<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for barca1</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/barca1/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/barca1/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:16:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Homeless on the Home Front by Charles Simic | NYRblog | The New York Review of Books</title><link>http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2009/nov/23/homeless-on-the-home-front/#comment-24070683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't see any abuse here, Kate - just confronting  a con artist.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">barca1</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:16:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Progressive - Hillary Still Throwing Knives at Barack</title><link>http://www.progressive.org/node/6448#comment-510562</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When the primaries are over, Senator Clinton will concede, period.  i simply can't believe she wants to destroy the party's chances of winning in the general election - she must do the right thing in conceding to the winner and supporting the Democratic nominee in the race to the White House.  And the DNC will let her know that this is the only just and sane course to follow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">barca1</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:35:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Obama Won’t Take Hillary | Drupal</title><link>http://www.progressive.org/?q=mag_wx050808#comment-451597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree completely, Hillary's negatives would bring out the Republicans in a big way.  I have always thought, since the beginning, that the Clinton baggage would sink the candidacy, period.  The movement of energized voters that the Obama campaign has organized will bring a Democrat into the white house and the Dem. party into the 21st century&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">barca1</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:07:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Is Hillary Fighting For? | The Progressive</title><link>http://www.progressive.org/mag_rc042308#comment-371154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"mean" and "tough"?  I wouldn't define lying, pandering and republican-style fear-mongering as "mean and tough".  It smacks of desperation.  We need a real leader and we've got one - Barack Obama.   It has been sad to watch Sen. Clinton come down to this level, but it will soon enough come to an end and we can get on with the real work of putting our democrat into office.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">barca1</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:27:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hillary Clinton’s Pennsylvania Victory | The Progressive</title><link>http://progressive.org/mag_wx042308#comment-371121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Obama is a fighter, but he does it without pandering, fear-mongering and lying, which is why he is winning now and will win the general election.  The majority of Americans are sick and tired of the same old politics, hence a frontrunner like Clinton is losing to the new guy.  and clearly, he doesn't want to antagonize her supporters unnecesarirly - we'll need to unite when she drops out and he knows that.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">barca1</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:21:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>