<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bluelines</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/bluelines/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/bluelines/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:59:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Best Children&amp;#8217;s Books to Give Kids</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/the-best-childrens-books-to-give-kids/#comment-5140724</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree 100% on the Julia Donaldson books. My sister knows her and last summer got my daughter The Gruffalo, Chocolate Mousse for Greedy Goose and The Snail and the Whale, all signed and with a personal message.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:59:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers: Evolution or catastrophe?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/01/07/newspapers-evolution-or-catastrophe/#comment-4989799</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What strikes me about all of these discussions is that they are, understandably I suppose, so US-centric. UK newspapers, as I understand it, are far less precarious than their US counterparts, because they are and always have been relatively less dependent on advertising. The &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/table/2008/dec/05/abcs-pressandpublishing" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/table/2008/dec/05/abcs-pressandpublishing"&gt;most recent circulation figures&lt;/a&gt; I could find show a modest decline for most UK papers from late '07 to late '08 but nothing cataclysmic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm speculating here, but perhaps it's because, love them or hate them, the UK papers have always been a bit more blog-like in their approach. That is, they are opinionated, outspoken, take a moral and ideological stance, and are unafraid of upsetting, for example, the Prime Minister's handlers, in the same way that US papers generally act in a subservient way to the White House, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:47:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If you could write one book, what would it be about?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/if-you-could-write-one-book-what-would-it-be-about/#comment-4939703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm very overdue in starting work on a book about my Grandfather's life. So, that has to be at the top of my list.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:52:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Skype: Am I missing something?</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/skype_am_i_missing_something.html#comment-4914526</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's sort of like asking who uses calling cards -- it's a multi-billion dollar industry but when did you last meet anyone who uses calling cards? Skype does about $500 million in annual revenue, so obviously there are millions upon millions of active, paying users.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:31:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What would you like to be a master of?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/what-would-you-like-to-be-a-master-of/#comment-4520835</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely cooking. I'm already pretty good in the kitchen, but I don't have the "professional chef" skills that are required to be creative AND fast.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:41:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What would you like to change about the holiday season?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/what-would-you-like-to-change-about-the-holiday-season/#comment-4417336</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd like it if the festive spirit was, well, non-alcoholic. It's really upsetting that people see the holidays as an excuse to get drunk all day every day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:48:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Less You Get The More You Appreciate Christmas</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/the-less-you-get-the-more-you-appreciate-christmas/#comment-4411119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny, sort-of-related story: my wife was at the hair salon last week and two of the other customers were discussing in great detail exactly how many dozens and dozens of expensive gifts they'd bought for their very young children. My wife asked them if they'd noticed that there was a global economic meltdown happening. Their response? "Canada won't be affected, because we have the winter Olympics in 2010."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think my point is that rampant consumerism seems so totally inappropriate, this Christmas in particular. Buying dozens of gifts isn't just unhealthy for your children, it's also a sign that you are utterly insular and oblivious to the wider world.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:25:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s your favorite charity or philanthropic cause to support?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/whats-your-favorite-charity-or-philanthropic-cause-to-support/#comment-4330171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I mostly support environmental charities and causes. I have a monthly donation set up with the Sierra Club (not a charity), and have often given money to Greenpeace and the Union of Concerned Scientists. My family are big supporters of &lt;a href="http://www.wateraid.org/uk/&gt;Water Aid&lt;/a&gt;, whose focus is providing running water / sanitation in the poorest parts of the world. " rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.wateraid.org/uk/&gt;Water Aid&lt;/a&gt;, whose focus is providing running water / sanitation in the poorest parts of the world. "&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:35:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keep Your Eyes Off The Girl Next Door</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/keep-your-eyes-off-the-girl-next-door/#comment-4296322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's interesting, because while I abhor the various "torture" movies that have been foisted on us in the past few years, there are very different kinds of movie and TV violence. Even on the torture note, I'd certainly say that &lt;em&gt;Funny Games&lt;/em&gt; is very different from &lt;em&gt;Saw&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;Hostel&lt;/em&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Unforgiven&lt;/em&gt; is, as you say, a very powerful and well-made film, but it's also an important work about morality, and its violence is certainly not gratuitous. In fact it's a hugely valuable counterpoint to the mythology of the American West.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But it is amazing that American media in particular is so desensitized to violence and so over-sensitized to sex and depictions of sexuality. And even five years ago I remember seeing an episode of Entertainment Tonight in which one of the "controversies" they were breathlessly reporting on was an interracial kiss on primetime TV. Somehow a glorification of weapons and violence is less harmful to our children than honest depictions of real life??!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:56:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How do you want your neighborhood to feel?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/how-do-you-want-your-neighborhood-to-feel/#comment-4290673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd like my neighborhood to feel a little more authentic than it does. I live in Kitsilano, which is in many ways the nicest part of Vancouver, close to several beaches, full of tree-lined streets and older homes. However, it's also filling up with condos loudly proclaiming the too-cool-for-school urban lifestyle they embody, coffee shops that think the design of their paper cups is more important than the atmosphere and community they create, and organic food stores that are about fleecing the consumer rather than encouraging sustainable, local consumption.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:57:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is the quirkiest thing in your home that you will never give away?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/what-is-the-quirkiest-thing-in-your-home-that-you-will-never-give-away/#comment-4276805</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had a hard time thinking of an answer to this one, but then I remembered that our exercise equipment is actually pretty quirky, since we bought a shiny new rowing machine and spin bike, and they get more use as laundry racks than work-out machines...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:58:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top Five Get Out of Debt Mistakes</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/top-five-get-out-of-debt-mistakes/#comment-4241247</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very good point about the annual fees. Some cards have fees now in the $80+ range, which quickly adds up if you're talking about five or six cards.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 21:46:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are you going to do today, or this weekend, to create joy for someone else?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/what-are-you-going-to-do-today-or-this-weekend-to-create-joy-for-someone-else/#comment-4205270</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The great thing about having a 16-month-old daughter is that I can create joy for her simply by throwing grapes up in the air and catching them in my mouth. Or pushing her around in her little wooden cart.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:41:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five Best Pregnancy and Baby Books Actually Read by a Mother</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/five-best-pregnancy-and-baby-books-actually-read-by-a-mother/#comment-4196563</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love this list, mostly because the books are of the "stay sane, don't panic" variety. So many baby and parenting books are nothing more than a rigid and unworkable list of instructions, that make parents demoralized when their baby doesn't cooperate with the book. The best thing to remember is always that all babies are different and your instincts are almost always right...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:29:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who are your favorite female entrepreneurs?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/who-are-your-favorite-female-entrepreneurs/#comment-4154671</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://caterina.net&gt;Caterina Fake&lt;/a&gt; is definitely high up on the list. She founded Flickr, right here in Vancouver, and subsequently sold it to Yahoo! In turn she was at least partly responsible for igniting the web 2.0 frenzy that produced so many of the current generation of social / sharing websites.

The Flickr story is also a great testament to entrepreneurs who are willing to make big jumps away from their original plan. Ludicorp, the corporate entity behind Flickr, originally set out to create a MMORPG (massively multi-player online role-playing game, in case you're interested...) called Game Neverending, and Flickr was built as a component of this game. It subsequently turned into the actual business, and if you navigate around Flickr you will still see the " rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://caterina.net&gt;Caterina Fake&lt;/a&gt; is definitely high up on the list. She founded Flickr, right here in Vancouver, and subsequently sold it to Yahoo! In turn she was at least partly responsible for igniting the web 2.0 frenzy that produced so many of the current generation of social / sharing websites.

The Flickr story is also a great testament to entrepreneurs who are willing to make big jumps away from their original plan. Ludicorp, the corporate entity behind Flickr, originally set out to create a MMORPG (massively multi-player online role-playing game, in case you're interested...) called Game Neverending, and Flickr was built as a component of this game. It subsequently turned into the actual business, and if you navigate around Flickr you will still see the "&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:17:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Broken windows and a call for help</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/12/02/broken-windows-and-a-call-for-help/#comment-4148975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think a lot of it comes down to dealing with the question of anonymity. There are I suppose some circumstances in which people are anonymous for legitimate reasons (for example, if they're supporting an agenda that would cause them trouble at work or elsewhere), but mostly it's what leads to the worst comments and behaviour.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What about something along the lines of Amazon's "real name" verification, where comments from a user who has verified his or her name are automatically elevated above those that haven't?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:16:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Everything You Wanted to Know About Becoming a Vegetarian (But Were Afraid to Ask)</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/how-to-become-a-vegetarian/#comment-4137088</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To be fair to the author, the definition of "vegetarian" is taken quite loosely in lots of different contexts, and it's very common to encounter people who call themselves vegetarians but do eat fish.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to the farmed fish point -- there are very few truly sustainable forms of fish farming. It's a subject close to home here in Vancouver, where salmon farming has had a calamitous effect on the wild salmon population, mostly because of sea lice infestation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:05:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What holiday gifts are you excited about giving this year?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/what-holiday-gifts-are-you-excited-about-giving-this-year/#comment-4111572</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We're staying with my brother and his wife and seven-month-old for a night or two. I'd love to babysit and give them the chance for a proper night out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:09:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s your movie recommendation for this weekend?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/whats-your-movie-recommendation-for-this-weekend/#comment-4079923</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, it's not a movie, but Gavin and Stacey is a relatively obscure but totally brilliant British TV series that everyone should find time to watch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 01:31:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSFT and Yahoo: Nom nom nom</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/30/msft-and-yahoo-nom-nom-nom/#comment-4079900</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"If it had appeared in the Daily Mail or the Inquirer or something like that, then I would be dubious."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ouch!! The Daily Mail is a pretty horrible newspaper, but I don't think they're known for poorly-sourced tech. stories. Fear-mongering about immigrants, single mothers and gays is more their line.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 01:27:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who in your own life would you give the title of &amp;#8220;Hostess With the Mostess&amp;#8221;?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/who-in-your-own-life-would-you-give-the-title-of-hostess-with-the-mostess/#comment-4025165</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Without question my mother, who in turn was a passionate fan of Elizabeth David (the brilliant food writer who, more than anyone, brought an intelligent understanding of food to Britain, perfectly summed up by the title of one of the best collections of her writings, &lt;em&gt;South Wind Through the Kitchen&lt;/em&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:22:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What are you sensitive to?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/what-are-you-sensitive-to/#comment-3986046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Completely agree about the horror movie trailers. I used to be fairly oblivious to this stuff, but increasingly I find myself wondering what kind of people this stuff could possibly appeal to. And in turn what kind of people are making this stuff -- constantly escalating the gore and violence.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:46:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who or what is your favorite Icon?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/who-or-what-is-your-favorite-icon/#comment-3935422</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Steve McQueen, Clint Eastwood, early Woody Allen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:19:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is there life without Oatmeal and Caffeine?</title><link>http://carrieanddanielle.com/is-there-life-without-oatmeal-and-caffeine/#comment-3935303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, I had oatmeal and very strong espresso for breakfast this morning. I console myself with what I'm sure must be a myth -- that espresso has less caffeine than regular coffee...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:12:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comments: Messy and flawed, but valuable</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/20/comments-messy-and-flawed-but-valuable/#comment-3921848</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Markus Frind wrote &lt;a href="http://plentyoffish.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/listening-to-users-is-bad/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://plentyoffish.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/listening-to-users-is-bad/"&gt;something interesting&lt;/a&gt; on his blog yesterday, about the value of NOT asking your users for feedback and suggestions. Not directly related to your piece, but in the same realm of the whole role-of-community debate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I do think is needed is a bit more honesty and respect on both sides. Those who are calling for the death of old media need to acknowledge how valuable real journalism can be; and those who are terrified of old media's struggle with the new need to do a bit more embracing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:21:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>