<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bwerdmuller</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/bwerdmuller/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/bwerdmuller/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:48:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Next Social Networks Will Not Be Powered By Blog Platforms</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2403/the-next-social-networks-will-not-be-powered-by-blog-platforms/#comment-1467729</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a lot to be said for using blogs as the centrepiece of a social network, but it's also arguable that this should be done from the outset rather than adding social features on as an afterthought. You're also right, I think, that the markets that would use a blog and would install a social network are different.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The time issue is important, and you're right: people aren't going to take the time to register for a hundred different social networks. They might be interested in more than they currently use if:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1. they can interact with them using their current profiles&lt;br&gt;2. finding networks with niche content they're interested in is as easy as finding groups on the single social networks they're used to&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We're edging closer to that idea of a single, decentralized social web - or, we should be. (The arguments Tim O'Reilly made recently about cloud computing and open source also apply to social networks.) We've made it a central focus of Elgg, and intend to do our part to change the landscape.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Werdmuller</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:48:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>