<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for James</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/bdc9394834e8226583ff02867f06c609/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:52:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Graph Theory: Part II (Linear Algebra) | 20bits</title><link>http://20bits.disqus.com/graph_theory_part_ii_linear_algebra_20bits/#comment-3793400</link><description>Interesting stuff. I had read about incidence matricies before, but hadn't seen a graph theory representation. By the way, I think there's an inconsistancy between your definition of the incidence matrix and the incidence matrix for C4 (did you mean m verticies and n columns, where the matrix is mxn?) Your graph of C4 also has the bottom two verticies interchanged.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:52:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>