<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Jim</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/bd9ef10c0d3e7f4691eb98f3364291a4/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:42:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sexpigeon - Hi. I don’t normally make big purchases. I am...</title><link>http://sexpigeon.disqus.com/sexpigeon_hi_i_dont_normally_make_big_purchases_i_am/#comment-23056728</link><description>Anything to make it unique? Like a sticker from the store, or the ID number, or accessories?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In solidarity...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:42:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Day 12: Waiting</title><link>http://banane.disqus.com/day_12_waiting/#comment-4733530</link><description>Wow, nice photo. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Tanker" s/b ship or container ship.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:07:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canon Announces New 40D DSLR Camera</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/canon_announces_new_40d_dslr_camera/#comment-1808861</link><description>Believe the street price will be $1300. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, the 40D will be a much better choice for most people, unless they really value being able to get the most out of bright wide-angle lenses and/or specialty lenses (such as a 15mm fish-eye or 24mm tilt-shift).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:04:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fujifilm FinePix F50 SE, A Powerful Point-And-Shoot Camera</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/fujifilm_finepix_f50_se_a_powerful_point_and_shoot_camera/#comment-1809361</link><description>An SE is no different from an fd, basically. Possible difference in finish - gun metal vs. silver. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/digital-cameras/fuji-finepix-f20_question.html?qid=9043" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/digital-cameras...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looks like a great little cam.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:33:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mr. T &amp;#038; William Shatner Featured in World of Warcraft Commercials</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/mr_t_038_william_shatner_featured_in_world_of_warcraft_commercials/#comment-1810000</link><description>High-larious. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Videos appear to have been disappeared.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another option:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z_0BSTsCEU&amp;amp;watch_response" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z_0BSTsCEU&amp;amp;...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:57:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloggers Divided Over Lane Hartwell Photography Issue</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/bloggers_divided_over_lane_hartwell_photography_issue/#comment-1810206</link><description>If that is the entire defense -- the video is a parody so we can use any photo we want under fair use -- then the singing group doesn't really have a defense. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, if you posted the snapshot to ridicule it (not sure how one would do that) or to illustrate a point about how to adjust  white balance or fix chromatic aberation, that would be a different story. You'd have at least an good argument that your use was fair. Which side would win? That would depend on a host of details.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The singing group and the shutterbug might be having a symbiotic relationship going, whether they realize it or not.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:24:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: $99,000 Canon 1200mm f/5.6L EF USM Super Telephoto Lens</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/99000_canon_1200mm_f56l_ef_usm_super_telephoto_lens/#comment-1810890</link><description>No mention of the tripod, which should be included.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;$550 for UPS ground delivery. That's negotiable. As is the price for the lens itself. Still available. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A 600mm IS 4.0 with a 2x extender and/or a 800mm 5.6 IS might be preferable alternatives.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank the European Union for the discontinuation of this lens. Not enough demand to make Canon convert to lead-free glass.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROHS" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROHS&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:10:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scientology Responds to Anonymous As 2nd Global Protest Nears</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/scientology_responds_to_anonymous_as_2nd_global_protest_nears/#comment-1811263</link><description>All the videos get taken down after an hour or so of being posted. They are all the same with a complaint about  Anonymous and then the outing of an alleged  member. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The jpg at the bottom of this page tells the story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Sean_carasov" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Sean_carasov&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:44:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Night Photos of Michael Jackson&amp;#8217;s Neverland Ranch</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/night_photos_of_michael_jackson8217s_neverland_ranch/#comment-1811301</link><description>MJ is innocent ? News to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here are some recent daytime photos from the air that show NL in a state of disrepair. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/03/10/jackos-neverland-ran.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.boingboing.net/2008/03/10/jackos-nev...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:21:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Giant LEGO Boulder Chases Indiana Jones Down San Francisco Hill</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/giant_lego_boulder_chases_indiana_jones_down_san_francisco_hill/#comment-1812031</link><description>Or styrofoam. Some believe that it was made 100% from foam&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/87457200%40N00/2507771708/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/87457200@N00/25077...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://flickr.com/photos/chasingfun/2476629848/sizes/o/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://flickr.com/photos/chasingfun/2476629848/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:10:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Giant LEGO Boulder Chases Indiana Jones Down San Francisco Hill</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/giant_lego_boulder_chases_indiana_jones_down_san_francisco_hill/#comment-1812038</link><description>This photo was pulled from Flickr. Via Googlecache:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:fcD3h_-gLgAJ:www.flickr.com/photos/chasingfun/2506153030/+%2522Giant+LEGO+Ball+Was+Styrofoam%2522&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;cd=1&amp;amp;gl=us" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:fcD3h_-gLg...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Highly unlikely to have so much street parking available on both sides of the street at any time of the day or night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Imagine the Indy character got paid, had worker's comp, insurance, etc.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:27:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>