<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for brandverity</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-615cf8d7" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/brandverity/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:01:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TrishaLyn -   Online Marketing Glossary: Trademark Poaching</title><link>http://www.trishalyn.com/2008/08/online-marketing-glossary-trademark-poaching/#comment-1918480</link><description>I believe what you've described is more commonly known as 'direct linking'.  The term trademark poaching is typically used to describe the purchase of search ads on the trademarked terms. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It also usually refers to scenarios where this activity has been forbidden by merchants (the trademark holders)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brandverity</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:01:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s not just Trademark Poaching</title><link>http://72kilowatts.com/2008/05/22/its-not-just-trademark-poaching/#comment-511369</link><description>Yeah, the use of the term 'trademark' in 'trademark poaching' implies trademark abuse.  It just happens that trademarks are the most commonly restricted terms.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've even seen examples where merchants are angered by trademark bidding, but they haven't disallowed those actions in their bidding.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps the proper term is 'Restricted Keyword Poaching' or maybe just 'Keyword Poaching'.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brandverity</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:12:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>