DISQUS

DISQUS Hello!  The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.

Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.

Harry's picture

Unregistered

Feeds

aliases

  • Harry

Harry

9 months ago

in Evangelical leader smacks McCain for lack of ‘principle’ on The Colorado Independent
That is a great answer.

Why would a scientific person reject god right out? Look at what is beyond the universe. What happens before big bang? What caused it? Where did all these matter came from? Where is all this energy created from? Is there more then one universe? What about dimension?

You are looking at question that mankind might never be able to answer, in fact, no creature in the universe might be able to answer. We all come to this world and this universe unknowing and leave carrying a bit of mystery with us. There are simply a lot of things nobody know why, and probably nobody ever will.

Therefore, to explains science, you are going to need a little faith.
1 reply
Shepherd79 I think that one of the great misrepresentation of science is that it stands to reject "god" That of course is a fallacy. Science simply looks to explain mechanics of the natural world, through observation and experimentation.

The "god" debate is then not for a scientist to wage but rather a philosopher. However, the argument that god must exist because of what happened before the big bang? what caused it? that there must be a designer for this universe, is in fact false logic, in that the same question can be applied "god" If god created the universe who created god?

I reject the belief that to explain science you need faith. To explain science you need observation and logic. Religion requires neither.
Returning? Login