<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Jens</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/be25cb65d458887f3ec7dfb859f70d96/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:01:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Small boards are usually better</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/small_boards_are_usually_better/#comment-4456212</link><description>I guess you can only add limited value to anything, when you only spend half a day per month on it and then the interaction happens in a larger group.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example, say you have a friend. You meet her in a group of seven once per month. How much are you really 'in' her life? Do you really know what is going on? How do you expect to know and understand of what is going on in her life in that group setting? Even if you were the 'best' friend in the world, you would find it pretty hard to 'add value', I guess.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you want to add value, you need to spend time with people. One-on-one. Otherwise, you are really just an observer, who can occasionally comment. That is fine, but that is probably not what people would understand as having a close friend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why should boards be different?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jens</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:01:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>