<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Ray Grieselhuber</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/c607dc2c2bf45e749a961c6c397223af/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:53:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Lost my watch (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/lost_my_watch_scripting_news/#comment-27517</link><description>I remember when I first stopped wearing watches. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know the feeling you're talking about -- it goes away. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The funny thing is we are surrounded by so many reminders of what time it is that it's almost laughable that watches are still even necessary, except as jewelry.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Grieselhuber</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:12:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could S3 be an end-user product? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/could_s3_be_an_end_user_product_scripting_news/#comment-42760</link><description>Dave - &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Assuming there is no need to charge people more than Amazon does for data storage, why not eliminate the concern around security and just pass-through charge people what you're charged via S3. You get the same scalability and you don't require users to share their key. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just a thought.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Grieselhuber</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:09:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The debate about the worth of podcasting (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/the_debate_about_the_worth_of_podcasting_scripting_news/#comment-72999</link><description>I always like your perspective on these things. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Part of the problem is we're talking largely about media technologies, and media has almost always meant advertising. And media, traditionally, in the eyes of the publishers has always just been a channel they can monetize. That's why, with blogs (the technology), you have people who do nothing but blog. And some people make money at it - but the ones who do tend to have at least somewhat of an interesting life outside of their blog. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So the real question, in my mind, is how "new" media will continue to change and grow, especially in light of challenges like yours. Those of us who want to keep it real and blog for the purpose of sharing ideas and making friends will always have to find other ways to make a living. That's fine with me. It doesn't mean I think all blogs with ads on them aren't valid and useful sources of information, but their purpose is clearly different.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Grieselhuber</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:54:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Aggregation Dilemma</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/the_aggregation_dilemma_37/#comment-430291</link><description>This is a great post and it's one of the problems I'm trying to approach with Gridjit (&lt;a href="http://gridjit.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://gridjit.com&lt;/a&gt;). A new version is coming soon that supports FriendFeed but I agree with you that it (true aggregation) shouldn't stop there.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Part of it is data aggregation and part of it is finding a way to visualize the aggregated data. The question is how to make that aggregated data useful. What actions should you take? How can you use this aggregation to further promote your personal brand?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Grieselhuber</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 22:31:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gridjit, But Don't Boompaste</title><link>http://hyveup.disqus.com/gridjit_but_dont_boompaste/#comment-113116</link><description>Hey Xavier,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the mention on Gridjit and the amusing title. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We released Boompaste in October of last year just to get something out there and gain a better understanding of the sort of data we could collect. We've learned a lot and it's safe to say that Boompaste, long term, will look nothing like it does today. We leave it up there for now because we do have users and we've gotten reasonably positive feedback. That said, we definitely understand your perspective. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gridjit is a lot of fun. We're working on more stuff, so stay tuned!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ray</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Grieselhuber</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:38:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gridjit, But Don't Boompaste</title><link>http://hyveup.disqus.com/gridjit_but_dont_boompaste/#comment-115131</link><description>Sounds great - thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Grieselhuber</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:07:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gridjit: A Visual Twitter Portal Service</title><link>http://shegeeks.disqus.com/gridjit_a_visual_twitter_portal_service/#comment-330403</link><description>Hi Corvida,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the kind mention. I really strove to keep the UI as simple as possible, so I'm glad it went over well. I like the idea for timestamps. I'm also trying to figure out a nice way to visualize replies. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also like Twhirl a lot but sometimes I get overwhelmed by the "chattiness" of any IM type client. So, I alternate between using Twhirl and Gridjit, depending on my mood.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Grieselhuber</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 03:42:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gridjit</title><link>http://whitneyhess.disqus.com/gridjit/#comment-1948654</link><description>Hi Whitney - &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Congratulations - you're the first negative commenter. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The main reason I created it is because the majority of Twitter clients out there (including the web client) feel chaotic to me because of the vertical, list layout. I'm one of those people who prefer things laid out in grids, with items grouped consistently (eg. all recent messages grouped by author) instead of the chronological, "river" view that others prefer. That's it, really. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The feedback I've received so far has been positive -- I'm assuming it's because there are other like me. At any rate, I believe in releasing early and often. Upcoming versions will feature full Twitter client functionality for those who prefer the Gridjit environment. If you feel like taking another look at it then, I'd welcome any feedback. If not, thanks for taking the time so far. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ray</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Grieselhuber</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 02:32:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make FriendFeed &amp;#038; Twitter your social portal</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.disqus.com/make_friendfeed_038_twitter_your_social_portal/#comment-1579008</link><description>Thanks very much for the kind mention, Michael. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do have a lot planned for Gridjit and I'd love to hear if you have specific requests / features that you think would make Gridjit more enjoyable. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Currently in development are features to bring in your FriendFeed comments, likes, rooms and Twitter replies. I hope to have that out this week. This will hopefully round some things out for those two networks. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Grieselhuber</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:53:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make FriendFeed &amp;#038; Twitter your social portal &amp;laquo;  My Thoughts On Social Media</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.disqus.com/make_friendfeed_038_twitter_your_social_portal_laquo_my_thoughts_on_social_media/#comment-5545725</link><description>Thanks very much for the kind mention, Michael. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do have a lot planned for Gridjit and I'd love to hear if you have specific requests / features that you think would make Gridjit more enjoyable. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Currently in development are features to bring in your FriendFeed comments, likes, rooms and Twitter replies. I hope to have that out this week. This will hopefully round some things out for those two networks. :-)&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again!&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Grieselhuber</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:53:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://gary.tumblr.com/post/78884958</title><link>http://garyvaynerchuk.disqus.com/thread_62/#comment-6362552</link><description>Some of the best advice I've heard in a long time. Thanks so much for sharing it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Grieselhuber</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:27:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Radical Idea For News Sites: Show What&amp;#8217;s New On Your Homepage</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/radical_idea_for_news_sites_show_what8217s_new_on_your_homepage/#comment-13573652</link><description>The most subversive, and threatening, thing about news sites like Digg to organizations like NYTimes is that the editors - a small group of people with salaries paid for by any number of questionable interests - no longer get to decide what's important. We do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Digg, of course, has it's own problems but those are primarily problems with execution, not the model they have built. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great post. Interesting times ahead for the media biz.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray Grieselhuber</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:38:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>