<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Neil</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/bb16d6f070d09976ecb031d17c276968/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:08:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: &amp;raquo; Your Facebook app is a disaster, and I was right.  |  StartupNorth</title><link>http://socialwrite.disqus.com/raquo_your_facebook_app_is_a_disaster_and_i_was_right_startupnorth/#comment-1631034</link><description>Although I'm a proponent of the long-term possibilities of Facebook Applications, I love this article.  I think a lot needs to be demystified before any real progress can be made.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Specifically, you mentioned the social graph.  Once Facebook cleans up the application directory (which it seems like they're going to with the next generation of tabbed user profiles), we're going to see far fewer popular applications.  I imagine this will lead to a few applications becoming as indispensable as say, Photos or Video.  Then we'll see a golden application and hopefully something other than "How many vampires kissed my top friends".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:53:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Four Things Not To Do When Pitching Sexy Widget</title><link>http://sexywidget.disqus.com/four_things_not_to_do_when_pitching_sexy_widget/#comment-355395</link><description>How about explaining to you seven reasons why Live Messenger sucks?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Shameless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.facebookinsight.com/2008/04/19/dear-microsoft-7-reasons-why-windows-live-messenger-is-starting-to-suck/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.facebookinsight.com/2008/04/19/dear-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:00:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: View Your Twitter Reach With Quotably</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/view_your_twitter_reach_with_quotably/#comment-1574317</link><description>That's great stuff.  I find friends that dive in and have no idea what's going on in their friends' profiles.  Off the top of my head, this could be used to collect statistics on conversation-generators on the web.  Right now we have blogs, but through Twitter we get a little closer to the people, and see who really generates a forum in their everyday, off-the-cuff observations.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:16:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Launches API, Can They Take on Facebook?</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/friendfeed_launches_api_can_they_take_on_facebook/#comment-1574340</link><description>This is definitely something to watch as it grows.  If FriendFeed introduces a usable friend-list and messaging service, then it will be able to attract a large market.  If they then theoretically tie in with Orkut or somehow get a photo application running, it will be an open version of Facebook.  Instead of applications, people will just create websites based on the FriendFeed API.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still a long way to go, but FF is moving at such a rapid pace that everyone should keep an eye open for them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:16:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Brings Out the Truth in You</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/social_media_brings_out_the_truth_in_you/#comment-1574346</link><description>Intense, such a great truth.  Our culture very much promotes a 'good' way of being, which is incredible in itself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, don't be surprised if we start to see social networks dedicated to being 'bad'.  Ever heard of AshleyMadison.com?  Maybe not quite the same, but definitely along those lines.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:00:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Gaming Goes on a Tear</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/social_gaming_goes_on_a_tear/#comment-1574392</link><description>Does that SGN Traffic chart include the traffic from affiliate games like Jetman?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:17:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mark Pincus - CEO, Zynga</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/mark_pincus_ceo_zynga/#comment-1574500</link><description>Great interview, great visionary.  I had the pleasure of having a thirty minute chat with Mark a few weeks ago, and was really enamored with his "open fields" view of game design.  "Infinite space" was another term he threw around.  Very cool!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:47:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Times Updates</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/social_times_updates/#comment-1574506</link><description>Great idea.  Good luck with it, we'll do what we can up North.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:59:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Blogging and Social Media Be Mainstream?</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/will_blogging_and_social_media_be_mainstream/#comment-2832958</link><description>Voracious appetite for researched and intellectual information = not mainstream.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:08:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your Facebook app is a disaster, and I was right.</title><link>http://startupnorth.disqus.com/your_facebook_app_is_a_disaster_and_i_was_right/#comment-1631703</link><description>Although I'm a proponent of the long-term possibilities of Facebook Applications, I love this article.  I think a lot needs to be demystified before any real progress can be made.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Specifically, you mentioned the social graph.  Once Facebook cleans up the application directory (which it seems like they're going to with the next generation of tabbed user profiles), we're going to see far fewer popular applications.  I imagine this will lead to a few applications becoming as indispensable as say, Photos or Video.  Then we'll see a golden application and hopefully something other than "How many vampires kissed my top friends".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:53:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Interview With Mark Zuckerberg</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/my_interview_with_mark_zuckerberg/#comment-1639705</link><description>Great work Nick.  I like the hard-hitting, and I'm sure your knowledge went through.  Virality, messaging and the future of the social web.  Thanks for another source of great insight into the future of this market.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:24:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CBS Sports Granted 100 Invites Per Day</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/cbs_sports_granted_100_invites_per_day/#comment-1639771</link><description>What did anybody expect?  The company is still trying to secure funding, and although I'll probably get whacked on the head for this, I think that having a few Applications that truly demonstrate the community potential will be good for all Application Developers in the long run.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean, invites alone aren't enough to seal the deal.  If you want to take on the big boys at CBS, come up with a better idea, a better marketing scheme, and face the music: the social web isn't going to be fair for a while.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe until Google's "do no evil" mantra comes into play, and OpenSocial/FriendFeed rules the web.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:30:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Facebook Doomed?</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/is_facebook_doomed/#comment-1639777</link><description>I think that they're gearing up to 'relaunch' their whole service.  Rolling out the new profiles may seem like a small technical change to us, but from the perspective of the users (and combined with the right marketing), it will be an opportunity for Facebook to reinvent itself.  Combine that with the great buzz they still have, and the 60,000,000 and growing user-base, and I would say calling them 'doomed' is just unfounded sensationalism.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:26:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Needs a Faster Newsfeed</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_needs_a_faster_newsfeed/#comment-1639796</link><description>You sure have changed your tone about the possible benefits of FriendFeed!  lol.  In seriousness though, the next iteration of profiles allows user to 'approve' what appears in their feed, so I imagine that the ones that ARE approved will have a higher 'value' in the algorithm, and we'll start seeing more entries about what people WANT to show off to their friends.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which is good.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:28:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Walks Fine Line With App Developers</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_walks_fine_line_with_app_developers/#comment-1639828</link><description>I am not sure if the profile revamp is a deliberate play by Facebook to attack their own developers, as much as a response to the cry of users.  Profiles have grown out of control, and I think that their first priority is preventing the "MySpace"-ing of Facebook.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for IM, it's just too sweet a service to hold back on.  It's a fine line, but it's the same fine line as Walmart busting into a small community.  The mom &amp;amp; pops / app devs need to become creative to compete.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:10:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook and CareerBuilder Partner Up</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_and_careerbuilder_partner_up/#comment-1639834</link><description>If they had a special application devoted to people uploading their resume, CareerBuilder would have access to some of the user's personal information (well, as much as the Application API releases).  Perhaps they plan on using that information to give recruiters a little 'extra info' at a price.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:38:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A New Facebook Ad Network For Everybody</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/a_new_facebook_ad_network_for_everybody/#comment-1639837</link><description>This is genius... I was disappointed in you, jealous of you, and amazed at the same time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:01:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Carpooler Video</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_carpooler_video/#comment-1639808</link><description>This really gives a face to what the public sees as a series of bothersome invitations and tech-speak.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This open environment gives us a voice!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:30:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do You Have a Big Brain?</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/do_you_have_a_big_brain/#comment-2288958</link><description>William, I just got that same message myself!  13,647,15cm³.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:56:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook viral marketing: When and why do apps &amp;#8220;jump the shark?&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://futuristicplay2.disqus.com/facebook_viral_marketing_when_and_why_do_apps_8220jump_the_shark8221/#comment-1843606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clearly you've mapped the short lifecycle of most Facebook applications at this point.  This kind of theory would hold for any sort of engaging application online.  The anomalies do exist though, like Top Friends or Compare People, where constant innovation keeps users coming back for more.  I imagine this is what we'll see after Facebook shakes down existing applications with the new Profile setup.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:02:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>