<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ccheath</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-d25f8c45" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/ccheath/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:51:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The chat room/forum problem (&amp;#038; an apology to @Technosailor)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/the-chat-roomforum-problem-an-apology-to-technosailor/#comment-21760281</link><description>You're exactly right.  Photo tagging should be opt-in not opt-out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:51:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The chat room/forum problem (&amp;#038; an apology to @Technosailor)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/the-chat-roomforum-problem-an-apology-to-technosailor/#comment-21643351</link><description>Well, like victor was saying, he's on a private mailing list.  They're probably not going to change, but could have a real-time private channel over on friendfeed.  I do kind of get what you're saying about the WTF factor, but I would explain it as a backchannel for the backchannel.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:50:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The chat room/forum problem (&amp;#038; an apology to @Technosailor)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/the-chat-roomforum-problem-an-apology-to-technosailor/#comment-21633829</link><description>friendfeed has private rooms - i would bet that there's a lot of very interesting stuff going on in private on friendfeed</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:39:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The chat room/forum problem (&amp;#038; an apology to @Technosailor)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/the-chat-roomforum-problem-an-apology-to-technosailor/#comment-21631657</link><description>you're referring to the "eternal september", right? &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_September" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_September&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:37:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The chat room/forum problem (&amp;#038; an apology to @Technosailor)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/the-chat-roomforum-problem-an-apology-to-technosailor/#comment-21629429</link><description>FriendFeed is still the best platform online for communication (IMHO).  This problem you're just now re-discovering can be dealt with on friendfeed as you explain (but as one of the reasons you were blindsided: "For two, we had decentralized moderation (I can delete any comment underneath my items, and I can hide any items that come into my view)." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So the feature that can fix the problem kept you from seeing the problem?  Isn't that the point of the feature?  This problem isn't one that can be cured with a vaccine.  And you're right that with sufficient control you can engineer it out of your site, but on a public forum you can't be friendfeed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sounds to me like you want a large private friendfeed room, but you can't get everyone over there so you're just giving up and going back to twitter where they are (mostly).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:35:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scoble, Stop Trolling FriendFeed</title><link>http://pagesaresocial.com/2009/11/01/scoble-stop-trolling-friendfeed/#comment-21606838</link><description>Thanks for that Holden... just what i wanted to read after getting to the bottom of that post ... i had been putting it off since i knew what i would be in for</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:03:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital iPhone cheapskates</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/10/digital-iphone-cheapskates/#comment-19841747</link><description>I guess it's a good thing I never paid for Tweetie 1.0 then...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:13:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Miley Cyrus Quits Twitter, Raps About It [YouTube Video]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/10/miley-cyrus-quits-twitter-video/#comment-19797870</link><description>this just confirms for me why i'm glad that i don't care about ms. cyrus - so she wants to keep her private life private? then why was she typing private things into twitter? dumb if you ask me... dumb all the way around.  And shouldn't she be in school right now?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:54:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I am uncomfortable when math has actual numbers in it</title><link>http://shoesonwrong.tumblr.com/post/206391605#comment-19711042</link><description>Exactly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A prime number conversation turned to code last night as my friend decided to post his &lt;a href="http://digitalfoo.net/posts/2009/10/Function_to_Check_if_a_Number_is_Prime/" rel="nofollow"&gt;prime check function in 8 lines of C&lt;/a&gt; (in 23 total lines).  The computation is fairly easy to check if a number is prime (for a computer).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am tempted to ask him to run 2^43112609-1 and 43112609 through his algorithm and time how long it takes to confirm the prime.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I am uncomfortable when math has actual numbers in it</title><link>http://shoesonwrong.tumblr.com/post/206391605#comment-19428268</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=largest+known+prime" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=largest+kn...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:54:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My web site is my space (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/03/myWebSiteIsMySpace.html#comment-18370718</link><description>They are (to an extent) on a level playing field.  Disqus can create a toolbar/browserplugin that 'enhances' sites that don't have the Disqus plugin already.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems to me that you're objecting to something because Google is behind it and that means that it will have a greater chance of becoming mainstream.  If SideWiki was a greasemonkey script you wouldn't have a problem with it because not a whole lot of people would be using it, right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:45:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My web site is my space (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/03/myWebSiteIsMySpace.html#comment-18368380</link><description>Google should allow for a meta tag so that you can opt-out of this 'service' -- but they probably won't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like a friend of mine says: "Google is the new Microsoft"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:14:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The post iPhone world</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/09/19/the-post-iphone-world/#comment-16953594</link><description>i don't like the idea of an IV machine being on twitter... just doesn't seem like the right way to do it</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:35:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I have 3,571 tweets that show that Twitter isn&amp;#8217;t for lunch anymore</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/09/17/i-have-3571-tweets-that-show-that-twitter-isnt-for-lunch-anymore/#comment-16882783</link><description>twitter has NOT won robert... they've definitely got something - but what that is has yet to be seen</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:37:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I have 3,571 tweets that show that Twitter isn&amp;#8217;t for lunch anymore</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/09/17/i-have-3571-tweets-that-show-that-twitter-isnt-for-lunch-anymore/#comment-16860908</link><description>but what about drupal mailing lists? but more seriously tracking twitter is really where is think the value is - i know that's gillmor's line, but it's one of the few things i'm pretty sure he's right about --- a drupal dev can get a lot more out of keyword tracks on twitter, friendfeed, and the federated (&lt;a href="http://status.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;status.net&lt;/a&gt; formerly laconi.ca) microblogs than just twitter --- tracking ads value because you don't have to follow people -- businesses that only want a mailing list of contacts 'don't get it' -- twitter allows for the interaction with that mailing list which is some value, but twitter's 'monopoly' on the microblogging 'market' isn't a good thing in the long run (IMHO as usual)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:15:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I have 3,571 tweets that show that Twitter isn&amp;#8217;t for lunch anymore</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/09/17/i-have-3571-tweets-that-show-that-twitter-isnt-for-lunch-anymore/#comment-16859929</link><description>#8 is why you don't 'need' twitter as an rss reader - techmems's rss is all you need to stay informed about tech - for that matter, substitute mashable, thenextweb, technologizer - twitter's only 'needed' unless you want to get that info 30 seconds faster.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do think that twitter serves a purpose, but in my opinion an open and federated microblogging system is better than the twitter silo.  That doesn't mean twitter should go away, but if they won't federate, then i hope they become myspace to the federated system's facebook.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now wouldn't that be nice?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:49:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Not Twitter, Is The REAL Real-Time Search Engine</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/friendfeed-not-twitter-is-the-real-real-time-search-engine/#comment-16105421</link><description>so... you have a tweet and stumble 'share this' but not one for friendfeed... oh the irony! - but not to worry, friendfeed has a very sweet bookmarklet that i can use on any page</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:09:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real time comments will piss off pro bloggers (at first)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/08/25/real-time-comments-will-piss-off-pro-bloggers-at-first/#comment-15373561</link><description>Robert, another thing i've just been noticing since using the 'new' diqus today is that the comments don't seem to come into my email in the order that they were posted.. maybe i'm wrong here, but it's not nearly as smooth as friendfeed's email notifications.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:08:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real time comments will piss off pro bloggers (at first)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/08/25/real-time-comments-will-piss-off-pro-bloggers-at-first/#comment-15373497</link><description>no way should we get paid for commenting on robert's site - that's just ridiculous and makes me wonder about the rest of your comment</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:06:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real time comments will piss off pro bloggers (at first)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/08/25/real-time-comments-will-piss-off-pro-bloggers-at-first/#comment-15372674</link><description>I like this disqus theme too, but the real-time comments are too 'thick' or tall... works better on FF where you can fit a lot more comments into the same amount of space</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:50:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real time comments will piss off pro bloggers (at first)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/08/25/real-time-comments-will-piss-off-pro-bloggers-at-first/#comment-15372031</link><description>interesting idea there robert... and i understand your logic - the average joe (like me) however, will turn these features on without a thought - and there's many many more of us than those who have page view business models</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:36:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus Forks Into Two Products, Launches Revamped Real-Time Comment System</title><link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/25/disqus-forks-into-two-products-launches-revamped-real-time-comment-system/#comment-15364840</link><description>I like this new version of disqus... it will definitely keep me from moving to Echo (for now)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Comment Widget</title><link>http://www.pathawks.com/2008/06/friendfeed-comment-widget.html#comment-15107702</link><description>somehow i missed that bar across the top of the page... doh</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:49:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Comment Widget</title><link>http://www.pathawks.com/2008/06/friendfeed-comment-widget.html#comment-15105296</link><description>disqus and backtype aren't available on blogspot are they?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:28:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To User: Your Life is Empty [Pic]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/15/facebook-life-empty/#comment-14949771</link><description>yeah i'd bet that it's a setup/staged as well... kind of obvious</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccheath</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:21:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>