<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for biznickman</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/biznickman/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/biznickman/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:36:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 10 years — PaulStamatiou.com</title><link>http://paulstamatiou.com/10-years-blogging/#comment-2171314300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome job Paul. I remember the good 'ole days when comments were a place to connect :) That definitely has shifted. Your shift to longer form content seems to be in line with where one-person blogs are going. I'm often in awe of your ability to churn out such long stuff!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:36:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Do You Get a Man Who Can Afford Anything In His Life?</title><link>https://www.danmartell.com/love/#comment-2168445468</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome video!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:18:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: [Live Case Study] 14-Day Facebook Ad Experiment</title><link>https://videofruit.com/blog/facebook-ad-experiment/#comment-2164702174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a fair point. Also if he knows his value per email (which he does), then as long as he's paying less than that, he's good to go.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 03:27:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: [Live Case Study] 14-Day Facebook Ad Experiment</title><link>https://videofruit.com/blog/facebook-ad-experiment/#comment-2163680275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You have one massive opportunity missed here: the tripwire. You are paying for ads to ultimate drive people to a landing page. However on the next page you just say "check your inbox and share with your friends". If you offer a one-time offer ("liquidation offer" or "tripwire") you can offset a large percentage of your ad spend immediately.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:24:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3 Ways To Build An Audience BEFORE Launching Your Startup</title><link>https://www.danmartell.com/buildbeforeyoulaunch/#comment-2068626757</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Dan,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great post! Saw this in my feed and reminded me of something I wrote back in 2012 about the concept of a "minimum viable community" (&lt;a href="http://nickoneill.com/minimum-viable-community/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://nickoneill.com/minimum-viable-community/)"&gt;http://nickoneill.com/minim...&lt;/a&gt;. I'm all for building a community first as you build out your product. It also serves as a great platform to test out your ideas.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 15:33:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Swipe to Reveal Cells - NSScreencast</title><link>https://nsscreencast.com/episodes/107-swipe-to-reveal-cells#comment-1269505935</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll have to look to find where in the video you mentioned it. However I found one other problem with this approach. Adding the UIScrollView winds up killing the call to didSelectRowAtIndexPath which is kind of a critical delegate method. Is there any way to work around this?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:03:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Swipe to Reveal Cells - NSScreencast</title><link>https://nsscreencast.com/episodes/107-swipe-to-reveal-cells#comment-1253447782</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A quick update. It appears that this does not function with autolayout. The video inaccurately calls "Autosizing" "Autolayout", which it is most definitely not. In your storyboard in the example you have autolayout disabled.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:58:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Swipe to Reveal Cells - NSScreencast</title><link>https://nsscreencast.com/episodes/107-swipe-to-reveal-cells#comment-1252406153</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I tried this exact code and the scrollview won't scroll :( I double check by logging out the width of the contentsize of the scrollview and it says it's larger than the frame itself yet for some reason it still won't scroll.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scrollview frame size is 320, content size is 400.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;userInteractionEnabled = YES;&lt;br&gt;scrollEnabled = YES;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yet for some reason it won't scroll.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:26:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Beat the GMAT: Why You Don&amp;#8217;t Have To Be An Expert &amp;#8211; with Eric Bahn</title><link>https://mixergy.com/interviews/eric-bahn-beat-the-gmat-interview/#comment-1082478911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;QSBS is why I incorporated as a C-Corp! However I'm not sure that you still get the same benefits today. I remember the sponsor of this site, Scott Walker, had suggested I take advantage of it. There is a downside to C-Corps though: you get double taxed. Early on this can really hit your cash flows. There are obviously ways of managing money but smaller businesses are great as LLCs especially if there's no intent to sell it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:54:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Early Wins That Got Our SaaS Startup 1,000 Beta Users</title><link>https://blog.groovehq.com/early-wins#comment-1068726377</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When people signed up were they exchanging any money? If so, I didn't see that on here. If no, why not? Isn't money the ultimate validation, not emails?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 10:45:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A SaaS Startup’s Journey to $100,000 a Month</title><link>https://blog.groovehq.com/100k#comment-1064480929</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome! Thanks for sharing Alex. The transparency on revenue is great. What I'd love to know is how you came up with the specific idea you're working on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:54:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some thoughts on mobile</title><link>http://cdixon.org/2013/06/01/some-thoughts-on-mobile/#comment-917112401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@naveen Not completely true.  I've seen a number of products begin providing "add-on" features that have additional costs.  One product that has done this in a relatively in your face way is Gorilla Workout.  They started adding features that cost $0.99 (after an original price of $1.99 for the download).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Charging to unlock new features is the way to go and I think it's something people in the productivity/business space would be more receptive to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 21:12:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Pickup Artists Are Great Business People</title><link>https://mixergy.com/pickup-artists-business/#comment-715197138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True, not all pickup artists are good at business :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:40:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Pickup Artists Are Great Business People</title><link>https://mixergy.com/pickup-artists-business/#comment-715196262</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why would you put the author in the title?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:38:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Pickup Artists Are Great Business People</title><link>https://mixergy.com/pickup-artists-business/#comment-710196455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Janis,  the point isn't to watch 196 GB of pickup tutorials.  The point is to get out there and practice and master whatever it is that you're doing!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:40:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Make An Elegant Two Color Top Border With CSS</title><link>https://www.natashatherobot.com/two-color-top-border-with-css/#comment-704440586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome job!!  This is a clever way of doing it.  I'm wondering if there are any other ways that don't require the additional HTML&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:40:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Being Broke Is A Founder’s Greatest Asset</title><link>https://mixergy.com/broke-founders/#comment-693543311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Erica,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for inspiring the post ;)  As for broke-ness having negative aspects, I agree.  I think the title wound up containing some hyperbole, however the point is you need to be scrappy to start getting the revenue in the door.  As you say, you *had* to make it work ... that's a great way to get you performing!  Thanks again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Nick&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:32:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Being Broke Is A Founder’s Greatest Asset</title><link>https://mixergy.com/broke-founders/#comment-691445112</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think doing it yourself is always the best way.  I've made this mistake as well.  However coming up with scrappy ways of getting the project done is always valuable (even if that includes doing a lot of things yourself).  I think there are ways to get others to help you out as well without a huge budget.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:29:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Being Broke Is A Founder’s Greatest Asset</title><link>https://mixergy.com/broke-founders/#comment-691441198</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone on HackerNews made me realize there should be a distinction between "broke" and "almost broke".  I've been in both circumstances.  "Broke" was me firing a friend because I literally had no more money.  "Almost broke" was an incentive to come up with a business model quickly.  For the purpose of this article I was referring to those who are "almost broke".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:25:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Being Broke Is A Founder’s Greatest Asset</title><link>https://mixergy.com/broke-founders/#comment-691042056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing Jeff!  I went through the same process about 13 years ago.  I had a friend who was going to build a website for me using PHP.  He didn't finish the job so I spent countless hours learning to code.  Just like you it took me a week for what would otherwise be a 15 minute task ... but now I can code.  A lot of the people I now know who hire developers for their products wish they had learned to code.   Great job!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:26:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Being Broke Is A Founder’s Greatest Asset</title><link>https://mixergy.com/broke-founders/#comment-690553706</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"This time around, I have money so I'm going to do it RIGHT!!"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think you've nailed it.  And yes, I've had a similar experience :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:53:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Being Broke Is A Founder’s Greatest Asset</title><link>https://mixergy.com/broke-founders/#comment-690553224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the note Mike.  I think you organically grow and then if you'd like to inject capital you can use that to expand.  But using excess capital to get the company out the door doesn't seem to work very well from what I've seen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:52:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: @SecondMarket offering investment in companies on @AngelList; min amt is $5k | Launch Ticker</title><link>http://launchticker.com/story/secondmarket-offering-investment-in-companies-on-angellist#comment-685309120</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is this not posted anywhere else?!?!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:54:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The only 2 ways to build a $100 million business</title><link>http://versiononeventures.com/the-only-2-ways-to-build-a-100-million-business/#comment-656218121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I have to disagree here.  Half the Facebook app developers that acquired millions of users had no way to monetize them and sold them off but the acquirers did nothing with them.  They were a write off. So assuming that having millions of people is all it takes is false.  The requirement with millions of users is *maintaining millions of people*.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also agree with Rand Fishkin here ... I'm a big advocate of inbound marketing models.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:09:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Acqui-hire is just another way to spell failure - Jacques Mattheij</title><link>http://jacquesmattheij.com/acqui-hire-is-just-another-way-to-spell-failure#comment-630924565</link><description>&lt;p&gt;*unfunded&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick O'Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:58:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>