<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Matt</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/b845a5bc7028b756e4124ef4eac7c5e4/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:32:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Breaking News From Macworld: Windows Mobile Team Commits Suicide</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/breaking_news_from_macworld_windows_mobile_team_commits_suicide/#comment-4353053</link><description>Well, I've just looked through the demos on the Apple site. They are all pretty much standard fare. The new interface for voicemail requires operator co-operation. You'd have thought Nokia could've pushed this through earlier -- it won't be long until all the handset manufacturers are doing something like it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The multitouch interface is fantastic. If the platform is suitably open, developers are going to do amazing things with it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The other, which tells me Apple 'gets' the phone interface like noone else, was the UI for assigning a photo as the background/desktop. You can zoom/centre a photo so that it focuses on what you want. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bingo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those things are going to sell like hotcakes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:50:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vista Security A Joke? : Executables Install As Administrator Because It&amp;#8217;s More Convenient</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/vista_security_a_joke_executables_install_as_administrator_because_it8217s_more_convenient/#comment-4353394</link><description>I'm not sure it's entirely correct to say 'by default' for OS X/Linux.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can, of course, install to /home/matt/bin if you want, but that requires extra parameters to make install, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And with OS X, you drag/drop (ah, bless the simplicity) to /Applications/. The 'niceness' of OS X is that you can drag/drop to /Users/Matt/Applications - or anywhere really - and run from there. Apps store their settings in /Users/Matt/Library *or*, for system wide settings, /Library.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No doubt OS X is *miles* ahead of Windows in this regard. I don't think there is anyway Windows will be able to force users, or perhaps more importantly, app developers, over to a OS X/*nix style of application deployment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:59:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Security: How Network Ports Work</title><link>http://danielrm26.disqus.com/security_how_network_ports_work/#comment-4353428</link><description>Yur&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The 'connection' between your web browser and the web server is between the port on your machine and the port on theirs. Typically connections *from* your machine will be made above port 1024, if not higher, *to* a server on a port below 1024.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, your web server listens on port 80, and your web browser 'listens' on a higher port, for the specific task of talking to the remote web server for one session.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope this makes a bit of sense.. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:32:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking News From Macworld: Windows Mobile Team Commits Suicide</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/breaking_news_from_macworld_windows_mobile_team_commits_suicide/#comment-11153386</link><description>Well, I've just looked through the demos on the Apple site. They are all pretty much standard fare. The new interface for voicemail requires operator co-operation. You'd have thought Nokia could've pushed this through earlier -- it won't be long until all the handset manufacturers are doing something like it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The multitouch interface is fantastic. If the platform is suitably open, developers are going to do amazing things with it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The other, which tells me Apple 'gets' the phone interface like noone else, was the UI for assigning a photo as the background/desktop. You can zoom/centre a photo so that it focuses on what you want. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bingo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those things are going to sell like hotcakes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:50:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vista Security A Joke? : Executables Install As Administrator Because It&amp;#8217;s More Convenient</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/vista_security_a_joke_executables_install_as_administrator_because_it8217s_more_convenient/#comment-11155489</link><description>I'm not sure it's entirely correct to say 'by default' for OS X/Linux.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can, of course, install to /home/matt/bin if you want, but that requires extra parameters to make install, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And with OS X, you drag/drop (ah, bless the simplicity) to /Applications/. The 'niceness' of OS X is that you can drag/drop to /Users/Matt/Applications - or anywhere really - and run from there. Apps store their settings in /Users/Matt/Library *or*, for system wide settings, /Library.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No doubt OS X is *miles* ahead of Windows in this regard. I don't think there is anyway Windows will be able to force users, or perhaps more importantly, app developers, over to a OS X/*nix style of application deployment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:59:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Security: How Network Ports Work</title><link>http://drm.disqus.com/security_how_network_ports_work/#comment-11155613</link><description>Yur&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The 'connection' between your web browser and the web server is between the port on your machine and the port on theirs. Typically connections *from* your machine will be made above port 1024, if not higher, *to* a server on a port below 1024.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, your web server listens on port 80, and your web browser 'listens' on a higher port, for the specific task of talking to the remote web server for one session.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope this makes a bit of sense.. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:32:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>