<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Luke Janssen</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/c5fc3f3a50ecfe114ceeb69002a2f11d/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 12:35:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hedging Advertiser Risk on User Generated Content</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/hedging_advertiser_risk_on_user_generated_content/#comment-3459703</link><description>I can agree with Guy. We have a risk based moderation module as part of our Phoenix platform at TigerSpike. We build UGC sites for telcos and media groups, and I am afraid that depending on risk appetite, there is NO SUBSTITUTE for human moderation when talking about videos and images. Our innovation Lab looked into advanced technologies that look at skin tone etc etc.... but beware automated models, they don't understand context and are not effective for advertisers or brands in my opinion</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luke Janssen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:20:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Papa John&amp;#39;s Not Impressed With iPhone App As Marketing Tool</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/papa_john39s_not_impressed_with_iphone_app_as_marketing_tool/#comment-18905927</link><description>this happens so much with people - they can&amp;#39;t tell the difference between apps and iPhone optimised sites... not a huge deal, but as Jeff says, an app can provide a better experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the problem here is that Papa Johns dove in too quickly without thinking about what would really get results, and now that they haven&amp;#39;t got them, they have only themselves to blame... :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luke Janssen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 12:35:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>