<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for biznickman</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-9175e885" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/biznickman/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:58:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What Exactly are Social Games?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/07/social-games/#comment-20625678</link><description>Spak</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:58:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 10 Commandments of the Social Web</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/07/social-web/#comment-19298114</link><description>Spak</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:02:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 4 Surefire Tactics To Get Your Site Overloaded With Traffic</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/10/surefire-traffic-tactics/#comment-18299227</link><description>Erich,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exactly.  I've played the traffic game and it is not only addictive but exhilarating when you beat your records.  The only problem is when you try to start making money off of that ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please let me know how the new strategy pays off!  I truly believe in the longer route toward building a valuable following.  It's hard work but it's bound to pay off.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Nick</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:55:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 4 Surefire Tactics To Get Your Site Overloaded With Traffic</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/10/surefire-traffic-tactics/#comment-18298592</link><description>Hi Jason,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are definitely right.  There are a number of strategies which combine lots of content and are actually informative.  Scaling that business model is very difficult however.  If you are looking to build a media business then it's great strategy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Nick</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:44:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Are You Retweeting Compliments Of Yourself?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/09/why-are-you-retweeting-compliments-of-yourself/#comment-17887969</link><description>Wow ... we have fights breaking out in the comments ... this is awesome!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:26:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Are You Retweeting Compliments Of Yourself?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/09/why-are-you-retweeting-compliments-of-yourself/#comment-17886643</link><description>Ari, couldn't you just thank the people rather than retweet the fact that they said it?  I feel like there's a big difference between both models.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:11:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Are You Retweeting Compliments Of Yourself?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/09/why-are-you-retweeting-compliments-of-yourself/#comment-17884081</link><description>Scoble,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm always up for poking sticks in eyes of citics.  But as with you ... I try to avoid it especially because sarcastic tweets don't come across to well (other people don't understand that I'm really trying to bug a few people).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:23:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Capitalist&amp;#8217;s Manifesto</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/09/the-social-capitalists-manifesto/#comment-17817196</link><description>So don't think of social as "socialist" ... it's social in the sense of socializing with others.  Socializers and capitalists fit well with one another :)  Combine the two and you have a social capitalist!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:47:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This New Trend in Facebook Apps Looks Ugly</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2009/09/21/this-new-trend-in-facebook-apps-looks-ugly/#comment-17052579</link><description>Totally agree Jesse ... these aren't really applications, just press releases.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:34:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Become An Overnight Expert In 3 Years</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/09/how-to-become-an-expert/#comment-16576767</link><description>@Adam,  I think the title was more of a figure of speech but 3 years makes sense.  Didn't Gladwell state 10 years was how long it takes to become a master at something though?  I don't remember the number in that book but I recall it being a fairly long time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:35:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shifting From Social Media Fascination To Generating True Value</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/09/shifting-from-social-media-fascination-to-generating-true-value/#comment-16391898</link><description>Thanks Mari for the kind words.  I think you definitely have a great perspective on things and you've been focusing on relationship marketing for much longer than I have.  Thanks again!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:43:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could The Feed Economy Self-Destruct?</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/09/could-the-feed-economy-self-destruct/#comment-15903157</link><description>Hey Ari,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a very good question.  I previously thought that developers would build these filters but so far I've only seen beginning attempts.  I guess a great way to look at it is that there are amazing opportunities ahead for developers to quickly improve upon the current discovery models.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Nick</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:55:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why You Need To Shut Up And Start Listening</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/08/why-you-need-to-shut-up-and-start-listening/#comment-15401997</link><description>@John, I'm not sure what you mean by your question ... Obviously you should still produce content, but a larger part of online communication is listening to what's going on, not just speaking.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:27:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How A Single Email Killed A PR Firm</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/08/how-a-single-email-killed-a-pr-firm/#comment-15150155</link><description>Steve,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here job is to reach out to us and so far all of her press releases haven't come off to well.  I tend to be a polite individual and rarely discuss when someone slips up but this turned into a disaster and all she need to do was to delete the list from running at all and start a new one.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It took 8 hours to figure it out.  She still hasn't sent a follow-up email to anybody to explain what happened and engage them directly.  She also apologizes in the comments here yet doesn't understand what technically went wrong when sending emails is practically her job.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I honestly don't want to be rude but she just made one mistake after another and IT'S HER JOB to know these things. I've seen mistakes like this made before but typically it was squashed in no time at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Nick</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:40:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I guess I’m online a lot
 via MIT Personas by... - the michael galpert tumblelog</title><link>http://msg.tumblr.com/post/166229257#comment-15044885</link><description>That's a pretty awesome tool ... too bad for me there are other nick o'neills that are polluting my persona :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:13:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interview: TimeXchange Opens its Mobile Platform to Become More Social</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/01/timexchange-open-mobile-platfor/#comment-10624347</link><description>Span</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:48:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Increase Your Email Whuffie Factor In 5 Easy Steps</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/05/calculate-email-whuffie/#comment-9772970</link><description>Whoops!  Ill fix that</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:07:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Increase Your Email Whuffie Factor In 5 Easy Steps</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/05/calculate-email-whuffie/#comment-9771833</link><description>Whoops!  Ill fix that</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:33:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Increase Your Email Whuffie Factor In 5 Easy Steps</title><link>http://www.socialtimes.com/2009/05/calculate-email-whuffie/#comment-9771587</link><description>Whoops!  Ill fix that</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:27:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/facebook-adds-more-filters-to-home-feed.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/facebook-adds-more-filters-to-home-feed.html#comment-7557487</link><description>Hey Jesse,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One thing you may want to clarify about the following statement: "For instance, if you just want to hide a person's Delicious bookmarks or Google Reader shares" is that if you block an application it blocks it for all friends, not just that user.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:32:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gary Vaynerchuk - All my decisions are/were  Wrong 
So many people...</title><link>http://garyvaynerchuk.com/post/90159262#comment-7543881</link><description>You speak the truth Gary.  There are always ways to make things bigger and better but eventually you need to just get things done.  While I wouldn't be satisfied with underachieving ... making mistakes is just part of the game!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:13:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter to offer Facebook Page-like features for companies (or what)?</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/03/25/twitter-to-offer-facebook-page-like-features-for-companies-or-what/#comment-7506111</link><description>I like parlor games :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:41:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: asdf</title><link>http://www.siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=3445#comment-7477334</link><description>My answer is Yes, you are wrong but I still enjoy this site :)  In regards to ExecTweets ... I'm not quite sure what they're trying to accomplish exactly.  The biggest problem is they're highlighting many people that are already popular on Twitter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:13:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: asdf</title><link>http://www.siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=3445#comment-7476528</link><description>Hey Mark,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the link.  Obviously I'd disagree with you that Facebook doesn't register and people don't know what's going on.  Facebook has become the number one driver of traffic to Perez Hilton over the past year.  While I and your other readers on Twitter and Friendfeed are likely to come to your site from sources outside of Facebook, Facebook is much more mainstream and drives much more traffic to larger sites.  I'm not sure that this site is the best example of a site that would benefit greatly from Facebook.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not that it doesn't have interesting content, but I would argue that it's much more niche.  You are entitled to your opinion of Facebook though and I'm sure there are at least a few other people that would agree :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Nick</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:39:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Episode 31: "On the Road at TransparencyCamp"</title><link>http://www.thesocialweb.tv/blog/2009/03/transparency-camp.html#comment-6999378</link><description>Great to see you there Dave ... we missed Chris @ dinner!  See you at SXSW!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:22:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>