<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bhc3</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/bhc3/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:11:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Spigit looks for $4M more for co. social networks</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/spigit_looks_for_4m_more_for_co_social_networks/#comment-14716023</link><description>Hey Mark -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for taking an interest in our business. We will have to add you to our quarterly financial meetings! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As the article notes, Spigit is running in the black, thanks to closing a number of deals with Fortune 2000 enterprises. Spigit's SaaS innovation management platform integrates emergent social collaboration with traditional workflow and analytics in innovation communities. It's that combination of Enterprise 2.0 with traditional aspects of enterprise software and internal processes that's resonating with leading companies. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hutch Carpenter&lt;br&gt;Director of Marketing&lt;br&gt;Spigit</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:11:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Teen Girl Falls into Sewer while Texting</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/teen_girl_falls_into_sewer_while_texting/#comment-12520973</link><description>"Her mother plans on suing the city" - Oh c'mon! Walking around with your nose buried in your cell phone doesn't mean everyone else assumes liability.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:54:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quitting FriendFeed</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/quitting_friendfeed/#comment-11867140</link><description>Thanks. Definitely following on Twitter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:56:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quitting FriendFeed</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/quitting_friendfeed/#comment-11861571</link><description>Bummer Jason - I've liked our interactions on FriendFeed. Is your account now completely pulled? Well, I'll catch you on Twitter (* goes to see if we're following each other *) and your blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:03:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTF Friendfeed &amp;ndash; you may have just crossed the line</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/wtf_friendfeed_ndash_you_may_have_just_crossed_the_line/#comment-11386004</link><description>Clicked it from FriendFeed, and read it Steven!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:08:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That&amp;#039;s not what I ordered...</title><link>http://boomscriggity.disqus.com/that039s_not_what_i_ordered/#comment-10449469</link><description>Im not sure if licking cancer is a good idea Hutch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;3 thanks for the support!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-10221</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:05:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That&amp;#039;s not what I ordered...</title><link>http://boomscriggity.disqus.com/that039s_not_what_i_ordered/#comment-10434104</link><description>Drew - amazing post, and your philosophy is admirable. I'm rooting for you. You're gonna lick this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:00:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three reasons you need to stay far away from FriendFeed - a contrarian view</title><link>http://empoprise-bi.disqus.com/three_reasons_you_need_to_stay_far_away_from_friendfeed_a_contrarian_view/#comment-10023424</link><description>Louis' reach includes everything. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">empoprises</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:05:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three reasons you need to stay far away from FriendFeed - a contrarian view</title><link>http://empoprise-bi.disqus.com/three_reasons_you_need_to_stay_far_away_from_friendfeed_a_contrarian_view/#comment-9974620</link><description>Well, at least you are a FriendFeed fanboy! Good to consider the good with the bad. Fortunately, none of my 3 reasons relate to your reasons above. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And glad to see Louis's reach includes Facebook.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:22:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Talking HEADs</title><link>http://bitlyblog.disqus.com/talking_heads/#comment-9730938</link><description>Hi Bit.ly guys -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm seeing really odd traffic stats for some bit.ly URLs. The click counts are way too high. Are there other things that would cause that beyond the HEAD requests? This issue is happening this week, well after the removal of HEAD requests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's a discussion about this on FriendFeed: &lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com/bhc3/619f00e6/something-is-very-wrong-with-bit-ly-click-counts" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://friendfeed.com/bhc3/619f00e6/something-i...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 11:29:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Link Page</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/twitter_link_page/#comment-9241137</link><description>Thanks to Nigel and Hutch for mentioning MicroPlaza!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If anyone is interested in receiving an invite code, just follow @Microplaza on Twitter!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Xavier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:58:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Link Page</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/twitter_link_page/#comment-9240223</link><description>I'll second Microplaza. It may be exactly what you're looking for Fred. It only lists links from people you follow, but for those links, you see the total number of times they were tweeted. You can create sub-groups from your Twitter list as well ("tribes"). That way you peruse tweeted links that are likely more targeted around specific subjects.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:09:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/good-people-bad-companies-intersection.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_5518/#comment-9182687</link><description>Spot-on Louis. We in Silicon Valley underplay the luck aspect of what we do. It's easy to get dazzled by a company name on a resume. But there really is a confluence of timing and serendipity that drives the success of many workers. Were you at Jaiku or Twitter? Were you at Commerce One in 1999 or 2001? Not to say there isn't skill and great thinking in the success of these companies. But the pendulum swings too far toward crediting anyone ever associated with these companies with glory.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 12:01:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweeting behind the firewall (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/tweeting_behind_the_firewall_scripting_news/#comment-9150273</link><description>Yup Dave - it is all coming around again - nice to see. Narrating your work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 01:43:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Walking out of the Classroom</title><link>http://andrewmcafee.disqus.com/on_walking_out_of_the_classroom/#comment-8660143</link><description>Congratulations Andrew - sounds like a great fit. Looking forward to your insights from MIT via the blog and Twitter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:26:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A review of idea and innovation software</title><link>http://mercury-rac.disqus.com/a_review_of_idea_and_innovation_software/#comment-8350914</link><description>Thanks, Hutch.  I appreciate the additional info.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jedc_mercury</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:22:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A review of idea and innovation software</title><link>http://mercury-rac.disqus.com/a_review_of_idea_and_innovation_software/#comment-8304592</link><description>Hi Jed -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for including Spigit in your write-up. You're right - we are seeing great uptake by enterprise customers. Managing the multiple sources of ideas, and filtering for those that are most useful, is an *idea* that is taking root in the corporate world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You raise some good questions about us, and I'll answer them here. First, in terms of complexity vs simplicity. The platform is actually quite easy for employees, customers and partners to use. It leverages some of the best practices one finds for social software: votes, tags, discussion forums, clickable reviews, wikis, blogs. We also provide a market for users to buy and sell ideas. Any or all of these are available for use when deployed, internally or externally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We put a premium on a superior user experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The analytics engine and enterprise workflow of the platform is why companies are signing up for Spigit. Simple popularity contests for ideas do give a single metric - number of votes. Certainly that is a form of simplicity. But it's doesn't come close to mapping to the way innovation really works inside corporations. Spigit has designed-in functionality that reflects the different influence users have in advancing an idea forward.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Spigit's platform has enterprise workflow built-in. Role-based reviews and approvals, quantifiable criteria to advance through stages, and high configurability to adapt to each company's specific processes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Happy to tell you more about what Spigit is up to. Please drop us a note at &lt;a href="mailto:info@spigit.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;info@spigit.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hutch Carpenter&lt;br&gt;Director of Marketing&lt;br&gt;Spigit, Inc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://spigit.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://spigit.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:52:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On (to) TechCrunch</title><link>http://parislemon.disqus.com/on_to_techcrunch/#comment-8091318</link><description>Thanks a lot Hutch, glad you'll be reading.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 01:19:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On (to) TechCrunch</title><link>http://parislemon.disqus.com/on_to_techcrunch/#comment-8090710</link><description>You go MG!  Looking forward to reading your news, analysis and wit over at TechCrunch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:20:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Doing what social media gurus would say you&amp;rsquo;re crazy to do</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/doing_what_social_media_gurus_would_say_yoursquore_crazy_to_do/#comment-7847453</link><description>Cool - looking forward to seeing what's cooking Steven. Hope you'll save a little crank for what's next.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:34:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook wants you to give credit where credit is due</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/facebook_wants_you_to_give_credit_where_credit_is_due/#comment-7813593</link><description>+1 bdude</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:11:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter a news system? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/is_twitter_a_news_system_scripting_news/#comment-7496892</link><description>When the US Air plane came down in the Hudson, the New York Times heard about it from two separate places: (1) the regular beat reporter for the police HQ; (2) Twitter. &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/15/opinion/15pubed.html?_r=4" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/15/opinion/15pub...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:52:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 million page views</title><link>http://duncanriley.disqus.com/10_million_page_views/#comment-7487215</link><description>Congrats Duncan. I've been enjoying you, Steven and the gang on The Inquisitr. I'm always digging your tech, and find myself sneaking peeks at your celeb news too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:13:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Having a problem with all this Social Media crap</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/having_a_problem_with_all_this_social_media_crap/#comment-7405686</link><description>But hutch look for a minute at who is promoting things like retweeting like it's the next page rank for social media. The majority aren't the one's who earn an income from advertising but rather from those who already have the name power and their faithful minions. The chances of either you or I having the depth of reach of the retweeting pump and dump is next to nil compared to an O'Reilly, Scoble, or Arrington/Techcrunch retweeting run.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our interactions with readers on the other hand is something we build up over time and as the conversation becomes more and more splintered it becomes harder for us to ride any momentum forward.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your second part though shows what I have been trying to say about our own niche communities being held together by Social Media glue or communication pathways. Regardless of what the tools are or what the marketers are pushing your community of e2.0 would survive quite nicely without the social media hype and retweeting silliness. It would survive because you have the larger Social Media ethos that fluidly binds you together for as long as you need it to. Your Social Media involvement through your e2.0 niche doesn't have to deal with the irritations of the social media white noise and therefor is far more beneficial to those in those niche communities.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:24:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Having a problem with all this Social Media crap</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/having_a_problem_with_all_this_social_media_crap/#comment-7404250</link><description>I know where you're coming from on this Steven. I get the "to what end" aspect of social media. I'm of the belief that each of us makes it useful in our own ways. Would I love to have 50 Likes and comments for everything I post on FriendFeed? A bazillion retweets on Twitter? Sure! Why not? But what I've seen is that maintaining a high level of interaction is required for that, or having existing renown outside of the services. For most of us, that's just not happening. But then you have to ask yourself...how important is that, really? At least for white-collar professionals who aren't gunning for advertising revenue on their sites, these popularity metrics aren't so critical.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What *has* worked for me is leveraging social media to improve my knowledge and connections for a specific field. Professionally, I'm part of the enterprise 2.0 sector. I'm making a lot of connections there, and I've been pleasantly surprised how well tracking social media for e2.0 has helped me. The opinions, information and connections among different people have made me a lot smarter for my job. I've met some great people online in this way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To paraphrase the Stones, you can't always get what you want, but sometimes you get what you need.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:27:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>