<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for captained</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/captained/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/captained/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:18:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Rush Limbaugh the New Michael Moore?</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.com/26837/is-rush-limbaugh-the-new-michael-moore/#comment-6857059</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Come on, folks, this was a JOKE.  Anyone not getting that even without Jazz's explanation needs a humor implant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:18:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Road Goes Ever On</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017106.php#comment-177460</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm hoping you come with, along with Teresa, Tom Shipley, and other rational dissenters.  I want the whole CapQ community to join me at Hot Air.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:49:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bring Your No-Doz</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017083.php#comment-173066</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh, not in the manner the troll uses it here, and I think you know that.  One can have a conversation about race, and then one can stand around accusing people of being racists for having the conversation.  The troll is doing the latter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:53:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bring Your No-Doz</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017083.php#comment-173009</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You really are obsessed by skin color, aren't you?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:20:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Irrelevancy Of Mrs. Obama's College Thesis</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017074.php#comment-169533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, "olde fart", anyway, especially according to my son ....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:56:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Michael Needs To Meet His Match</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017068.php#comment-168750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He doesn't have a kidney.  His only one had to be removed.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:05:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sadr To Extend Cease-Fire?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017059.php#comment-168177</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bogey, do not repost articles in the comments.  It's a copyright violation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:42:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain: No Romance, No Influence, No Meetings</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017057.php#comment-166968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, they had two disgruntled former employees who won't go on the record, and the one named source says his meeting had nothing to do with an inappropriate relationship -- which he told the Times months ago.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That passes the Shipley test?  Oh, wait, it's about a Republican, of course it does.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:49:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Coming Obama 'Theocracy'</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017003.php#comment-165891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kathy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's this cool thing on the Interwebby doohickey called &lt;i&gt;links&lt;/i&gt;.  When I include one, you click it, and then read the source material.  "Where's the evidence" questions reveal your vapidity when I've linked to it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:47:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don't Try The Sausages At Joe Delucci's</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017049.php#comment-165342</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The first rule of Fight Club is .... you don't talk about Fight Club.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:46:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did McCain's Win Doom Their November Strategy?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017044.php#comment-164643</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How can you hate SPAM?  A nice fried SPAM sandwich with lettuce, tomato, &amp;amp; mayo?  Mmmmmm .......&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:21:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Buying It</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017039.php#comment-163628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reagan certainly did, and you apparently didn't read the rest of my post -- when I noted that people can be really proud of the history of this country, too.  If it didn't happen in our lifetime (she and I are about the same age), why should that keep it from part of what makes us really proud about this nation?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:49:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Musharraf Not Quitting</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017037.php#comment-162944</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not arguing that Musharraf should resign.  Why don't you try reading the post again?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:38:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wisconsin Primary Live Blog</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017034.php#comment-162793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, she said she has never been really proud to be an American before now.  There is a big difference between the two.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:53:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fidel Retires</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017023.php#comment-159750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Raul's a pimp.  Fidel has run Cuba except in spot times when he hasn't been conscious.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:14:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Coming Obama 'Theocracy'</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017003.php#comment-155595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What part of "Americans are not in debt because they live frivolously but because someone got sick." are you incapable of understanding?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:26:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Coming Obama 'Theocracy'</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017003.php#comment-154430</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To answer two of Teresa's points:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. Mrs. Obama asserted that the cause of credit card debt is health care, which is absurd.  Of course some people use credit cards for medication and treatment, but it's hardly the leading component of debt.  It's sheer demagoguery to assert that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Mr. Obama also said that her husband is the only candidate who understands that our souls are broken.  Who is Barack Obama to judge anyone's soul but his own?  What arrogance!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. You'll notice that Mike Huckabee isn't getting a lot of Republicans to vote for him with that rhetoric.  On the other hand, the Democrats are literally swooning over Barack Obama, despite their criticisms of Huckabee.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:47:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Is Killing All Of The Great Jihadis Of The Ummah?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016998.php#comment-153557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That works, too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:05:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: House Democrats Leave Security On The Table</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016990.php#comment-152560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes it has.  The FISA court ruled that anything passing through American switches requires a warrant, even if foreign-to-foreign.  That was why the FISA reform got taken up last year, and why its expiration now will require warrants for foreign surveillance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Really, try to keep up, OK?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:59:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: House Democrats Leave Security On The Table</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016990.php#comment-151758</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An extension for what?  The Senate passed a bipartisan bill on Tuesday, and we've already had one two-week extension so that Congress could get their act together.  All they need to do is vote on the bill the Senate already passed, six months after everyone knew this would come up now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lame, lame, lame.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:17:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: John Lewis Begins March To Obama</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016988.php#comment-151610</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tom, I'll give Lewis a little room here; &lt;i&gt;every&lt;/i&gt; elected Democrat in Congress is a superdelegate.  Ted Kennedy endorsed Obama before Massachusetts, for instance, and he's a superdelegate.  I don't want to make Lewis sound worse than anyone else for endorsing a candidate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It does, as you say, point out the problem with the superdelegate structure in the DNC.  My point was more that Lewis' explanation for switching now indicates that he shouldn't have been endorsing anyone to begin with.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:24:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Hill Is Alive In The State Of Wisconsin</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016971.php#comment-147591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; try writing eight or nine of these a day for five years!  A faulty meter is going to happen from time to time .... ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:33:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clinton Ignores Losses, Gets Booed</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016964.php#comment-146408</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's always room for Jell-O!  Enjoy these moments ... they don't come back.  Well, they do with grandkids, of course!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:38:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clinton Ignores Losses, Gets Booed</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016964.php#comment-145451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Obama will be tougher to beat than Hillary, but I see him as a beatable opponent.  Like Keemo, I like him a lot more than Hillary, and I respect him more as well.  I think he's a better person.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fear?  Not anywhere near as much.  If he won, he's a man we can work with.  It wouldn't be the end of the world.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:23:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Little Beyond A Normal Endorsement</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016960.php#comment-145183</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone appointed by the state governor -- Janet Napolitano, a Democrat?  No thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captained</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:00:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>