<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Len K. Mar</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/b50c8a8eaacd12d7e491b7bb3d747162/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:33:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Stop the SolidWorks Rot: Simple Tips for Awesome Design Practices</title><link>http://solidsmack.disqus.com/stop_the_solidworks_rot_simple_tips_for_awesome_design_practices/#comment-1310747</link><description>My pet peeve with existing libraries is as follows:&lt;br&gt;After going through the selection process to get the right model I then have to manually enter information such as Description, Material, Vendor, Part Number, etc...&lt;br&gt;There is nothing more frustrating than having 10 identical hardware components all named something different.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why can't this selection information populate the configuration properties of the library model upon creation instead of the user's having to manually re-enter the same information used to select the part.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Len K. Mar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:04:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 3D PDF coming to SolidWorks!</title><link>http://rickyjordan.disqus.com/3d_pdf_coming_to_solidworks/#comment-1789543</link><description>The reason Adobe 2D became so popular was the low overhead (read file size) that allowed the use of low-end machines and small emailed file sizes. The file sizes of the new 3D version of Adobe are pretty darn big.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Len</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Len K. Mar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 08:00:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The &amp;#8220;S&amp;#8221; Key Experiment Part 1</title><link>http://rickyjordan.disqus.com/the_8220s8221_key_experiment_part_1/#comment-4210645</link><description>Nice job&lt;br&gt;Didn't know it was that easy to customize.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Len K. Mar</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:33:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SW2009: The Toolbox got a makeover!</title><link>http://gabijack.disqus.com/sw2009_the_toolbox_got_a_makeover/#comment-4802627</link><description>Hi,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've got two companies that are interested in SW but are shying away as they have to make their own aircraft fasteners.&lt;br&gt;Compared to commercial fasteners the AN/MS A/C fasteners should be easier to create in toolbox.&lt;br&gt;Maybe if enough people ask for the design tables it will become reality......</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Len K. Mar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:33:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>