<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Kevin</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/b7de9caa90311879a81e0c6175616d1d/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:49:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Illegal BBC clips on Revver</title><link>http://neilmaclean.disqus.com/illegal_bbc_clips_on_revver/#comment-1210122</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.revver.com/video/11772/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.revver.com/video/11772/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've had about 30 videos pulled from Revver because I used copyrighted music. They are quite vigilent about this, but the reason is intriguing. It's not driven by legal protection. It's driven by an ethic of the company to reward creators not those using other people's stuff.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Revver, mind you, is well managed in this regard vs. Google and YouTube which have no processes in place. I'd guess that 50% of the content on those sites is stolen from other sites. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My blog has more on revver... &lt;a href="http://www.revverberation.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.revverberation.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:49:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>