<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for blogcosm</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/blogcosm/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:07:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Three Statistics That Lie</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/07/three-statistic.html#comment-834037</link><description>Its the feedburner daily reach stat for this blog's feed</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/07/three-statistic.html</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:07:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three Statistics That Lie</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/07/three-statistic.html#comment-827825</link><description>&lt;i&gt;But the number of people who read this blog via the feed every day averages less than 4,000.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you have any details behind that number?  I'm very interested in understanding where it comes from.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Scott</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blogcosm</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:20:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogs and the settling of the Wild West</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/19/blogs-and-the-settling-of-the-wild-west/#comment-244688</link><description>I don't share Mike's views about the politics completely, Blogcosm.  I think there is a lot of sturm und drang in the blogosphere, and that that drives pageviews in some cases, but I like to pretend that it's really about the quality of the content  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/19/blogs-and-the-settling-of-the-wild-west/</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:18:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogs and the settling of the Wild West</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/19/blogs-and-the-settling-of-the-wild-west/#comment-244397</link><description>No links allowed in a comment?  Here's the part that disappeared: "Michael Arrington is a blind man; the blogosphere is an elephant".  (Which implies that I may be just as blind.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blogcosm</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:57:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogs and the settling of the Wild West</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/19/blogs-and-the-settling-of-the-wild-west/#comment-244387</link><description>Do you actually share his views on the politics of blogging?  I don't.  I'm more inclined to believe that &lt;a href="http://blog.blogcosm.com/2008/03/19/michael-arrington-blind-man-blogosphere-elephant/&gt;Michael Arrington is a blind man; the blogosphere is an elephant&lt;/a&gt;.  (Which implies that I may be just as blind.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blogcosm</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:55:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Startup Advice Weekend</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/03/startup-advice.html#comment-214123</link><description>&lt;i&gt;"Dave Winer, 0 successful startups"&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not true.  ("Kids these days; just don't know their history.")  Here's some background: &lt;a href="http://productarchitect.com/more1987.html"&gt;http://productarchitect.com/more1987.html&lt;/a&gt; ... AFAIK he made real money selling to Symantec.  He also sold &lt;a href="http://Weblogs.com"&gt;Weblogs.com&lt;/a&gt; for a reported $2.3M.  In between: Frontier was influential in many ways, not to mention all the other things he's had a hand in.  Actually, Frontier is an interesting case study: a great product that didn't turn into a great company....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blogcosm</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 05:13:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Is A Great Way To Make Money</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/02/free-is-a-great.html#comment-178456</link><description>I managed to trackback to your old post but not this one, so here goes a &lt;a href="http://blog.blogcosm.com/2008/02/25/chris-andersons-free-lunch/"&gt;manual one&lt;/a&gt;.  In addition to spreading the word about proper credit for Freemium, I mention an earlier Josh Kopelman post that deserves attention, plus suggest a book: Robert Rodin's "Free, Perfect, and Now".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blogcosm</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:13:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lane Hartwell: Still wrong on fair use</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/17/lane-hartwell-still-wrong-on-fair-use/#comment-39487</link><description>I haven't dismissed anyone.  I've made my argument, plain and simple&lt;br&gt;-- and I've allowed others to do the same.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/17/lane-hartwell-still-wrong-on-fair-use/</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:54:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lane Hartwell: Still wrong on fair use</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/17/lane-hartwell-still-wrong-on-fair-use/#comment-39404</link><description>&lt;i&gt;"the fact remains that by any reasonable interpretation of "fair use,"&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not sure which word you don't understand: "fact", "reasonable" or "interpretation".  The only FACT is that you, Arrington and LawGeek have weighed in on one side of a complicated legal question, and that other people have weighed in on the other side.  (e.g. one of LawGeek's anon commenters raised some very serious objections to the cited cases.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You may sincerely believe that your critics are "unreasonable" -- but that's all too often just an excuse for dismissing them, as you've done here.  Guess what?  Many thoughtful people who have real experience with copyright have come down on the other side of the "fair use" question.  Or, at the very least, acknowledge that this case is well into the gray area.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blogcosm</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:54:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interesting Debate About Times Select</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2007/10/interesting-deb.html#comment-5797</link><description>Of course that's possible, but I suspect that the WSJ is an exception since it's considered a "business news" paper rather than "general news" paper.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blogcosm</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:32:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should VCs Blog?</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2007/09/should-vcs-blog.html#comment-3437</link><description>Whether or not VC's "should" blog, I guarantee that your and other VC blogs are great resources for entrepreneurs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Also, since I didn't see a trackback option I hope a manual "trackback" to &lt;a href="http://blog.blogcosm.com/2007/09/25/venture-capital-blog-or-not-blog-question/"&gt;my post&lt;/a&gt; is ok.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blogcosm</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:12:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Al Warms Sells Buzztracker to Yahoo!, Becomes GM Of News</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2007/09/al-warms-sells-.html#comment-2682</link><description>Long-time readers may remember that "Al from Chicago" (Alan Warms) posted a &lt;a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2006/08/vc_clich_of_the_1.html#comments"&gt;comment&lt;/a&gt; here on A VC with a very useful analysis of The Huffington Post raising $5M.  That (plus some data I grabbed from Jeremy Liew and Tim O'Reilly) may help explain &lt;a href="http://blog.blogcosm.com/2007/09/15/why-buzztracker-sold-5-million-instead-raising-5/"&gt;Why BuzzTracker sold for $5 million instead of raising $5 million&lt;/a&gt;.  I think it's useful info for Web entrepreneurs.  (No credit goes to me; I'm just the messenger.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blogcosm</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:00:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>