roomforum-problem-an-apology-to-technosailor/#comment-21643351</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, like victor was saying, he's on a private mailing list.  They're probably not going to change, but could have a real-time private channel over on friendfeed.  I do kind of get what you're saying about the WTF factor, but I would explain it as a backchannel for the backchannel.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:50:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The chat room/forum problem (&amp;#038; an apology to @Technosailor)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/the-chat-roomforum-problem-an-apology-to-technosailor/#comment-21633829</link><description>&lt;p&gt;friendfeed has private rooms - i would bet that there's a lot of very interesting stuff going on in private on friendfeed&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:39:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The chat room/forum problem (&amp;#038; an apology to @Technosailor)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/the-chat-roomforum-problem-an-apology-to-technosailor/#comment-21631657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you're referring to the "eternal september", right? &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_September" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_September"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:37:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The chat room/forum problem (&amp;#038; an apology to @Technosailor)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/the-chat-roomforum-problem-an-apology-to-technosailor/#comment-21629429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FriendFeed is still the best platform online for communication (IMHO).  This problem you're just now re-discovering can be dealt with on friendfeed as you explain (but as one of the reasons you were blindsided: "For two, we had decentralized moderation (I can delete any comment underneath my items, and I can hide any items that come into my view)." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So the feature that can fix the problem kept you from seeing the problem?  Isn't that the point of the feature?  This problem isn't one that can be cured with a vaccine.  And you're right that with sufficient control you can engineer it out of your site, but on a public forum you can't be friendfeed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sounds to me like you want a large private friendfeed room, but you can't get everyone over there so you're just giving up and going back to twitter where they are (mostly).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:35:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scoble, Stop Trolling FriendFeed</title><link>http://pagesaresocial.com/2009/11/01/scoble-stop-trolling-friendfeed/#comment-21606838</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for that Holden... just what i wanted to read after getting to the bottom of that post ... i had been putting it off since i knew what i would be in for&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:03:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital iPhone cheapskates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/10/digital-iphone-cheapskates/#comment-19841747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess it's a good thing I never paid for Tweetie 1.0 then... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:13:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I am uncomfortable when math has actual numbers in it</title><link>http://shoesonwrong.tumblr.com/post/206391605#comment-19711042</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A prime number conversation turned to code last night as my friend decided to post his &lt;a href="http://digitalfoo.net/posts/2009/10/Function_to_Check_if_a_Number_is_Prime/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://digitalfoo.net/posts/2009/10/Function_to_Check_if_a_Number_is_Prime/"&gt;prime check function in 8 lines of C&lt;/a&gt; (in 23 total lines).  The computation is fairly easy to check if a number is prime (for a computer).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am tempted to ask him to run 2^43112609-1 and 43112609 through his algorithm and time how long it takes to confirm the prime.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I am uncomfortable when math has actual numbers in it</title><link>http://shoesonwrong.tumblr.com/post/206391605#comment-19428268</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=largest+known+prime" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=largest+known+prime"&gt;http://www.wolframalpha.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:54:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My web site is my space (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/03/myWebSiteIsMySpace.html#comment-18370718</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They are (to an extent) on a level playing field.  Disqus can create a toolbar/browserplugin that 'enhances' sites that don't have the Disqus plugin already.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It seems to me that you're objecting to something because Google is behind it and that means that it will have a greater chance of becoming mainstream.  If SideWiki was a greasemonkey script you wouldn't have a problem with it because not a whole lot of people would be using it, right?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:45:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My web site is my space (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/03/myWebSiteIsMySpace.html#comment-18368380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google should allow for a meta tag so that you can opt-out of this 'service' -- but they probably won't.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like a friend of mine says: "Google is the new Microsoft"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:14:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The post iPhone world</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/09/19/the-post-iphone-world/#comment-16953594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i don't like the idea of an IV machine being on twitter... just doesn't seem like the right way to do it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Heath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:35:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>