<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for TC</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/bd5d29dc07ea3e3609018aa8210009ca/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:25:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: So You Want European-Style Health Care?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/so_you_want_european_style_health_care/#comment-21899816</link><description>Should have been in reply to the guy who is a shining example of the fact that someone can graduate at the bottom of their class and still manage to practice medicine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:25:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So You Want European-Style Health Care?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/so_you_want_european_style_health_care/#comment-21879275</link><description>There have always been politicians.  Government is an organization with the monopoly on violence, and politicians are the people who control those who "are allowed" to inflict violence on others.&lt;br&gt;Even Somalia has a government, it's just spread out among tribes and gangs, each of which have the monopoly on violence in the area that they control.  And those that control those tribes and gangs are politicians.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:37:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heartbroken</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/heartbroken/#comment-31509</link><description>I presume you are aware that Ian Astbury of The Cult said on stage that they would be touring in 2008 in support of a reformed band whose two part name started with L and Z?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:47:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heartbroken</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/heartbroken/#comment-35408</link><description>Who owns their rights though? Is it actually the band themselves/bad advice or management or some outside entity?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:52:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Roundup: Murdoch on media and politics, Intelius a scam?, and more</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/roundup_murdoch_on_media_and_politics_intelius_a_scam_and_more/#comment-559980</link><description>"the iPhone SDK and Google’s Android both have the most momentum when it comes to offering meaningful ways for third party developers to build mobile applications. Taking into account their out-of-the-gate lead, the name of Microsoft’s offering already seems a little ironic"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are kidding right?  How does the iPhone and Android have an out of the gate lead?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Symbian, Windows Mobile, et al have been on the market for years with millions of devices sold and thousands of applications in the market place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:59:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interview Questions: Two Bowling Balls | 20bits</title><link>http://20bits.disqus.com/interview_questions_two_bowling_balls_20bits/#comment-3941446</link><description>Those are some intelligent, logical solutions you've provided.  Kudos on your cleverness and ability to figure that out on the spot in an interview setting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I probably would have turned the question around on the interviewer and asked how resilient the bowling ball needed to be?  Did it need to survive 10 floors?  15?  Why were we doing the resiliency test in the first place?  Developers who take the requirements at face value without understanding the motivation aren't nearly as valuable as the ones who can see past what is being asked for and find a simpler solution that delivers the underlying need.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it turned out we just needed it to survive falling from 15 stories, I would have dropped one ball from the 15th floor window and if it survived it passed our test otherwise it didn't.  One step, and we save a ball.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:29:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Serve Well and Be Well Served</title><link>http://gcn.disqus.com/serve_well_and_be_well_served_262/#comment-6496166</link><description>Should be a leaky condom ...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:23:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amanda on &amp;#8220;Hannity&amp;#8221; - FOX NEWS - Friday Feb 20, 2009</title><link>http://sometimesdaily.disqus.com/amanda_on_8220hannity8221_fox_news_friday_feb_20_2009/#comment-6536653</link><description>Great job Amanda!  Do they tell you ahead of time what topics they plan to raise?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:02:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Am a Dysonite II</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/i_am_a_dysonite_ii/#comment-7523070</link><description>If there's one thing I've learned from working in software, it's that what the customer wants and what they ask for can be completely different things.&lt;br&gt;It's my opinion that these computer generated climate models that the alarmist love to tout are a result not of giving the customer what they asked for, but rather what they want.&lt;br&gt;Politically motivated studies serve one purpose, and that is to justify policy.&lt;br&gt;Handing politicians complete control over our energy supplies is giving them absolute power over our lives.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:51:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happy Update Day!</title><link>http://iphonedev.disqus.com/happy_update_day/#comment-1848091</link><description>You probably did in recovery mode, put in DFU mode and repeat the whole process, then it should work. For further info on the difference, check out google and youtube</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:07:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happy Update Day!</title><link>http://iphonedev.disqus.com/happy_update_day/#comment-1848099</link><description>exactly</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:09:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: remove html tags from a file | UNIX | Tech-Recipes</title><link>http://tech-recipes.disqus.com/remove_html_tags_from_a_file_unix_tech_recipes/#comment-3908135</link><description>Awesome!  Thanks heaps for sharing</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:57:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scary iSight Trick | Joseph Crawford</title><link>http://josephcrawford.disqus.com/scary_isight_trick_joseph_crawford/#comment-3575396</link><description>Before you freak out (oops, too late), this functionality is no different than a web cam, if you add AppleScript/Javascript/WhateverScript to upload to a web server.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Big deal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:44:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scary iSight Trick | Joseph Crawford</title><link>http://josephcrawford.disqus.com/scary_isight_trick_joseph_crawford/#comment-3575424</link><description>Check out this version, which also uses your microphone: &lt;a href="http://www.uccs.edu/%7Ecbrewer/gigo_files/ab0273a8deaa53e2de475736042cd62b-14.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.uccs.edu/~cbrewer/gigo_files/ab0273a...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:54:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: letters to crushes - M,
 I thought having your number would be awesome,...</title><link>http://crushes.disqus.com/letters_to_crushes_m_i_thought_having_your_number_would_be_awesome/#comment-12237733</link><description>ditto.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:18:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Exclusive interview with artist/producer T-Pain, who is know for his use of Antares Auto-Tune.</title><link>http://electricmusician.disqus.com/exclusive_interview_with_artistproducer_t_pain_who_is_know_for_his_use_of_antares_auto_tune/#comment-7827033</link><description>He doesn't want to sound the same and continues to change things he says, but his auto-tune thing is in everything he does, so he DOES sound the same! He can't sing!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 11:07:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steven Wilson of Porcupine Tree Interviewed in EM March 2009</title><link>http://electricmusician.disqus.com/steven_wilson_of_porcupine_tree_interviewed_in_em_march_2009/#comment-7827094</link><description>What's with all the dark stuff, this guy is a real turn-off! Do interviews of people who are positive artists please. Enough of this music for sad rich kids.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 11:11:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 15 Web Hoaxes of All Time</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/top_15_web_hoaxes_of_all_time/#comment-13296264</link><description>What about "fresh diamonds in the microwave?"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:12:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: phodroid | joethevisualist</title><link>http://phodroid.disqus.com/phodroid_joethevisualist_242/#comment-10956915</link><description>hehehehehe</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:08:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: phodroid | joethevisualist</title><link>http://phodroid.disqus.com/phodroid_joethevisualist_242/#comment-10956925</link><description>looks like hat head</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:08:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fun with Post-its (Our First Post!)</title><link>http://zoomdoggle.disqus.com/fun_with_post_its_our_first_post/#comment-7340501</link><description>Better yet, what can be done with bendy-straws?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:58:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unnecessary Knowledge</title><link>http://zoomdoggle.disqus.com/unnecessary_knowledge/#comment-7341018</link><description>Yodeling has been banned in 14 countries.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:46:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Try the Shoot Booth</title><link>http://zoomdoggle.disqus.com/try_the_shoot_booth/#comment-7341124</link><description>This... is... awesome.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 01:27:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Add Walken &amp;#038; Cowbell</title><link>http://zoomdoggle.disqus.com/add_walken_038_cowbell/#comment-7341285</link><description>Ever so slightly let down. Granted I tried belling La Bouche. No amount of Walken can fix that mess.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:05:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Test Your Short Term Memory</title><link>http://zoomdoggle.disqus.com/test_your_short_term_memory/#comment-7341996</link><description>Fear not, I got stuck on the first one too. It gets easier until about the fourth level. Then all bets are off.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:46:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Play Orbash</title><link>http://zoomdoggle.disqus.com/play_orbash/#comment-7342005</link><description>I like the music. Sooooooothing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:39:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Intraday SPY Indication Of Interest Update</title><link>http://zerohedge.disqus.com/intraday_spy_indication_of_interest_update/#comment-10634880</link><description>...And after some thought the Cowboy said, "O.K. fuckit, do it again; I'll play.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:06:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Apple nixed my iPhone app</title><link>http://techflash.disqus.com/why_apple_nixed_my_iphone_app/#comment-15988613</link><description>You've got no information about other apps in the store that may be pending release and named whatever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps Apple has info that you don't and is acting reasonably. Someone beat you to the bell and you simply don't realize it...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:32:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free RapidShare.COM Premium Account</title><link>http://liewcf.disqus.com/free_rapidsharecom_premium_account/#comment-13724250</link><description>i wish i would've known before i bought my &lt;a href="http://rapidshare.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;rapidshare.com&lt;/a&gt; account....sucks.....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:08:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rein in that Bias</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/rein_in_that_bias/#comment-13611877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;There&amp;#39;s probably some I&amp;#39;m forgetting. But haven&amp;#39;t we done all these things the last 30 years?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not really.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Men of System Systematically Misunderstand Spontaneous Orders</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/men_of_system_systematically_misunderstand_spontaneous_orders/#comment-13612130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;If classical liberals want to win, they first must take back the language.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ain&amp;#39;t that the truth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The proponents of positive rights have twisted the language to the point where you are a greedy meanie if you wish to deny that to which someone else is entitled, rather than showing righteous indignation at being forced to pay for something that you don&amp;#39;t want in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Perspective on Living Standards</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/perspective_on_living_standards/#comment-13612165</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Income inequality gives me incentive to work hard knowing that I can raise my standard of living.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If everything was equal I&amp;#39;d have no reason to get out of bed.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Perspective on Living Standards</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/perspective_on_living_standards/#comment-13612168</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;but an unlimited entitlement of lords to consume the profit of organizations they govern is not.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;What&amp;#39;s the alternative?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Government confiscation?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I see Bill Gates using much of his wealth for charitable purposes, when the government would just waste it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I guess a difference is that you can&amp;#39;t use bribes to influence Gates&amp;#39; charitable giving, but you can use bribes to influence politicians.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moon Struck</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/moon_struck/#comment-13612231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Is a moon shot really as wondrous as the intricate coordination of the plans and actions of these countless suppliers and consumers?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To this I would have to say yes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it as worthwhile?  No.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Royalty Stinks</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/royalty_stinks/#comment-13612263</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://images4.cafepress.com/product/303725914v4_350x350_Front.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt; B. O. Stinks &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When to let a bank fail</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/when_to_let_a_bank_fail/#comment-13612285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The profits encourage risk-taking. The losses encourage prudence.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Exactly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s Powerful?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/who8217s_powerful/#comment-13612340</link><description>&lt;p&gt;People seem to forget that government is simply an organization to which we have granted the right to use force - to protect us from others who would use force upon us.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama, Supply-Sider</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/barack_obama_supply_sider/#comment-13612364</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;tax that contributes revenue to open, democratically established federal programs&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s a joke, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama, Supply-Sider</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/barack_obama_supply_sider/#comment-13612374</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Once again a full two thirds of the posts are about Danny Boy, not the good host and his post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cafe Kuehn indeed. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama, Supply-Sider</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/barack_obama_supply_sider/#comment-13612377</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Vote VikingVista in 2010.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;You got my vote!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Too bad the only way to get elected these days is to promise more government, not less.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama, Supply-Sider</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/barack_obama_supply_sider/#comment-13612382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;So it&amp;#39;s ok for Obama to &amp;quot;skim off the top&amp;quot; but not for tin-pot dictators? Unfair I say!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since when have people in politics been bound by the same rules they expect everyone else to follow?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama, Supply-Sider</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/barack_obama_supply_sider/#comment-13612384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;However, you can&amp;#39;t have a policy calling for organized, predictable corruption.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah you can.  It&amp;#39;s called government.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Win-Win</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/a_win_win/#comment-13612600</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;What amazes me on this site is how many people with views contrary to those of the many on this site not only accept the theft but actually advocate for more of it.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The impression I get from muirgeo and his fellow anti-Capitalist statists is that they sees profit as theft, and the government rights that wrong through progressive taxation and wealth redistribution.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Win-Win</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/a_win_win/#comment-13612606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;How is profit theft? How does that argument work? I&amp;#39;m not sure I&amp;#39;ve heard it.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the argument goes something like - I work for the evil profiteer who earns money off my labor.  I am paid a fraction of what I produce, and the evil profiteer pockets the difference.  So that evil profiteer is stealing from the sweat of my brow, and it is the duty of the government to seize those ill gotten gains and distribute them fairly and equitably.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mind you I&amp;#39;m neither putting forth this argument nor saying that it is what you believe, but I&amp;#39;m pretty sure muirgeo believes it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&amp;#39;s the only way I can see to rationalize government theft as a good thing.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Two wrongs make a right (assuming profit is theft and thus wrong).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Win-Win</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/a_win_win/#comment-13612612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;You are the ones making excuses for profiteers who work by obsfucating price,demand and supply mechanisms. Allowing only insiders to know the real quantities and values.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I thought an object&amp;#39;s value was what someone was willing to pay for it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If it costs me five dollars to produce something, and someone else is willing to pay a hundred dollars for it, is it worth five dollars or a hundred dollars?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wages at Wal-Mart</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/wages_at_wal_mart/#comment-13612657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The only legitimate argument that the government should pay for health care is the fact that the government mandates that health care professionals offer their services without regards to ability to pay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the government is going to use threat of force to coerce people into serving others, the least it could do is pay them for it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then again two wrongs do not make a right.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubris Universal</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/hubris_universal/#comment-13612689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Success depends on the goals.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Was the goal in Vietnam to win, or to pump money into the manufacturers of military hardware?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the goal was the latter then it was a rousing success.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is the goal of universal health care to provide access to medical services, or to shut down the insurance industry while guaranteeing that certain people get paid?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is the goal of this &amp;quot;green economy&amp;quot; to end our dependence on fossil fuels, or to penalize one industry while mandating we purchase products from another?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or perhaps I&amp;#39;m a raging cynic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubris Universal</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/hubris_universal/#comment-13612705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;In the end, it was just another pointless exercise in military mayhem.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wouldn&amp;#39;t say it was pointless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The MIC made a fortune.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Replace the M with Medical and you get the reason we need universal health care.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Though I&amp;#39;m sure that universal health care will cost a lot more than sixty thousand American lives.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Only at GMU</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/only_at_gmu/#comment-13612743</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Graffito in a MIT lavatory... Heisenberg might have been here&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Psychology of Climate Change and Intervention</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/the_psychology_of_climate_change_and_intervention/#comment-13612839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The sheer idiocy of this whole notion is incredible.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is not idiocy at all if you look at it from a standpoint of power.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whip the people up into a frenzy that the world is going to end, then propose a solution that involves controlling every aspect of their lives.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Get the people fearful enough and they&amp;#39;ll beg you to take away their freedom.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;People are begging for a totalitarian world government to save us from ourselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s not idiocy, it&amp;#39;s a brilliant power grab.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Fee-for-Service Explain Rising Health-Care Costs?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/does_fee_for_service_explain_rising_health_care_costs/#comment-13612913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why should they hypocrite pediatrician give his services to the poor for free or at a reduced rate when he is guaranteed payment from the government?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Fee-for-Service Explain Rising Health-Care Costs?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/does_fee_for_service_explain_rising_health_care_costs/#comment-13612917</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like Mr Grove finally figured out that the only difference between government and organized crime is the number of guns.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Fee-for-Service Explain Rising Health-Care Costs?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/does_fee_for_service_explain_rising_health_care_costs/#comment-13612921</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I do take issue with the &amp;quot;finally&amp;quot;.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;My apologies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Fee-for-Service Explain Rising Health-Care Costs?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/does_fee_for_service_explain_rising_health_care_costs/#comment-13612923</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Why? Because that&amp;#39;s what you believe?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;No, semantics.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Fee-for-Service Explain Rising Health-Care Costs?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/does_fee_for_service_explain_rising_health_care_costs/#comment-13612925</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Please provide a source.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would but it&amp;#39;s &lt;a href="http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2007/02/08/common-sense-is-dead-and-buried/" rel="nofollow"&gt;dead.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Fee-for-Service Explain Rising Health-Care Costs?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/does_fee_for_service_explain_rising_health_care_costs/#comment-13612926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dewey, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&amp;#39;re right in that insurance is whatever the contract says it is.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Treason Against Reason</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/treason_against_reason/#comment-13612974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder how many of the people crying over the death of M.J. are also caught up in the AGW hysteria?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Don&amp;#8217;t Want Those People to Have a Say in How I Live My Life</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/i_don8217t_want_those_people_to_have_a_say_in_how_i_live_my_life/#comment-13612992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Billy Mays had more impact on my life than M.J., that OxiClean stuff really works!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Don&amp;#8217;t Want Those People to Have a Say in How I Live My Life</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/i_don8217t_want_those_people_to_have_a_say_in_how_i_live_my_life/#comment-13613010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I&amp;#39;m with Adam on &amp;quot;Strawman. Find me someone who says that he is &amp;quot;some saint&amp;quot; and we can talk&amp;quot; and his reaction to Ike as well.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I didn&amp;#39;t get that from Don&amp;#39;s post, though I did from the one he referenced.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I gathered is that Don is observing that there are people prone to mass hysteria over a wide variety of things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some of those things, like M.J. dead a fifty, have no tangible effect on their lives.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yet these same people prone to mass hysteria are making decisions at the ballot box that directly effect Don&amp;#39;s life, and he&amp;#39;s not too happy about it.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would tend to agree.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where does power lie in Iran?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/where_does_power_lie_in_iran/#comment-13613185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Surely one #17 would be the same as another #17.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Who are you?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The new Number Two.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who is Number One?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are Number Seventeen.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not a number! I am a the president of Iran!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reasonable Ideology</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/reasonable_ideology/#comment-13640648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I certainly cannot compromise with any ideology that forces me to pay for something that I don&amp;#39;t want.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:00:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A little perspective</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/a_little_perspective/#comment-13640632</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like ex post facto matters.  Not that I have any sympathy for sex offenders, but forcing these people to register onto a registry that didn&amp;#39;t exist when they were convicted certainly constitutes ex post facto.  However nobody cares because sex offenders are considered sub-human.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Same thing with these bonuses, Constitution be damned as long as we get our revenge.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Though the bonuses are nothing but a red herring to distract us from the tens of billions of dollars funneled to foreign banks and other institutions (which I&amp;#39;m sure are giving out much bigger bonuses than AIG).&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:41:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A little perspective</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/a_little_perspective/#comment-13640636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are no Fourth Amendment rights, they&amp;#39;ve been superseded by the Drug War.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:38:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wisdom from Michael Lewis</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/wisdom_from_michael_lewis/#comment-13640664</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The mafia has to generate a profit for itself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The government generates a profit for it&amp;#39;s friends, and sticks us with the bill/debt.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&amp;#39;s even better than running a protection racket, because you not only force people to pay you, you force them to borrow money for you as well!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:16:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Roubini Get It Right?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/did_roubini_get_it_right/#comment-13640740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;TrUmPiT,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just curious, do you have any thoughts or criticisms of any of the ideas presented here, or do you just attack the presenter?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubris</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/hubris/#comment-13640834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t think Obama really cares.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This crisis is an opportunity to increase and consolidate power in the name of problem solving.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&amp;#39;m not even so sure that the guy has a clue about what he&amp;#39;s doing, except that he believes that the more power government has the better equipped government is to fix the economy.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course this is all based upon the false premise that a few select Harvard graduates with the power of government behind them can effectively command and control the economy.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:56:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubris</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/hubris/#comment-13640841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I, as well as most people here I&amp;#39;m guessing, could care less about Obama&amp;#39;s platform.  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&amp;#39;s his actions that we&amp;#39;re worried about.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like those people who call Reagan the crowned king of fiscal conservatism, seemingly forgetting that on his watch the government borrowed more money that all previous administrations combined.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The actions of the current administration, regardless of the stated platform, are leading us down a road where government and corporate industry are so intertwined as it becomes difficult to tell them apart.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wait a minute, that&amp;#39;s not Socialism.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&amp;#39;s that other one that starts with an &amp;#39;F&amp;#39;.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:01:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubris</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/hubris/#comment-13640847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the Socialist argument is vicious because each side is offended by the other.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those who support Socialism see anyone with more &amp;quot;stuff&amp;quot; than them as somehow committing a crime, and that &amp;quot;stuff&amp;quot; must be taken away and distributed in a fair and equitable manner.  They see anyone who does not support this as selfish and greedy, supportive of an unfair system that doesn&amp;#39;t guarantee financial equality.  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course they fail to realize (or care) that this &amp;quot;economic justice&amp;quot; requires people being unequal under the law.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And that&amp;#39;s the part where the non-Socialist have a problem.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:20:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubris</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/hubris/#comment-13640854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Agreement?  I&amp;#39;m haven&amp;#39;t figured out where you stand so I&amp;#39;m not quite sure.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems to me that your argument is a matter of semantics, that Obama isn&amp;#39;t a Socialist because what he&amp;#39;s doing doesn&amp;#39;t fit the dictionary definition of Socialism.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:42:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubris</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/hubris/#comment-13640863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see the word &amp;quot;meaningful&amp;quot; in there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Very nice.  Now the definitions of Socialism that matter are determined by you, and all others are meaningless?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Saying that socialism is a philosophy in which government force is used to promote &amp;quot;economic justice&amp;quot; wouldn&amp;#39;t be meaningful, because that&amp;#39;s what is happening.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Socialism as a system where industry is owned and controlled by government must also be a meaningless definition, since the government owns 80% of AIG.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If by &amp;quot;meaningful&amp;quot; you mean central planning with the government controlling all production and distribution, then I&amp;#39;d have to agree that Obama is not a Socialist.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:13:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubris</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/hubris/#comment-13640867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see.  One may not use the word Socialist unless it is directed at a person who agrees and practices 100% of the dictionary definition of Socialism, down to the last letter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow, I guess we&amp;#39;d better quit using adjectives in political discourse, since nobody fits any definition perfectly.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:32:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hubris</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/hubris/#comment-13640877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think of socialism as a system of involuntary charity.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the name of the greater good we are forced to fund programs in which we may or may not be eligible to participate.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does that fall into any textbook definition?  I doubt it.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I bet it would describe what many people think of when they use that particular word.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:53:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Behind the Marble Facade, It&amp;#039;s Thuggery</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/behind_the_marble_facade_it039s_thuggery/#comment-13640906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve always found it curious how so many people believe that problems caused by too much government can be solved by more government.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess it comes down to trust, and it seems that the majority trusts government.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Though I find even that to be curious when some of the most feared words one can hear after a knock on the door are &amp;quot;We&amp;#39;re from the government and we&amp;#39;re here to help you&amp;quot;.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:39:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Behind the Marble Facade, It&amp;#039;s Thuggery</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/behind_the_marble_facade_it039s_thuggery/#comment-13640911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;CRC - Something else I&amp;#39;ve noticed is that many judge words and ideas not on merit, but the source.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example if a hated talk radio personality, politician, etc says something then the opposite must be true by virtue of the source, not the words themselves.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:17:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Behind the Marble Facade, It&amp;#039;s Thuggery</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/behind_the_marble_facade_it039s_thuggery/#comment-13640916</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DK,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&amp;#39;m aware that Keynes is wrong, but I wasn&amp;#39;t aware he was hated.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as I&amp;#39;m concerned the only people who believe Keynes are politicians who use his work as an excuse to expand their power, people who don&amp;#39;t know any better because that&amp;#39;s all they were taught, and the haters of talk radio who believe he must be right because Rush says he&amp;#39;s wrong.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:38:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Behind the Marble Facade, It&amp;#039;s Thuggery</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/behind_the_marble_facade_it039s_thuggery/#comment-13640918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;CRC - exactly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:41:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Behind the Marble Facade, It&amp;#039;s Thuggery</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/behind_the_marble_facade_it039s_thuggery/#comment-13640919</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s nothing wrong with tariffs, they&amp;#39;re the government charging a fee for goods crossing a border that the government is tasked to protect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:47:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frenetic Fiddling</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/frenetic_fiddling/#comment-13641214</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see a future where corporate CEOs are all presidential appointees by virtue of the fact that the corporations all owe &amp;quot;the people&amp;quot; some bailout money.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Talk about control...&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:23:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frenetic Fiddling</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/frenetic_fiddling/#comment-13641222</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DK,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would agree with you except that the words &amp;quot;temporary&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;government&amp;quot; rarely coincide.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This whole bailout is nothing short of a power grab, and once a government gains power it rarely if ever relinquishes it willingly.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Precedent has now been set for the government to decide who runs a corporation, and what seems shocking now I&amp;#39;m quite positive (let me adjust my tinfoil hat) will be the norm in the not too distant future.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:43:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frenetic Fiddling</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/frenetic_fiddling/#comment-13641225</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DK,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Granted there&amp;#39;s a difference between the government absorbing a corporation and deciding who runs it, however what both cases have in common is a government appointed CEO.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:48:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frenetic Fiddling</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/frenetic_fiddling/#comment-13641235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems we&amp;#39;ve got two camps here.  Those who see nationalization and totalitarianism around the corner, and those who say &amp;quot;Prove it!  I won&amp;#39;t believe anything unless it is documented in triplicate, peer reviewed, full consensus, and endorsed by at least ten celebrities.  Anthropogenic Global Warming is fact, encroachment of our civil liberties is a fiction dreamed up by paranoid tinfoil hat wearers.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Am I far off?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:44:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frenetic Fiddling</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/frenetic_fiddling/#comment-13641238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;But I have a feeling it&amp;#39;s going to play out somewhat differently and Obama will not end up being another Putin or Chavez.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not if he has anything to do with it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That giggle we heard in that interview with Steve Kroft was not a nervous twitter of a man accustomed to a teleprompter, rather the intoxicated laughter of someone who is drunk with power.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:49:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frenetic Fiddling</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/frenetic_fiddling/#comment-13641245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DK,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You seem to be attracted to quick movements, which means you don&amp;#39;t see the boogey men because they are moving too slowly to catch your attention, and so large that you must step backwards to view them in their entirety.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:04:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frenetic Fiddling</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/frenetic_fiddling/#comment-13641252</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;you may find patterns that you want to find, not patterns that really exist.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ll give you that.  But something doesn&amp;#39;t need a large group of people to agree upon it to be true, and a large group of people can agree on something that is false.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure that Obama and company are specifically trying to expand government power for power&amp;#39;s sake, I think they really believe in what they are doing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Continually expanding regulations at the price of liberty and choice can only lead to totalitarianism where every movement requires a permit or supervision.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&amp;#39;s an incoming tide of government encroachment, with an inevitable result of a totalitarian state.  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Forward and back, forward and back, but always more forward than back. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:39:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frenetic Fiddling</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/frenetic_fiddling/#comment-13641255</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yet another Dave,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I keep hoping we can have a peaceful revolution at the ballot box, but I&amp;#39;m losing hope.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems to me that we&amp;#39;re at a tipping point where nearly half the population is what I call &amp;#39;adult children&amp;#39;, that is children in adult bodies in need of someone to take care of them.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They will always vote for the one who promises the most, not caring who is hurt by it anymore than a spoiled child cares about anything outside their selfish interests.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:51:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Frenetic Fiddling</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/frenetic_fiddling/#comment-13641259</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yet another Dave,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder what could be done to change things and stop that snowball, but I fear it is too late.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People once put more value upon something earned vs a gift, but now the distinction is increasingly vague.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We&amp;#39;ve got so many people getting these gifts from the government that they believe are theirs.  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Words such as &amp;quot;deserve&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;owe&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;fair&amp;quot; have been distorted into concepts that require the government taking from one and giving a gift to another.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&amp;#39;t think it can be stopped.  At best we can slow it down enough to prepare for the worst, but no I don&amp;#39;t think it can be stopped.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:08:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Engineering Vs. Piecemeal, Competitive Creation</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/social_engineering_vs_piecemeal_competitive_creation/#comment-13641335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;What they don&amp;#39;t realize is that many negatives were produced by previous attempts at social engineering (alcohol prohibition and organized crime, drug prohibition and violent crime in the U.S. and Mexico).&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m cynical enough to believe that the negative effects of social engineering are looked upon as opportunities for more social engineering.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take the violence associated with black market drug sales or the overflowing prisons that wouldn&amp;#39;t exist if the drugs were legal.  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is not a reason to repeal puritanical legislation, but rather an opportunity to impose greater restrictions on firearms as well as increased monitoring of citizens&amp;#39; private lives.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Trust me, these people know exactly what they are doing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:06:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Engineering Vs. Piecemeal, Competitive Creation</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/social_engineering_vs_piecemeal_competitive_creation/#comment-13641343</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m trying to remember when, other than the repeal of Prohibition, that our government has admitted fault (attacking the opposition party doesn&amp;#39;t count).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:56:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Engineering Vs. Piecemeal, Competitive Creation</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/social_engineering_vs_piecemeal_competitive_creation/#comment-13641345</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DK,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Joe has a valid point.  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any use of government force that is not to prevent force or fraud, however well intentioned, goes against the core of libertarianism.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You seem to see &amp;quot;legitimate&amp;quot; uses of government force outside those narrow boundaries, which puts you immediately at odds with those who call themselves libertarians.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 08:04:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Engineering Vs. Piecemeal, Competitive Creation</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/social_engineering_vs_piecemeal_competitive_creation/#comment-13641347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;grew out of that though&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Funny, I was a liberal while in college but I grew out of that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Without telling you my life story, suffice it to say that circumstances forced me to question and finally relinquish any faith that I had in government, kind of like a Christian realizing that man created god.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 08:09:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Engineering Vs. Piecemeal, Competitive Creation</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/social_engineering_vs_piecemeal_competitive_creation/#comment-13641350</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;trust, rebellion, realism?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;From what I&amp;#39;ve gathered you went back to trust.  Perhaps in a more limited way, but still back to trust.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 08:32:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Voice Consistently Powerful and Liberal</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/a_voice_consistently_powerful_and_liberal/#comment-13641378</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The Right tries, but seems to fail pretty generally.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;d say that the Left has perfected the art of attacking the arguer rather than the argument (Olbermann&amp;#39;s Worst Person in the World), while the Right is more likely to engage in straw man tactics (anything that comes out of Hannity&amp;#39;s mouth).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:29:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Media</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/big_media/#comment-13641538</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Government, at least in Alabama, has become an arm of corporate interests and no longer a contract between the citizens of the state.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Evil corporations are unable to impose anything on you without the aid of government, yet you fear corporations more than government?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;That doesn&amp;#39;t make any sense to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 06:01:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keynesianism Vs. Coordination</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/keynesianism_vs_coordination/#comment-13641700</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where dg goes, Godwin follows.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 04:05:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gifted in Nepal</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/gifted_in_nepal/#comment-13642714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Is there any doubt that if the founding fathers could have known that Washington would ever be extracting $3 trillion a year from us and demanding more, that they would have re-written the Constitution with more constraints?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;They did.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the Constitution, as originally written, taxes levied on income needed to be distributed back according to census, not the whim of federal blackmailers.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In addition the Senate was chosen by the States, not the people, so the States actually had representation in Washington.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If those two things had been kept in place the feds would have been unable to blackmail the States as they do, and the State governments tasked with implementing all these mandates would have had a voice.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:48:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Opportunity for &amp;#039;Progressives&amp;#039; to Put Their Money Where Their Mouths Are</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/another_opportunity_for_039progressives039_to_put_their_money_where_their_mouths_are/#comment-13642610</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If this bill makes payday loans unprofitable, then the intent must be to put them out of business.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So one must ask why.  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it to protect consumers?  Yeah right.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My cynical guess is that the sponsors of this bill have friends in the banking industry who see dollar signs in the form of overdrafts and other fees.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve always believed that anyone who seeks power cannot be trusted with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:03:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Is Medical Care Unnecessarily Expensive?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/why_is_medical_care_unnecessarily_expensive/#comment-13642734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In that restaurant everyone pays an equal share.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I don&amp;#39;t see this analogy as being very accurate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;To be more accurate you&amp;#39;d have 20 of the 100 customers being paid a couple dollars to eat, 5 of the them paying a grand for a salad, with graduated rates in between.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:12:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Is Medical Care Unnecessarily Expensive?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/why_is_medical_care_unnecessarily_expensive/#comment-13642737</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is it that medical professionals are required to provide their services without any regards to the customer&amp;#39;s ability to pay?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Especially when we can quite easily be talking about tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of dollars.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why must we get a loan before buying a car or a home?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why not drive off or move in and tell the provider &amp;quot;sue me&amp;quot;.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:52:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Is Medical Care Unnecessarily Expensive?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/why_is_medical_care_unnecessarily_expensive/#comment-13642739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see the enemy of common sense has arrived.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:55:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Is Medical Care Unnecessarily Expensive?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/why_is_medical_care_unnecessarily_expensive/#comment-13642749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Do YOU allow her in for treatment or do you turn her away?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;That should be made by the doctor, not the government.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:59:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Is Medical Care Unnecessarily Expensive?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/why_is_medical_care_unnecessarily_expensive/#comment-13642751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I forgot the word *choice* between That and should.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:01:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Is Medical Care Unnecessarily Expensive?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/why_is_medical_care_unnecessarily_expensive/#comment-13642752</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Upon finishing the article one thinks the obvious solution is to limit what everyone can order off the menu.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Restaurants do that by having people pay their own bill, or the person goes to the soup kitchen down the street and gets some voluntary charity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The whole concept of involuntary charity needs to be banished.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:06:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Is Medical Care Unnecessarily Expensive?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/why_is_medical_care_unnecessarily_expensive/#comment-13642758</link><description>&lt;p&gt;muirgeo,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&amp;#39;d like you to tell me what constitutes a &amp;quot;basic need&amp;quot;, and which ones should be provided by the government.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You obviously think that the services of medical professionals is a &amp;quot;basic need&amp;quot;.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Should internet be provided by the government?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After all, information betters peoples&amp;#39; lives.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What about cell phones?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Isn&amp;#39;t the ability to communicate a &amp;quot;basic need&amp;quot;.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A life without entertainment can drive people crazy, so shouldn&amp;#39;t everyone receive government funded movie passes every month?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:39:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Is Medical Care Unnecessarily Expensive?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/why_is_medical_care_unnecessarily_expensive/#comment-13642762</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#39;s assume the restaurant has private booths and food is brought to the table covered.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;There, nobody sees what anyone else orders.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No chance of embarrassment.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does that help?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:12:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Is Medical Care Unnecessarily Expensive?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/why_is_medical_care_unnecessarily_expensive/#comment-13642770</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Private charity- I think of Catholic Charities here in my hometown- adequately cover all poor people.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;CC gets a good portion of its funding from the government, at least according to my wife who happens to work for them (assuming your hometown starts with a L and ends with an N).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:09:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hocus-Pocus Indeed</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/hocus_pocus_indeed/#comment-13642820</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Our highly evolved brain is a thing, in fact the pinnacle, of emergent order.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;We&amp;#39;re three steps out of the cave with a bunch of toys.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyone who believes that as a species we&amp;#39;ve evolved beyond evil is naive, arrogant, or stupid.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Through accumulating knowledge we have eliminated the need to rediscover many things, by making tools with tools we&amp;#39;ve increased our ability to create complex machines, but the minds who use them are just as barbaric as the minds who have slaughters millions and millions of people over the ages.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 10:42:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hocus-Pocus Indeed</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/hocus_pocus_indeed/#comment-13642821</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to know who was the arrogant ass who started this &amp;quot;evolved into a higher state of being&amp;quot; crap.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&amp;#39;s like a religion, with them at the center.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Humanism perhaps?  I don&amp;#39;t know but it&amp;#39;s dangerous.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Every bit of history I&amp;#39;ve seen where power is accumulated and centralized has ended in disaster.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It always starts with an aura of infallibility, and ends in death.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hate to pull a Godwin here, but this president of ours sure reminds me of certain charismatic leaders who started off quite popular and ended up doing some very evil things.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 10:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Costs Are Not Benefits</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/costs_are_not_benefits/#comment-13642992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not economist, but I know a thing or two about software.  One thing I know for sure is that computer programs do what the programmer tells them to do, and computer programmers do what their customer tells them to do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the customer wants computer models that will predict the end of the world, that&amp;#39;s what they get.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#39;ve got an end of the world prediction of the future, an evil enemy called fossil fuels, a salvation in the form of technology that hasn&amp;#39;t been invented yet, and the solution requires extreme international government intervention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anthropogenic Global Warming is a doomsday cult.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 04:03:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Costs Are Not Benefits</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/costs_are_not_benefits/#comment-13642994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Oracle has spoken.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have looked into the Oracle and seen the end.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we do not cease burning the oil and coal provided by those evil rich men, then we will perish in the fire.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everyone must change their ways, and if that means force then it means force.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Only one higher power can apply the necessary force, and that higher power is government.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Technology can fix this, technology that doesn&amp;#39;t exist yet, but government can invent it.  Government can do anything.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It will cost money for government to invent this technology, but that can be solved through punishing deniers with punitive taxes.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Only government can save us from ourselves.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have seen in with my own eyes.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Oracle has spoken.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 04:31:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hayek on the Totalitarian Surprise</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/hayek_on_the_totalitarian_surprise/#comment-13643411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the people want a totalitarian state.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;We&amp;#39;ve become a nation of children in adult bodies looking to government to be our parent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 03:19:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Manny being Barry</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/manny_being_barry/#comment-13643504</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Should musicians who used illegal drugs be banned from the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Heck, I can&amp;#39;t think of anyone off the top of my head who&amp;#39;s music didn&amp;#39;t stink once they quit drugs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 04:14:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Canada&amp;#039;s Health-Care System</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/on_canada039s_health_care_system/#comment-13643629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can see it now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Single payer system will cure obesity, diabetes, alcoholism, lung cancer, heart disease and all other preventable conditions.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Easy, make it a crime to go against doctor&amp;#39;s orders.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Doctor says to get more exercise and change your diet, and you don&amp;#39;t do it, you get punished.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Doctor says quit smoking and drinking, you don&amp;#39;t do it you get forced rehab.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;All preventable illnesses will be cured!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 04:31:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Canada&amp;#039;s Health-Care System</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/on_canada039s_health_care_system/#comment-13643632</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ackermann,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In England there are government employees going door to door peeking in peoples&amp;#39; fridges and making sure they make proper use of leftovers.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Japan employers are fined when their employees&amp;#39; waistlines exceed certain predefined limits.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is precedence.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 05:44:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Resistance Futile?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/is_resistance_futile/#comment-13643683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Federal money is like heroin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 07:16:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Resistance Futile?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/is_resistance_futile/#comment-13643688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Savage is right.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:06:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Resistance Futile?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/is_resistance_futile/#comment-13643693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The bailout is not among the enumerated powers granted to the government in the US Constitution.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;You mean to say that if a power is not specifically given to the government by the Constitution that it belongs to the States or the People?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Come on!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anything goes as long as it is not specifically forbidden by the Constitution.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;And even if actions by the federal government are blatantly un-Constitutional, nobody has legal footing to challenge those actions in court.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;So it&amp;#39;s anything goes!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:19:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Resistance Futile?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/is_resistance_futile/#comment-13643698</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The interstate commerce clause was to prevent states from setting up tariffs between one another.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However it has been interpreted to mean everything and anything that might possibly cross a state border is subject to federal regulations.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just like &amp;quot;provide for the General Welfare&amp;quot; has been interpreted to mean providing everything from food to housing to medical care to, well, anything.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tenth Amendment be damned!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:43:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Resistance Futile?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/is_resistance_futile/#comment-13643700</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;So you&amp;#39;re defying Sir Winston, and telling me that at 20 you were a conservative/libertarian because you had a brain; and, now at 40 you&amp;#39;ve become a socialist because you found your heart?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Found his heart or lower testosterone levels?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:47:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Resistance Futile?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/is_resistance_futile/#comment-13643707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Constitutional Law seems to be based upon precedent, not the Constitution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So all preceding interpretations are right, fair and just.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Judges do not make mistakes.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is patently impossible that a preceding decision overstepped the constraints of the Constitution because the government does not make mistakes.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry, I forgot the sarcasm filter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If General Welfare and the Commerce Clause were to mean anything and everything, then why the 10th Amendment?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the founders intended a totalitarian state why didn&amp;#39;t they just say so?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 10:11:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Resistance Futile?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/is_resistance_futile/#comment-13643711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Should we debate what those clauses mean? Sure we should.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;What&amp;#39;s the point?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&amp;#39;ll say the clauses were limitations, you&amp;#39;ll say they were broad generalities.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&amp;#39;ll tell me I have no idea what they meant, then tell me what they meant.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the end the interpretation that gives the government the most power becomes the accepted one, because once the government has taken power it does not relinquish it willingly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 10:29:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Awkward</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/awkward/#comment-13643954</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Markets are more powerful than governments.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is why prohibition doesn&amp;#39;t work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Governments can only react, they cannot prevent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;They try, but always fail.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 09:33:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Government Is Anti-Trustworthy</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/government_is_anti_trustworthy/#comment-13644030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;TrUmPiT,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google &amp;#39;risc&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;cisc&amp;#39;.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That should answer some of your questions.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 04:46:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Administration&amp;#039;s Sixth Sense</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/the_administration039s_sixth_sense/#comment-13644048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;http://www.nikkicraft.com/images/iseestupidpeople.jpg&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:24:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How the world really works</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/how_the_world_really_works/#comment-13644232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Once the government has access to electronically stored medical records it will find new and interesting ways to use them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since the government will soon be paying everyone&amp;#39;s health care bill, it will soon need to cut that bill down by reducing the costs associated with preventable diseases.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mandatory physicals will give data necessary to mail out orders to change diet, get more exercise, drop a bad habit, or otherwise get healthier.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They might even get back into the business of deciding what sexual practices are acceptable, for health reasons.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Think I&amp;#39;m crazy?  In the UK there are government employees inspecting people&amp;#39;s refrigerators, and the Japanese government is fining employers if their employees&amp;#39; waistlines are too big.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are people who will not be satisfied until they tell us when to wake up, what to eat, where to work, when to exercise, with whom to have sex and in what position.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Once they administer our &amp;quot;health&amp;quot; they will be able to control every aspect of our lives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Electronic records are a critical step towards that goal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 03:59:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spending Other People&amp;#039;s Money Is Inherently Corrupting</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/spending_other_people039s_money_is_inherently_corrupting/#comment-13644304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;muirgeo,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Changing the numbers in a regulation is not deregulation.  It is modified regulation.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Deregulation is the removal of regulations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The financial market was not deregulated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The regulations were modified, not removed.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;So the problems were not a result of deregulation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 06:33:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On the Importance of the Extent of the Market</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/on_the_importance_of_the_extent_of_the_market/#comment-13644399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Liberalism is not only wrong, it&amp;#39;s a Humanistic religion where a government of men takes on the attributes of a god.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:19:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The deficit</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/the_deficit/#comment-13644433</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Sure! Also about $800 billion of the current debt is DIRECTLY from obligations of the just departed administration.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s like saying &amp;quot;But Mommy! He did it first!&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m starting to think that for muirgeo to understand individualism is for me to understand collectivism.  I can&amp;#39;t do it.  For the life of me I just can&amp;#39;t understand group-think.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I think that&amp;#39;s why libertarian ideals do so poorly in modern politics.  We&amp;#39;re individuals and we like it that way.  But politics requires organization to be effective.  So we get run over by the better organized group-think people by virtue of being individualists.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;It sucks.  I&amp;#39;m not sure what the solution might be.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:39:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can You Spot the Billionaire?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/can_you_spot_the_billionaire/#comment-13644627</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My guess is Nora is among those who believe there is a static amount of wealth out there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For someone to be rich, they must have made a bunch of people poor.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What do they call it?  Zero-sum game?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So when Nora sees a rich person, in her mind she sees a thief, someone who has attained their position on the backs of poor people.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&amp;#39;m not even sure these people can be reasoned with, because they themselves are not reasonable.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:13:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Touting Failure</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/touting_failure/#comment-13644670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ever notice that when the government touts solar power it is always in the form of a power plant?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can&amp;#39;t recall anyone in government promoting the use of solar panels for home use, either photovoltaic or heating water.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is it because power plants produce taxable energy and home use does not?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or perhaps because large scale solar energy production perpetuates the regulated monopoly while a smart grid would not?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:44:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Touting Failure</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/touting_failure/#comment-13644673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Yes - CLEARLY the $100 million dollar investment was a crafty attempt to raise more tax revenue. Brilliant!&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I didn&amp;#39;t mean this one.  There are other attempts to build solar power plants across the country producing energy for domestic, not military, consumption.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:01:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Touting Failure</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/touting_failure/#comment-13644674</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Aren&amp;#39;t they offering rebates for home installation of solar panels?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even with rebates the panels need to be replaced before they pay for themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Heck, in my state some guy placed panels all over his yard and the neighbors sued him saying the setup was ugly and lowering their property values.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe they won.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:02:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Huh?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/huh/#comment-13644789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder what would happen if Republicans started advocating for equal protection under the law for gay couples, in the form of an equivalent contract, while keeping the definition of marriage as a man and a woman.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The insistence by the gay community that those who oppose the redefinition of marriage are motivated by hate is a straw man, I just wish someone would hurry up and knock it down.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:58:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Man of System</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/no_man_of_system/#comment-13645011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In a recent conversation with someone on the subject of central planning, the response to my assertion that some things are just to complicated to plan was that a system being too complex for a simple-minded libertarian (me) to understand doesn&amp;#39;t mean some enlightened liberal (Krugman/Geithner) isn&amp;#39;t up to the task.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The arrogance was astounding.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:09:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The more the better, right?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/the_more_the_better_right/#comment-13645041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;“Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.” -- Mark Twain&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hamstringing the Dominant Firm</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/hamstringing_the_dominant_firm/#comment-13645123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When I hear the talking heads on the radio trashing Obummer and talking up Reagan, all I can do is scratch my head.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These people refer to Reagan as a fiscal conservative, yet wasn&amp;#39;t he a classic Keynesian?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The guy borrowed and spent like a madman, and now the pundits are trashing Obummer for doing the same thing.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&amp;#39;t get it.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean, if Reagan was so wonderful, shouldn&amp;#39;t I be paying my mortgage with a credit card?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:15:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#039;s working</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/what039s_working/#comment-13645186</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Recession is when your neighbor loses his job.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Depression is when you lose your job.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Recovery is when Obama loses his job.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:43:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#039;s working</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/what039s_working/#comment-13645192</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Clinton handed off a surplus, and the surplus should have gone toward paying down the debt.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clinton robbed Social Security replacing the &amp;quot;Trust&amp;quot; Fund with IOUs, and called the budget balanced.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Intergovernmental debt is still debt.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:08:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#039;s working</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/what039s_working/#comment-13645193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Poor people don&amp;#39;t save, they spend. If they saved, they wouldn&amp;#39;t be called poor.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;You don&amp;#39;t get rich by spending all your money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:10:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inspiring &amp;#8211; Not</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/inspiring_8211_not/#comment-13645273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The opposite of disingenuous is honest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The question implies that at one point the Clintons were not being disingenuous, which is the equivalent of calling them honest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;A Clinton being honest?  That&amp;#39;s a joke, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:38:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Keynes on Inflation</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/keynes_on_inflation/#comment-13645346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Even a broken clock is right twice a day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:49:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inspiring &amp;#8211; Not</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/inspiring_8211_not/#comment-13645275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Does it introduce too much cognitive dissonance to you to consider the possibility that sometimes the Clintons act honestly and sometimes that act disingenuously?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Every action by the Clintons is calculated for personal gain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If one of those actions is honest, it happens by pure coincidence.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is a man who never cheats on his wife through lack of opportunity a moral person?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is a politician being honest because at that moment it benefits their career a person of integrity?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:21:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where orders emerge</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/where_orders_emerge/#comment-13645531</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that some conscious effort to discuss the posts, as opposed to certain individuals&amp;#39; reactions to the posts, would go a long way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps some self policing and restraint could save the owners some headache and cash.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:52:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where orders emerge</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/where_orders_emerge/#comment-13645539</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Supply and demand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The trolls supply their B.S. only because people respond to it.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If nobody responded to them they would get bored and go away, right?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:02:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where orders emerge</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/where_orders_emerge/#comment-13645544</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ignore him and he&amp;#39;ll go away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ignore him and he&amp;#39;ll go away.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ignore him and he&amp;#39;ll go away.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:42:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brilliance from Bryan</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/brilliance_from_bryan/#comment-13645589</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So immigration policy is justified by the existence of the welfare state, and in absence of the welfare state we could have open borders?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sounds a little to simplistic to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 08:33:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brilliance from Bryan</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/brilliance_from_bryan/#comment-13645590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So immigration policy is justified by the existence of the welfare state, and in absence of the welfare state we could have open borders?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sounds a little to simplistic to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 08:33:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Perils of Protectionism</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/perils_of_protectionism/#comment-13645634</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;If I refuse to buy Geico insurance, Warren Buffett is powerless against me.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;True, but your state government might frown upon your driving without insurance.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:32:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Perils of Protectionism</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/perils_of_protectionism/#comment-13645635</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem I have with Free Trade is that the Constitution (pre-14th that is) pretty much limited the federal government to using tariffs for revenue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would assume that that&amp;#39;s because the government ensures free passage of goods, and wants to get paid for it.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That seems fair to me.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Protectionism though, that&amp;#39;s a different ballgame.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:47:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Global Warming Cause the Air France Crash?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/did_global_warming_cause_the_air_france_crash/#comment-13645696</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anthropogenic Global Warming is nothing but a modern doomsday cult.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just wish they&amp;#39;d put on their Nikes and get it over with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the mean time there is no point in reasoning with them, just as there is no point in reasoning with any religion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:44:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Competition and Health Care</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/competition_and_health_care/#comment-13645809</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let me see if I&amp;#39;ve got this straight.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The goal is to eliminate employer provided health insurance so people can shop around for their own, and this ability to shop around will encourage competition and lower cost?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;But what if my employer stops providing insurance, but pockets what they were contributing to my insurance?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&amp;#39;ll be stuck paying ten grand a year (OK, maybe eight grand because of the competition) for insurance while my employer pockets the difference.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:08:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Competition and Health Care</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/competition_and_health_care/#comment-13645812</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Wouldn&amp;#39;t you go elsewhere if your employer tried to screw you like that?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Last Fall my employer dropped my stepson from the plan because we have him part time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I&amp;#39;m stuck shelling out three grand a year for a major medical policy because the kid&amp;#39;s father is a jackass.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&amp;#39;m not in a position to go find another job, especially in this market.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they stopped offering insurance altogether I would certainly look for another employer, but that doesn&amp;#39;t mean I&amp;#39;d fine one.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:32:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drugs Won the War</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/drugs_won_the_war/#comment-13645915</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The government cannot stop the market, which is why prohibition does not work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I was in high school it was easier to get illegal drugs than legal alcohol.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now that the FDA has the power to regulate tobacco, I&amp;#39;ll bet that certain banned products will soon surface on the black market.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;How ironic is that?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In their efforts to keep kids from trying nicotine, they will make it more readily available to kids!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:35:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Sport Has Many Players</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/the_sport_has_many_players/#comment-13645970</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Saul, &lt;a href="http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/lemmings.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;Lemming suicide is a myth.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:52:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drugs Won the War</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/drugs_won_the_war/#comment-13645931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;http://www.paulbirch.net/AnalysisOfTheDrugProblem.html&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The guy states that drugs are dangerous, admits that there is no proof that marijuana is dangerous, then says that it must be dangerous because drugs are dangerous.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;A little too much &amp;quot;begging the question&amp;quot; for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:30:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drugs Won the War</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/drugs_won_the_war/#comment-13645946</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gil,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you a farmer?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just wondering, because you are extremely talented at making straw men.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:46:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drugs Won the War</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/drugs_won_the_war/#comment-13645948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;It&amp;#39;s interesting that many of the pro-drug arguments...&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Who said they were pro-drug?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;The argument is that prohibition creates more problems than it solves.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:03:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where is the world&amp;#039;s smallest violin?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/where_is_the_world039s_smallest_violin/#comment-13646130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Meanwhile, the stockpile of used Japanese cars flood the rest of Asia.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many of the cars driven in Japan are not available here in the states - they aren&amp;#39;t considered safe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder how many of those safety regulations were put in place at the request of the domestic auto industry so as to stifle competition?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:51:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where is the world&amp;#039;s smallest violin?</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/where_is_the_world039s_smallest_violin/#comment-13646134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;My take is that international competition will prevent a run-up in the price of domestic cars&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Both Japan and Europe have all kinds of gas sipping vehicles available that cannot be legally sold in this country due to safety regulations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I&amp;#39;m wondering is how domestic companies will be able to produce gas sippers that comply.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&amp;#39;t think it can be done.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;So regulations will need to be relaxed, but that will allow the competition to sell their cars.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:04:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stupid Cult of Political Personality</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/stupid_cult_of_political_personality/#comment-13646170</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ5SVDYBNrY" rel="nofollow"&gt;Living Colour said it best&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:17:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stupid Cult of Political Personality</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/stupid_cult_of_political_personality/#comment-13646178</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;1. Please stop calling me disingenuous&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Disingenious Kuehn,&amp;quot;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;love it!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:14:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lying Hypocrites</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/lying_hypocrites/#comment-13646267</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought we were in a country where the governed and members of the government were held to the same standards.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then I woke up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:57:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Waging War on the &amp;#039;War on Drugs&amp;#039;</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/waging_war_on_the_039war_on_drugs039/#comment-13646407</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not pro-drug, but I am anti-prohibition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Prohibition creates more problems than it solves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;You get corruption on all levels of government, black markets, resources wasted on enforcement, lost tax revenue, clogged courts and jails ... yet supply and demand never seems to change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If supply and demand are not affected, what&amp;#39;s the point of prohibition?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is the point punishment?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If so it doesn&amp;#39;t seem to do much good.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe the point is deterrence?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It doesn&amp;#39;t seem to do much of that either.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe the point is to erode rights and confiscate property?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It does a bang up job at that!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:11:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Waging War on the &amp;#039;War on Drugs&amp;#039;</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/waging_war_on_the_039war_on_drugs039/#comment-13646408</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are several things that the Drug War does, and does very well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;It allow lawyers to get very wealthy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It allows those who invest in and run private prisons to get very wealthy.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It allows police departments to purchase all kinds of new toys by confiscating private property.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It allows politicos to snoop and interfere in private lives.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It allows black market thugs to get very wealthy.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It creates disincentives to go to college or get a trade when one can get wealthy by participating in the black market.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That is until they get caught, hire a lawyer, have their property confiscated, are put into prison, and stripped of their right to vote, hold a professional license or bear arms.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yup, the Drug War is very effective at many things.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Curbing the supply or demand of drugs is not one of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:22:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Waging War on the &amp;#039;War on Drugs&amp;#039;</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/waging_war_on_the_039war_on_drugs039/#comment-13646411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;I will care more what my neighbor ingests if I have to pay a part of his insurance costs (which I am already doing for his retirement).&amp;quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess we&amp;#39;d better ban excessive salt, refined sugar, animal fats, red meat, alcohol, tobacco, dairy, processed food, fast food...&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:45:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unfairness &amp;#8212; and Anti-Freedom &amp;#8212; Doctrine</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/unfairness_8212_and_anti_freedom_8212_doctrine/#comment-13646419</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Alex,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are two knobs on the radio.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One changes the station, the other turns it off.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you don&amp;#39;t like what you hear I&amp;#39;ve got some advice for you.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Go play with your knobs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:22:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unfairness &amp;#8212; and Anti-Freedom &amp;#8212; Doctrine</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/unfairness_8212_and_anti_freedom_8212_doctrine/#comment-13646424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alex,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you can&amp;#39;t tell the difference between news and opinion on Fox, you&amp;#39;ve got a SERIOUS problem.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;But that&amp;#39;s not it.  That&amp;#39;s not it at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;You want them silenced because they ask questions about things that you do not want to have questioned.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:49:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unfairness &amp;#8212; and Anti-Freedom &amp;#8212; Doctrine</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/unfairness_8212_and_anti_freedom_8212_doctrine/#comment-13646429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;My advice: watch C-SPAN.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Works better than melatonin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:15:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unintendend Consequences</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/unintendend_consequences/#comment-13646494</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Illegal immigration is a symptom of the welfare state.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The government handing out checks to people lowers the supply of labor.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Illegal immigrants fill the vacuum. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:58:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friedman on Health Care</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/friedman_on_health_care/#comment-13646538</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Is the moral of the story that people have to take a leap of faith?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;No Gil, the moral of the story is that when government policy creates a problem, that more government is NOT the answer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not that I would expect you to understand.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:27:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unintendend Consequences</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/unintendend_consequences/#comment-13646497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The statement &amp;quot;illegal immigrants do the work Americans are unwilling to do&amp;quot; is wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A truer statement would be &amp;quot;illegal immigrants do the work that Americans ON WELFARE are TOO PROUD to do&amp;quot;.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Same old song and dance.  Government creates a problem, and the solution involves more government.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;What do they say about doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:34:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unintendend Consequences</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/unintendend_consequences/#comment-13646499</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Legal immigration should be expanded so that illegal immigration is less attractive. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;How will that help?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People come here illegally because they know that there is work.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Once upon a time Americans used to clean toilets, pick lettuce, and work in egg farms and slaughter houses.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now Americans can afford to turn their nose to such work, while getting a check from the government.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Illegal immigration is an unintended consequence of the welfare state.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Expanding legal immigration won&amp;#39;t help, because the people who come here legally do not come here to clean toilets and pick lettuce.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:54:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friedman on Health Care</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/friedman_on_health_care/#comment-13646540</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Healthcare: Moral Equivalent of Slavery?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do you mean the idea of healthcare being a basic right as equivalent to being entitled to the labor of others?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:09:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unfairness &amp;#8212; and Anti-Freedom &amp;#8212; Doctrine</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/unfairness_8212_and_anti_freedom_8212_doctrine/#comment-13646457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Please, please, please stop calling me disingenuous&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Then quit being disingenuous!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:22:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unfairness &amp;#8212; and Anti-Freedom &amp;#8212; Doctrine</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/unfairness_8212_and_anti_freedom_8212_doctrine/#comment-13646459</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No Dan, you seem to be the one who is confused.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;You will say that you agree with something, then explain how you are against it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or you will say you disagree with something, then proceed to defend it.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Disingenuous - not straightforward or candid; giving a false appearance of frankness.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you want vid to stop calling you Disingenuous Kuehn, then stop being disingenuous.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:42:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unfairness &amp;#8212; and Anti-Freedom &amp;#8212; Doctrine</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/unfairness_8212_and_anti_freedom_8212_doctrine/#comment-13646461</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Perhaps I am confused.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes you are.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Maybe you can explain it to me.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&amp;#39;d rather watch you make a fool of yourself.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&amp;#39;s quite entertaining, especially because you haven&amp;#39;t a clue.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:56:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friedman on Health Care</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/friedman_on_health_care/#comment-13646552</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gil,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&amp;#39;m sorry, I misunderstood.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&amp;#39;t think the dvd analogy works well because I don&amp;#39;t think economy of scale applies to health care.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or maybe it does and someone can enlighten me.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:50:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friedman on Health Care</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/friedman_on_health_care/#comment-13646557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;David,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I got all that.  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In fact I get it better than some because I have employer provided insurance for myself and my wife, but they will not cover my stepson.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So for him I purchase catastrophic insurance (because his father is an irresponsible jerk) and pay for normal stuff out of pocket.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was trying to figure out Gil&amp;#39;s point about dvds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:04:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friedman on Health Care</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/friedman_on_health_care/#comment-13646529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I wouldn&amp;#39;t support a single-payer system that eliminates all market forces deciding those tradeoffs - but ... &amp;quot;maybe making the cost/wait time trade off is worth considering&amp;quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;You wouldn&amp;#39;t support X but X is worth considering...?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:50:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friedman on Health Care</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/friedman_on_health_care/#comment-13646535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;John, I guessed that you have some interest in keeping the status quo.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not really.  The status quo means my employer pays for a portion of my insurance, but won&amp;#39;t allow me to cover my stepson.  So I have a separate policy for him.  The policy I have for myself and my wife is very expensive thanks to state regulations.  I am not allowed to purchase insurance outside this state because Nanny tells me it&amp;#39;s bad.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&amp;#39;d be more than happy to take the money that my employer contributes to my plan and choose how to spend it myself.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But alas the tax structure makes that highly unlikely.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;All these obstacles created by government, all these choices made for my by government, all these problems created by government, and it seems the only solution that we will see involves more government.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s enough to drive a person insane!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:18:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WOW: Twitter to Raise $100 Million in New Funding</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/wow_twitter_to_raise_100_million_in_new_funding/#comment-17297929</link><description>I agree   - hype does a lot for a company</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:16:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fontes' Rants</title><link>http://legendarycomics.disqus.com/fontes_rants_214/#comment-17146596</link><description>Meh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AVGN wannabe. Also, start rating about yourself. Also, why isn't Sword of Heavens Akashi with the same quality? Make a rant about that... Or make a rant about how your rant's end with you punching, giving a shotgun, or violently "resolving" things. You know... A clever solution. For once.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:30:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fontes' Rants</title><link>http://legendarycomics.disqus.com/fontes_rants_214/#comment-17146621</link><description>Meh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AVGN wannabe. Also, start rating about yourself. Also, why isn't Sword of Heavens Akashi with the same quality? Make a rant about that... Or make a rant about how your rant's end with you punching, giving a shotgun, or violently "resolving" things. You know... A clever solution. For once.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:30:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Cyclists Pay Road Taxes?</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/should_cyclists_pay_road_taxes/#comment-17188932</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"if there were not bicycles we wouldn’t need bicycle lanes.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;is just as true as saying - if there were not cars we wouldn’t need bicycle lanes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:14:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Cyclists Pay Road Taxes?</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/should_cyclists_pay_road_taxes/#comment-17611248</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"if there were not bicycles we wouldn’t need bicycle lanes.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;is just as true as saying - if there were not cars we wouldn’t need bicycle lanes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:14:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Modernista! Parts Ways with Cadillac - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://agencyspy.disqus.com/modernista_parts_ways_with_cadillac_mediabistrocom_agencyspy/#comment-19847623</link><description>Since when does it take "balls" to get fired?  Read between the lines; they were dumped with no invitation to defend.  Every agency wants to be connected with a brand turn around.  Are you new?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:51:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.dealcatcher.com/peripherals/logitech-webcam-pro-9000-web-camera</title><link>http://dealcatcher.disqus.com/thread_15674/#comment-19907140</link><description>The website is showing MSRP at $99, not $79 so $30 off $99.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:25:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using iPhone 3G S Voice Control Commands</title><link>http://tech-recipes.disqus.com/using_iphone_3g_s_voice_control_commands/#comment-20210034</link><description>I had the exact same problem... I think it's a faulty switch in the headset.  I just got mine replaced and hope the problem will go away.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TC</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:10:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>