http://disqus.com/people/c1268d130195d3b9d85ee0c009ff7b13/enThu, 25 Sep 2008 02:36:42 -0000http://playtheweb.disqus.com/rdfa_trials_and_travails/#comment-2621268Rob,<br><br>Fair criticism re vocabularies. In my experience it is about 80% reuse of existing vocabularies (or ontologies, if you need to impress you boss;) and only in few cases you need to invent terms on your own.<br><br>Please have a look at the following URIs and let me know in case you need more:<br><br> + <a href="http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Onotlogies" rel="nofollow">http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Onotlogies</a><br> + <a href="http://esw.w3.org/topic/VocabularyMarket" rel="nofollow">http://esw.w3.org/topic/VocabularyMarket</a><br> + <a href="http://www.schemaweb.info/" rel="nofollow">http://www.schemaweb.info/</a> (not actively maintained)<br><br>Btw, a good way to develop vocabularies and or exchange thoughts would be a VoCamp (<a href="http://vocamp.org/wiki/Main_Page" rel="nofollow">http://vocamp.org/wiki/Main_Page</a>).<br><br>Cheers,<br>MichaelMichael HausenblasThu, 25 Sep 2008 02:36:42 -0000