<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for James</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/bf4cf442033b117285594452e785ae16/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:58:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter federates with Google? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/twitter_federates_with_google_scripting_news/#comment-4417498</link><description>Not sure how Twitter gains here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, Google wins big.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:58:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: New Facebook Design Omits Major Features, Including Pokes</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_new_facebook_design_omits_major_features_including_pokes/#comment-1050554</link><description>Did you do *any* research or look at the new design for longer than 30 seconds?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pages and groups are on the Info tab.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pokes are under the profile picture.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ignore All is right there when you go to view your requests.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:05:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: New Facebook Design Omits Major Features, Including Pokes</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_new_facebook_design_omits_major_features_including_pokes/#comment-1050738</link><description>I've checked the Info tab on 3 or 4 of my friends and it lists their pages and groups underneath their details.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is Scobles for instance:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.new.facebook.com/profile.php?id=501319654&amp;ref=ts#v=info" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.new.facebook.com/profile.php?id=5013...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:21:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Firefox for the Apple iPhone</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/no_firefox_for_the_apple_iphone_84/#comment-1204143</link><description>Think you are adding 2+2 and getting 4.5 here.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The issue is that iPhone is Cocoa/Objc for apps and Webkit for rendering pages.  You can't put .net, Java or XUL on there. And to be honest I think thats fair. Why should Firefox get a pass that other developers don't? Its not a case of Apple saying Mozilla can't put their apps on there, but rather they have the same limitations as any other iPhone developer. Apple dont want non-native code, non-native widgets using non-native frameworks.  Its as simple as that really. Something like Camino would easily be able to get onto the AppStore IMO</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:09:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>