DISQUS

DISQUS Hello!  The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.

Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.

Tyler Willis's picture

Unregistered

Feeds

aliases

  • Tyler Willis
  • Tyler Willis
  • admin
  • Tyler Willis
  • Tyler Willis
  • tyler willis
  • Tyler Willis

Tyler Willis

4 months ago

in Jedi Mind Tricks: How to Get $250,000 of Advertising for $10,000 on The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
@tim you might be able to use www.skribit.com for the suggestion @clemence made. I don't have any affiliation with them, but it's a friend's company and it seems to be pretty useful.

It creates a sidebar widget that allows users to suggest and vote up/down potential topics.

5 months ago

in 57 Internet Possibilities to Investigate on Chris Brogan
Hey Chris,

For project management I use Pivotal Tracker and absolutely love it.

8 months ago

in 2008/10/31/halloween-logos-2008/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
google's was done by wes craven

8 months ago

in 2008/10/31/halloween-logos-2008/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
google's is up -- most obvious one to check if ya ask me

11 months ago

in SF Startup Drinks Pics on Jacob Morgan on Social Media, Technology, Marketing, and Life
Did you claim credit for my photos? Super Weak!

That final slide should read "Tyler Willis stole my camera and created an artistic masterpiece with his ubelievable eye and awesome talent"

"This picture sucks, but don't blame me -- Tyler Willis took it" would also be acceptable

:)

11 months ago

in 2008/07/08/involver-video-widget-ad/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
I want to thank you all again for getting involved in the discussion. I'm really excited about the fact that we are taking practical steps in what I think we all agree is the right direction.

Hopefully we'll continue to push in that direction along with help from other people within the industry.

Thanks for supporting us in taking these steps, and please don't hesitate to ever email me if I can answer a question or if you have a suggestion.

Best,
Tyler Willis
tyler@involver.com

12 months ago

in 2008/07/08/involver-video-widget-ad/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
Gennefer,

Thanks for engaging in the discussion! I think we share a view of what's ideal, and that's a true, uninhibited, two-way communication between providers and customers.

The advertisers we talk to are starting to understand that as an industry, we are moving towards this, and in some cases they have started to embrace this and make decisions to implement this.

This shift will take time, but are looking forward to watching this change become more mainstream and more permanent, and we are committed to being part of this change.

Thanks again!
Tyler Willis

12 months ago

in 2008/07/08/involver-video-widget-ad/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
Gennefer,

I think we agree, and you may be surprised to find that most of the advertisers I've met agree with you as well. It's clear that content is king in this day in age, and maybe even more so a company must be sincere in an offer for 2-way communication.

The Involver platform works because of many reasons, but one of the reasons we've kept our pilot program is we want to make sure people understand the requirements of a successful marketing campaign -- from good creative all the way to interacting with viewers daily through dynamic plug-ins like the discussion center (which can be added to any video using Involver).

Take a look at the player on our homepage (www.involver.com), I think you'll see that it's more than just clever packaging :)

Tyler Willis, Involver
1 reply
Gennefer Snowfield Tyler,

Thanks for your thoughtful reply to my comment. There is no denying that the technology and delivery platform for Involver are sound -- impressive even. But as a fellow marketer, as well as consumer and avid social network user, I'm of the opinion that even a sexy wrapper won't sustain in the long run, lest of all if the 'interactive' features are intrusive (why should I bother taking the time/effort to download a plug-in so that you can push even more sales copy at me?).

Each day on Facebook, there is a new 'hook' to get me to look at an ad/click-thru to a website, each containing personal data re: my age, location, psychographics -- even my musical tastes. But I gave none of that information to the advertiser. It was all aggregated by information in my profile or from my IP address, and while the ads do effectively target me, they are still just talking AT me. I am not part of the conversation; I am merely a recipient of information. Users are too savvy today and see right through that brand of invasive marketing.

Near as I can tell without a more thorough review of your service, the same is true for Involver. It doesn't *involve* me any more deeply [save for aforementioned plug-ins that are really just video-enhanced 'talking heads'], it just offers a way to present the content differently.

That being said, I think there are likely many ways in which to harness the Involver tool toward a productive two-way conversation with end users, and sincerely hope that these progressive, forward-thinking advertisers of which you speak will begin leading that charge. But truth be told, I'm not so much concerned with the delivery platform of a message as I am if it is relevant/meaningful to me, and the only way to ensure that is by ASKING me, and then GIVING me what I want/need/value sans your own agenda. I think advertisers get stuck in an old sales paradigm, not fully grasping that it's about understanding your customers' needs and fulfilling them. Sales are merely a by-product of that communication. Corporate America calls it 'consultative selling' or the like, but it all boils down to humans interacting with humans -- not computers or companies, or even flashy, digital delusions designed to distract, detract and deflect from the dollars that are dubiously driving the distribution.

Much luck with your product and I hope that Involver can ignite a new wave of content-focused advertising with the USER in mind.

All the best,

Gennefer

12 months ago

in 2008/07/08/involver-video-widget-ad/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
Thanks for the write-up Kristen, I think you really summed up the problem people are facing and the need that exists for truly engaging and interactive marketing experiences.

We think our plug-in approach is a really powerful one, and I think it's key is in it's simplicity -- it's a problem that all marketers either have now or will likely have soon and our platform allows them to tackle that issue easily and effectively.

Our clients have seen success in the form of higher engagement with their audience, and I think that will only keep growing.

I look forward to continuing the discussion here on Mashable and sharing new information with you as we continue to innovate in this space.

Thanks Again Kristen,
Tyler Willis
Director of Marketing, Involver
tyler@involver.com

1 year ago

in FriendFeed Supports MP3 Feeds - Joe Lazarus on JOE LAZ: Comments
In terms of reducing FriendFeed noise, I found that be hiding all twitters, the service became much more usable. Just an idea.
1 reply
Joe Lazarus's picture
Joe Lazarus Yeah, that helps. I also like their new "best of" feature that shows just the popular posts for the day or week, but they need a lot more filtering and sorting options.

1 year ago

in Remiel: Netflix Says They're Sorry on Remiel.info
surprisingly enough, that's not been true in my experience. Even when presented the opportunity to call, most consumers don't (esp. if they're problem has been fixed.

1 year ago

in 2008/05/21/caption-this-utr-contest/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
***Alt-tab*** ***Alt-tab***

No I wasn't looking at that, it was a pop-up, I swear!!

1 year ago

in 2008/05/21/15-online-tools-for-the-perfect-prom/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
Add Facebook Groups. My friend's daughter has a group of 200 girls from her class and they are posting photos of dresses they buy so that no one will have the same dress.

1 year ago

in We Need Your Help on The Lijit Blog
Seems like standards would dictate on the left, and in a photo the important content is the picture itself. So in a culture that reads left to right I think pic on the left is better.

1 year ago

in Win a Nokia N82 Prize Package! on Tyler's Toolbox
Yes Mike, the deadline was yesterday. I encourage you to shoot them anyway.

1 year ago

in Win a Nokia N82 Prize Package! on Tyler's Toolbox
Hey,

Just got some love from the job, and decided - hey we work in video, why not sweeten the pot? So...

I’ll also personally give you two free hours of consulting time figuring out your goals and developing a strategy for using mobile video and video promotion to help that AND one free year of RapOuts Premium Promotion.

With the N82, that's now $2,000 worth of prizes. Get those films in!!

:)
Tyler

1 year ago

in Hi! I am Micah’s Brain Defect. My Name Is Andrew. I Like Coffee. on Learn To Duck
You've single handedly written my entire top ten of "posts that mention Andrew and make me laugh" with this piece. congrats.

In more serious matters, I wish you good fortune with finding the right amount/type of medication and hope it works well.

1 year ago

in Happy Japanese April Fool’s Day! on The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
Ask me what makes a good comedian.

"What makes a goo..." "TIMING!"

Not sure how well that joke will translate online. Regardless, great joke - don't worry about being a day off.

1 year ago

in Saving Money On Startups on A VC
Another option is to use a re-routing number service (such as GrandCentral) and forward to your employees cell phone. Much cheaper then getting lines installed, and you go in and change the forwarding number if an employee leaves.
1 reply
fredwilson's picture
fredwilson Very nice idea. I like it. Does it eliminate cell phone charges for your employees?

1 year ago

in Never Apologize for Your Chicken on Tyler's Toolbox
I migrated this post from my original blog and lost the comments. The following comment was posted by Wayne Willis, my father, on August 28th 2006 at 630am:



Super point. I remember, during one "media training" session I went through, the same point got made: "Never start a speech with an apology." The chicken story makes the same point more vividly ... and therefore, better. I remember finding this "rule" counterintuitive at first, but absolutely correct in practice.

It's a subset of "always be positive" -- or make your points positively, not negative. Use AND not BUT when you can in an argument.

Another point, during the same training session, was "don't thank the audience for letting you speak to them. They should appreciate that you did." That also seemed contrary to good manners to me, but, again, it's absolutely correct. You don't need to be arrogant, but thanking THEM undercuts their invitation of you as someone they want to hear from.

I'm always surprised by how most guests on talk shows (e.g., promoting a book or simply providing expert commentary on a subject) respond to hosts who end the interview with "thank you." The guests invariably respond with "[no], thank YOU" instead of the more correct, and obvious "you're welcome." It seems to me that the latter response is correct on a number of levels.

1 year ago

in Pitching Guy Kawasaki in an Elevator on Andrew Hyde
Haha, that's probably the funniest thing I've seen all day. Awesome!

1 year ago

in Its Micah? What Did You Expect? Teddy Bears? on Learn To Duck
Here's the difference. You may be a dick, for the reasons you've explained. I'm an asshole, because I want to publicly call into question the grammar of your title. Did you really mean to question if it was you, or did you mean to have "what did you expect" modify "It's Micah."

;)

1 year ago

in Biggest Blogging Mistakes of 07 | Andrew Hyde - Humble Yet Bold on Andrew Hyde
"I am most not 100% defiantly OMG not an expert on really anything." Andrew, you are DEFINITELY defiant. ;)

"If Twitter has taught us anything in 2007 it is that people like to follow, wait for it, people. If you are blogging as your company, blog as a person at the company, not as the company. Same rules ring true at Twitter." Possibly the most important thing you've written. Not only is this important for how people start to act online (properly), it's also why startups like twitter, tumblr and others are the next wave of success. Easy publishing is great, but making it easy and acceptable to share your personality is much more important.

Also @Josh20 Disqus is great, as is Intense Debate, both work. ;)

1 year ago

in Startup The Show: #6 The Power of Doing it Now on Startup Weekend
So I was sitting down, right? And I decided to talk about this startup thing, right? We all thought it was pretty cool, right? Andrew thought it would be worth podcasting, right? So he set up the computer and begin recording, right? And Apparently, I can't talk to a computer without seeking validation after everything I say.

Right?

1 year ago

in Startup The Show: #5 Conversation on Startup Weekend
Right on in railing against tweetspam, turned notifications off on Guy Kawasaki for that exact reason. His reason for the spam? "Twitter is the 4th largest referral of traffic to truemors."

It's a fine line though, the people I've seen that really benefit, pick their battles. One or two links a week seems to be the sweet spot. Truthfully, I'm more likely to share a link over twitter, because it's passive (as opposed to email) which is why we are seeing a lot of people sharing through twitter and a lot of traffic coming from twitter.

I think twitter works well for that "what is interesting to me right now" quick thought. It is interesting in that niche, and the moment someone's noise to signal ratio drops low, you can un-follow them.

Also, according to a friend who's a little more e-famous then I am has notified me that the right ratio is 4:1 (for every 4 people that follow you, you should follow 1 of them). Apparently that makes you look important on the interwebs.

See you guys next weekend, looking forward to meeting you Rana.

Cheers,
Tyler

re: lodging. Just bring sleeping bags :)
Returning? Login