<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Graeme</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/b8bc08d73445bec100fbefe77c51eade/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:48:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Who Believes in Evolution?</title><link>http://oculture.disqus.com/who_believes_in_evolution/#comment-21002996</link><description>What is scary is that people are accepting Pew's flamebait statistics at face value.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The poll has been constructed (whether incompetently or deliberately I cannot tell) to give this result.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most Christian's believe in both evolution both a creator God and Darwinian evolution (not the official position of the Catholic Church, that).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Graeme</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:48:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Buyer&amp;#8217;s Guide To SEO</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/a_buyer8217s_guide_to_seo_20/#comment-368731</link><description>I have the same problem: I can see no way of telling how good an SEO is, and how effective they would be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even a track record of helping successful sites is not that good an indication, because you do not know how much of the success is attributable to the SEO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did use a well know SEO who runs a press release type service. As far as I can tell, the impact on the growth of my site was negative. Never again. I will do what I can do myself for SEO, and rely on high quality content to do the rest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Graeme</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:13:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Buyer&amp;#8217;s Guide To SEO</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/a_buyer8217s_guide_to_seo_20/#comment-368751</link><description>I have the same problem: I can see no way of telling how good an SEO is, and how effective they would be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even a track record of helping successful sites is not that good an indication, because you do not know how much of the success is attributable to the SEO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did use a well know SEO who runs a press release type service. As far as I can tell, the impact on the growth of my site was negative. Never again. I will do what I can do myself for SEO, and rely on high quality content to do the rest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Graeme</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:22:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Copyright Infringement != Theft | 20bits</title><link>http://20bits.disqus.com/copyright_infringement_theft_20bits/#comment-3793601</link><description>No expectations make copying morally equivalent to theft. At the most they make it morally equivalent to breaking the law mandating any other monopoly: e.g. by using Skype in a country where the government has granted a single carrier a monopoly on international phone calls.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Graeme</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:47:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>