<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bexmex</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/bexmex/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/bexmex/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:29:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Help Bex Choose a Topic for His Collaborate 2013 Deep Dive</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2012/12/13/help-bex-choose-a-topic-for-his-collaborate-2013-deep-dive/#comment-736429758</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Jake! I hope this turns out well... if I don't get much consensus from the WebCenter community, I'm probably just gonna do performance tuning...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:29:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashup Standards: JSON-P vs. CORS</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2012/07/25/mashup-standards-json-p-vs-cors/#comment-653219876</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cross domain iframe are a whole 'nother security issue entirely... and just like life before CORS, mostly a collection of workarounds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's no cross-domain iFrame standard that I cam across in my research, so I omitted it as a possibility.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:13:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: City Pension Fund $1.1 Billion in Debt</title><link>http://publicola.com/2012/08/01/city-pension-fund-1-1-billion-in-debt/#comment-607880816</link><description>&lt;p&gt; A "defined benefit" pension is essentially no different than a fixed-benefit annuity, which is sold by pretty much every bank, broker, and insurance company in the world. They are far from obsolete. They're just a bit more expensive than they used to be.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:28:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: City Pension Fund $1.1 Billion in Debt</title><link>http://publicola.com/2012/08/01/city-pension-fund-1-1-billion-in-debt/#comment-607878269</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Three things...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) as the head of the biggest bond fund in the world (PIMCO), Bill Gross has a strong financial incentive to make people think bonds are better than stocks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2) there's a big math logic in his analysis about how stocks consistently yielded 3% above GDP growth. Yglasias covers it better than I:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/07/31/bill_gross_says_stocks_are_doomed_here_s_why_he_s_wrong.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/07/31/bill_gross_says_stocks_are_doomed_here_s_why_he_s_wrong.html"&gt;http://www.slate.com/blogs/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3) it's still possible to get 8% return, provided you are investing in countries with fast growing GDP... there are several overlooked in Africa which seem to be the future. It won't last forever, but we don't need it to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:26:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: City Pension Fund $1.1 Billion in Debt</title><link>http://publicola.com/2012/08/01/city-pension-fund-1-1-billion-in-debt/#comment-607870271</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If they are getting 0% return this year, then all is not lost. It's possible that they invested in assets while they were cheap, and then they got cheaper... in 3-5 years the value could bounce back and this may just look like a blip.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It all depends on whether the pension fund manager was smart and bought assets that traditionally increase in value... or if he's a dunce and invested in some hedge funds like all the stupid money did in the past decade.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:19:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: City Pension Fund $1.1 Billion in Debt</title><link>http://publicola.com/2012/08/01/city-pension-fund-1-1-billion-in-debt/#comment-607864378</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The assumption of a 7.75% rate of return is a tad high, but not &lt;br&gt;insane... Discount brokers like Vanguard have several annuities that &lt;br&gt;have about that rate for annuities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd argue that these kinds of pension funds would benefit from a split &lt;br&gt;pension... half of which is a fixed, defined benefit, and another half &lt;br&gt;is variable. Like 5% is guaranteed, the rest is not. Sort of like 'social security plus'&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:14:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Other Blogs Today: The NHL in Bellevue?, the Trash Strike, the 1st District, and More</title><link>http://publicola.com/2012/07/26/on-other-blogs-today-the-nhl-the-trash-strike-the-1st-district-and-more/#comment-598973339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So, recycling drivers start at $17/hour, and trash drivers start at $26/hour?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Call me crazy, but that seems fair. Recycling is far less stinky. I know lots of people who would be a recycling driver at that rate, but wouldn't be a garbage driver at that rate. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:03:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: June Jolt: What We Missed, Winners Edition</title><link>http://publicola.com/2012/07/09/june-jolt-what-we-missed-winners-edition/#comment-582567167</link><description>&lt;p&gt;" Democrats ... who were likely reluctant to vote for someone who was leading a battle against Obama, can now cast a vote for McKenna ... guilt free."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Um, no... &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Washington State experimented with health care reform without a mandate: it blew up. Despite this reality, McKenna spearheaded a campaign to repeal Obamacare... with no concern about practicality, nor any empathy for the thousands of people who would suffer and die because of a repeal... &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;McKenna proved nothing more than that he's a spiteful, partisan hack. Any Democrats who vote for him should not be surprised when he turns into the next Scott Walker.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:40:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: June Jolt: What We Missed, Losers Edition</title><link>http://publicola.com/2012/07/09/june-jolt-what-we-missed-losers-edition/#comment-582555102</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"$1.4 billion to repeal an earlier 20-cent fee"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WHAT??? 1.4 BILLION???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think you mean "million," yes?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:26:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Software Does Weird Things</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2012/06/07/software-does-weird-things/#comment-552269313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Rich hasn’t worked for me since he left for Atlassian (@atlassian) last August, but being the rockstar that he is, apparently, he’s still a profit center."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;LOL...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 16:13:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More WebCenter Sites Resources</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2012/05/30/more-webcenter-sites-resources/#comment-545221779</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'ami' ?  short for 'amigo' ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:27:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recap of the Apps UX Gamification Design Jam</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2012/05/23/recap-of-the-apps-ux-gamification-design-jam/#comment-537424434</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bex's First Law of Gamification: If your system is a game, then people will game the system ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looks like I missed a lot of fun this week! Dang...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 08:38:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Next Tour Stop: An Apps UX Design Jam</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2012/05/14/next-tour-stop-an-apps-ux-design-jam/#comment-531275534</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I suck... Client having a meltdown on production, and they want me on site next week to fix it, so I'm going to miss this gamification seminar :-(&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I saw the starter presentation, tho... lots of good points. But, missing some important ones. One of the BIG problems with gamification is that people want INSTANT feedback on when they did something good. This can be a very bad thing... because in many cases you don't know if an action was actually good until weeks/months/years later. Not enough talk about long-term feedback loops in games, IMHO.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 12:36:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally, a Good Starting Point for Why Software is Hard</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2012/05/15/finally-a-good-starting-point-for-why-software-is-hard/#comment-530663113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oldie but goodie... My opinion is that software is hard because it's more like gene-splicing than anything engineering or construction related:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://bexhuff.com/2008/07/software-design-is-gene-splicing" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bexhuff.com/2008/07/software-design-is-gene-splicing"&gt;http://bexhuff.com/2008/07/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's also the inherent problem that both good and bad developers have strong incentives to wring overly complex code. Bad developers do it to mask incompetence... Good developers do it because they're bored with simple code:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://bexhuff.com/2008/06/why-do-so-many-developers-love-bafflingly-complex-code" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bexhuff.com/2008/06/why-do-so-many-developers-love-bafflingly-complex-code"&gt;http://bexhuff.com/2008/06/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:41:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oracle WebCenter Sites 11gR1 Released</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2012/05/01/oracle-webcenter-sites-11gr1-released/#comment-517770265</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Still no Jump Start Kit, tho? Bummer... Unless it's buried deep in that download...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The new contribution interface is pretty slick, tho. I look forward to playing with that!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 12:18:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Don&amp;#8217;t Get the iPad, There I Said It</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2012/03/09/i-dont-get-the-ipad-there-i-said-it/#comment-465479756</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's why I like the iPad:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) portable streaming HD video: from the dining room, to the kitchen, to the bedroom&lt;br&gt;2) a skype appliance: front and back facing cameras with a big screen are handy when grandparents want to see their new grandchild&lt;br&gt;3) consuming RSS feeds&lt;br&gt;4) reading -- not writing -- email&lt;br&gt;5) some games&lt;br&gt;6) pandora&lt;br&gt;7) much faster than a smart phone&lt;br&gt;8) better battery life than a smart phone&lt;br&gt;9) charges a LOT faster than a smart phone&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Other than that... yeah, it's a kind of status symbol. I do think that there is a kind of "critical mass" where something becomes much more intuitive, and then crazy popular for reasons hard for tech geeks to understand... sort of like why everybody flocked to the iPod even tho bigger/better/clunkier MP3 players were available.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:23:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WaPo’s Ezra Should Have De-Kleined - FishbowlDC</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/fishbowldc/wapos-ezra-should-have-de-kleined/57662#comment-374463700</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ezra claims it was not a "briefing," it was a discussion, where the supercommittee was barely touched upon:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/no-i-didnt-brief-senate-democrats/2011/08/25/gIQAEubf5N_blog.html?wprss=ezra-klein" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/no-i-didnt-brief-senate-democrats/2011/08/25/gIQAEubf5N_blog.html?wprss=ezra-klein"&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So... a neutral person should take his word over anonymous accusations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:43:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome Remote Desktop</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2011/10/10/chrome-remote-desktop/#comment-331759332</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If Chrome had a larger user base, this would be a big win... but, at present if the first step of desktop sharing is "go download application XYZ," we're not much closer from a usability standpoint.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is it peer-to-peer plugin to Chrome, or does it need a web server running somewhere?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:01:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can We Stop Building Tools to Convert Users to Developers?</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2011/09/13/can-we-stop-building-tools-to-convert-users-to-developers/#comment-320556827</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know which products you mean... but professional courtesy prevents me from criticizing by name ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have you ever read "No Silver Bullet"? People have been promising a world where non-developers could develop applications for well over 30 years... and nobody has gotten even close:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://bexhuff.com/2006/10/no-silver-bullet" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bexhuff.com/2006/10/no-silver-bullet"&gt;http://bexhuff.com/2006/10/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can non-programmers make trivial applications? Yes. Can they make useful applications? No.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But... if marketing dupes yet another generation into believing the impossible to purchase an unnecessary upgrade, then marketing did exactly what they were paid to do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can We Stop Building Tools to Convert Users to Developers?</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2011/09/13/can-we-stop-building-tools-to-convert-users-to-developers/#comment-320379643</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think probably the only counter-example is Microsoft Excel. Not the macro language, mind you, but the ability to visually spit out a bunch of numbers into a chart... then tweak a few starting numbers and get different results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's not really a "program" per se, but that kind of applied fourth-grade-math is about the best you can expect from a non-developer.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:09:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Seattle: Let&amp;#8217;s shut up and start building some companies</title><link>https://www.geekwire.com/2011/faster-seattles-route-solid-startup-community/#comment-303706924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To clarify: I agree with Kirill that Seattle entrepreneurs need to work harder and quit whining... but I disagree with Ray when he says flat-out that ecosystems "don't matter." There's a lot of data to show that they do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But... as long as you get the right people in a room collaborating in the right way, and coming up with a plan that "plays to their strengths," then anything is possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:03:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Seattle: Let&amp;#8217;s shut up and start building some companies</title><link>https://www.geekwire.com/2011/faster-seattles-route-solid-startup-community/#comment-303117296</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In my opinion, the main reason for businesses to avoid the Bay Area is to get better software talent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I recently moved from Minneapolis to Seattle. Where I'm from, we call it the "Hollywood Effect." Basically, if you are a "good" actor, you can probably find work in any major city. If you are a "bad" actor, your only hope is to move to Hollywood and get lucky.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The same rule applies to software. If you're a "good" developer, you can get a decent job in any major city. If you're a "bad" developer, your only hope is to blend in where employers are dripping with cash and desperate for warm bodies: Silicon Valley.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Easy access to capital is a major double-edged sword... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:44:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Seattle: Let&amp;#8217;s shut up and start building some companies</title><link>https://www.geekwire.com/2011/faster-seattles-route-solid-startup-community/#comment-303110188</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The current data does not support your hypothesis. Ecosystems do indeed matter:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/images/issues/200510/world-is-spiky.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/images/issues/200510/world-is-spiky.pdf"&gt;http://www.theatlantic.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Basically, there are "pockets" in the world where innovation happens much faster than other places. There are several theories as to why this is the case... but basically no man is an island. We are all affected by our environment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But... end of the day this just means Seattle needs to ditch the Silicon Valley playbook: there's a million ways to build a great company. And if that means you just have to work a bit harder, then so be it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:32:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thanks and Good Luck Rich</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2011/08/22/thanks-and-good-luck-rich/#comment-294120699</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have fun a Atlassian, Rich! Sad to see you go...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:59:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google to Acquire Motorola Mobility</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2011/08/15/google-to-acquire-motorola-mobility/#comment-287603752</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, I think this is 10% about their technology, and 90% about their patents...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some corporate Google smack-down might be able to shake up the lethargy that has defined Motorola for the past 5 years... plus there's a good chance Google will lure away the hardware "alpha" geeks that previously would all have preferred Apple. So, end of the day they can salvage something from the actual business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still... it's all about the patents. Google was surprisingly naive about this when they charged into hardware... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:03:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>