<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Nardwilly</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/b1e8e18ba31ae1e4c8fe371561db8970/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:21:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The GOP&amp;#8217;s New Theme: Those Uppity Obamas</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/the_gop8217s_new_theme_those_uppity_obamas/#comment-841875</link><description>BigMan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We all are responsible for how others respond to our words.  If our use creates hurt for others we need to stop.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I watched my grandkids' hurt response to an old buzzard at my health club pool who called them "little niggers." I could have killed him."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This idea of white n----- I do not understand.  They are usually called white trash.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:16:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: And Another One</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/and_another_one/#comment-851651</link><description>He was speaking at a Black church.  There is a real problem in the Black community of fathers abandoning their children  Every one of my female cousins that are divorced have absentee fathers.  I am not unique in our community.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is an American problem, but the incidence in Black families is higher.  This is a fact we can only resolve by confronting.  Do not have a problem with the truth.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:57:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: And Another One</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/and_another_one/#comment-851700</link><description>He was at a Black church.  His father abandoned him.  He lived in a community of Blacks where some fathers abandoned children.  How could he not speak about it.  Most Black men that are taking care of their families talk about this problem. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do not understand why this issue is off limits to any, but avid racist.  All folks who want the Black community to thrive should bemoan the high incidence of father abandonment in the Black community.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:05:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Senator Obama, watch out for snakes.</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/dear_senator_obama_watch_out_for_snakes/#comment-876295</link><description>All CBC members that supported Hillary should not be considered 'snakes'.  I believe the New York delegation decision to support their Senator was absolutely appropriate.  She was their Senator.  She  had helped all of them raise money.  They worked with her on New York issues.  Obama had 100% support form the Democratic leaders in Illinois, even when the leaders did not support each other.  She deserved the same.  Also, Rangel was instrumental in getting her to quit when she did and how she did.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 16:42:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saturday Open Thread -Enjoy the weekend!</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/saturday_open_thread_enjoy_the_weekend/#comment-1012805</link><description>The results of the tracking polls are below.  Gallup and Rasmussen poll daily.  They combine the most recent three days as one result.&lt;br&gt;They survey 2700 to 3000 people over the three days.  The Gallup showed a 3 point spread three days ago.  The Rasmussen showed a 2 point lead four days ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama has led in the Gallup and Rasmussen since June.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gallup Daily: Obama Retains Lead, 48% to 41%&lt;br&gt;	&lt;a href="http://www.gallup.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.gallup.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rasmussen Daily Obama 49% McCain 43%&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.rasmussenreports.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: John McCain: Lying Sack Of Poo On What He&amp;#8217;s Done For Equality</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/john_mccain_lying_sack_of_poo_on_what_he8217s_done_for_equality/#comment-1087348</link><description>He stood up to Bob Jones University, but in SC in 2000 he supported the states right view on the confederate flag.  So he is OK with interracial dating but believes the confederate flag is worthy of a place of honor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So perhaps you don't even like the McCain of 2000.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:36:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Getting Hot in Here&amp;#8230;or at the Kilpatrick&amp;#8217;s Crib</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/it8217s_getting_hot_in_here8230or_at_the_kilpatrick8217s_crib_93/#comment-1229982</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080814/METRO/808140351" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AI...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The move in Detroit is measured and appropriate for followers of the Mayor.  I agree he needs to go, but the city needs to find a way for it to happen.  He will be gone soon.  Did it take too long? Yes, but I believe it will happen and hopefully the people of Detroit will have learned a lesson in choosing leaders.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:44:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tuesday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/tuesday_open_thread_57/#comment-1651158</link><description>I read the information from Kurtz.  It is explained as fact, the University of Illinois-Chicago (UIC) does not own the the records.  Some lower library officials gave permission to view the records based on the normal process for viewing any records of special collections.  The managers were notified by the donors a deed for the records had not been executed and in addition the records were not organized by the library.  Since the library did not own the records, it could not give permission for your boy to review them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way the records are not on the Obama -Ayers relationship, they are on a foundation they both served as board members.  They both stated this is the extent of any relationship.  Ayers is on the faculty of UIC.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The lack of organization means the library does not know what was in the records.  It is absolutely appropriate to prohibit access to uncatalogued documents.  The researcher could still or damage the records.  It is better to create images of the records and then allow access to who so ever.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:03:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Remember Lieberman vs Lamont?</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/remember_lieberman_vs_lamont/#comment-1729358</link><description>Joe L. sincerely believes Israel can be extinguished.  He believes violence in the service of the chosen people is virtuous.  The Old Testament Bible teaches this lesson and others.  The New Testament Bible teaches a specialness based on belief not blood.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;His violence is OK to support Jews view was not obvious before Gore picked him.  His belief in his moral superiority was in full display as he condemned Bill Clinton for adultery.  He is also now in love with the idea of himself as non partisan wise man.  This combination convinces him he has not lied to the Democrats and he has not criticized Obama.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Add in a  little envy at Obama's success and his absolute failure as a Democrat and you get a bitter old man.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:22:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tuesday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/tuesday_open_thread_79/#comment-1855669</link><description>Mc Cain does not believe abortion should be left to the states, he believes the right to privacy (abortion) should be repealed by the Supreme Court.  Homosexual marriage issues are left to the states There is no federal law establishing homosexual marriages.  There are no federal court case establishing homosexual marriages.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Socially conservative judges have whims and are activist also.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do your values include cheating on your wife to marry a younger and richer woman?  Do your values include lieing about your opponent?  McCain policy call for individual purchase of health care. This will make insurance more expensive for most as the insurance company drop the ill.  In addition this would be a grand experiment because this type of system exist no where on earth.  Health care is a public good like streets, garbage pick up, and education.  It should be universal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He has offered no ideas to end wasteful spending.  The biggest waste is the war in Iraq.  He will continue to spend money on the military so he can be belligerent.  We need peace not war.  We need discussion not bluster.  His ideas are no ear marks, but he promotes earmarks for his people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Current events has shown his judgment on Iraq as wrong,. there were no WMD.  Iraq was not apart of the attack on the WTC.  The surge did not change the war.  The ethnic cleansing was nearly complete.  there are over 2 million Iraqi refugees outside the country.  The people live in Sunni and Shiite ghettos.  Wanting war is not strength.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hearing something out means nothing.  saying McCain is similar to Bush and Bush was wrong is not Bush bashing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:27:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tuesday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/tuesday_open_thread_79/#comment-1856251</link><description>The failure was going into Iraq.  NO WMD.  NO connection to WCC attacks.  Inspectors wher in Iraq looking for WMD.  They looked everywhere we told them Iraq was hiding WMD.  Iraqis said teverything had been destroyed, but we did not keep good records.  A few more months and we all could have been sure there were no WMD.  Hans Blix was right.  George Bush and the CIA were wrong. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama did not support a quick withdrawal.  He did propose a 16 month time line.  This seems reasonable to me considering we should have never been there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is an enbarassment if the government misleads the people onn the need for war.  It is an embarassment if the government does not plan for how to end the conflict..  It is embarassment if the USA tortures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The organization that failed in Katrina was staffed by Bush.  His attitude toward  FEMA caused him to appoint incompetent managers, because he thought it did not matter.  The leader of an organoization is sometimes responsible for the failure of the organization.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:14:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tuesday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/tuesday_open_thread_79/#comment-1856533</link><description>Obama plan anticipates your concern and he leans on the current group insurance plans in the USA.  He does not propose single payer.  As for paying for it, we are paying for this system in poor health.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is something the country needs to move toward.  We are paying for this system by people doing things they would not do to have insurance, taking and staying in the wrong jobs., not starting businesses, and several other decisions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We do have the money, the excessive Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am sorry you have no sympathy for people suffering.  You can have sympathy without thinking the government should help.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DOD could us a cut.  Why are we spending so much money on the military.  If we had a smaller military, maybe we would not start so many wars.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:35:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tuesday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/tuesday_open_thread_79/#comment-1856609</link><description>Sarcasm seems inapprpiate concerning the deaths and destruction of Katrina.  There were things the US government could have done.  They hav nothing to do with Rice,   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bush could have hired a competent leader fo FEMA.  the governmant could give NOLA more aid.  The levee sytem could be improved now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thousands suffered and our goverbnmant did less than enough.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:41:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tuesday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/tuesday_open_thread_79/#comment-1858056</link><description>Now who is using talking points?  The reason you give for Obama's proposal is a McCain talking point.  Calling it appease does not mean it is wrong.  The point is you said he called for a quick withdrawal.  He did not.  When that is pointed out to you , you label it as appeasement of his base.  First of all that makes no sense.  he was aginst the war.  He called out the reasons.  No WMD.  The war was not necessary to resolve any issues with Iraq.  Iraq was not part of WCC attack.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because he was against the motives of the war calling for a withdrawal would be consistent with his original analysis.   So it is not appeasement.  Besides there is nothing morally wrong with wanting to end a policy or practice your constituents are against.  As a matter of fact, it makes good sense for the nation, unless the policy is vital to security interest of the nation.  This war is not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brownie was fired.  But we need more than people held responsible, we need responsible people in government.  It is not important that Bush fired him.  The man was unqualified for the job.  He should have never been hired.  In addition his boss, Homeland Secty, failed his responsibility at the time and Bush continues to fail NOLA by not making it a greater priority for restoration.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:30:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democratic National Convention - Tuesday Night Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/democratic_national_convention_tuesday_night_open_thread/#comment-1864196</link><description>I think the speech by Hillary was good.  She promoted Obama.  She referenced the woman's movement which is appropriate for her.  I was not offended by the use of Harriet Tubman, she was from New York and her words, "keep going" were the right words and led to the right words for the end of the speech "start going"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not sure what the critiques of the speech wanted.  I don't think she needs to take back any statements.  That was the campaign.  They were said in the campaign.  The campaign is over.  She can still believe he is inexperienced and the best choice for very good reasons.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:13:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tuesday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/tuesday_open_thread_79/#comment-1864248</link><description>I did say Obama is not Bush.  Just because you believe the surge work does not mean everybody must believe it.  Indivisula purchase of health insurance will do more than what you say on personal responsibility.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not wanting war is not weakness.  Wanting war is weakness.  The military view that any war we are in, we must win is not based in the needs of the country, but on the needs of the military.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:27:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democratic National Convention - Tuesday Night Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/democratic_national_convention_tuesday_night_open_thread/#comment-1867333</link><description>I saw her yesterday out from behind those TV desk.  The sister has, from what I could see, some healthy legs.  I liked it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nothing but the dog in me. UUGH.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:21:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/wednesday_open_thread_00/#comment-1875679</link><description>Here is the link to the article&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/26/AR2008082603894.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama sought funding for a hospital and a nursing school.  The nursing school received 192,000 at Xavier University to support the nursing program  Xavier Nursing school graduates more Latino and AA nurses than any private school in the Illinois.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sxu.edu/son/default.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sxu.edu/son/default.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The hospital, Thorek Memorial Hospital, Obama requested funds for a Cancer Research Center.  The hospital has extensive cancer treatment programs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thorek.org/site/epage/33162_562.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.thorek.org/site/epage/33162_562.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama list all earmark request on his website.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:19:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/wednesday_open_thread_00/#comment-1875953</link><description>D,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you miss the USA Today Link?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON — Sen. John McCain secured millions in federal funds for a land acquisition program that provided a windfall for an Arizona developer whose executives were major campaign donors, public records show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;McCain, who has made fighting special-interest projects a centerpiece of his presidential campaign, inserted $14.3 million in a 2003 defense bill to buy land around Luke Air Force Base in a provision sought by SunCor Development, e.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Air Force later paid SunCor $3 million for 122 acres near the base. It was the highest single land transaction of the private lots purchased by the government — three times the county's assessed value and twice the military's estimated value. SunCor also donated another 122 acres. Alan Bunnell, a spokesman for SunCor's parent company, Pinnacle West Capital, said the donation was meant to minimize the company's tax bill and enhance the value of adjacent property it owns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;McCain has long-standing ties to SunCor and Pinnacle West:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• McCain's campaigns have received $224,000 since 1998 from donors connected to Pinnacle West, including $104,100 for his current presidential run...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• Pinnacle West's Chief Executive Officer Bill Post, vice president and lobbyist Robert Aiken and former president Jack Davis, who retired in March, are fundraisers for McCain's current presidential campaign. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SunCor President Steve Betts, who joined the company weeks after the military land deal, is a former campaign lawyer for McCain and has raised more than $100,000 for his current campaign.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:41:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The LIES Told By Sarah Palin</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/the_lies_told_by_sarah_palin/#comment-2186664</link><description>Obama said the children are off limits, not the parents.  You can say they are poor parents without condemning the children.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:50:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: James Fallows Breaks it Down about McCain&amp;#8217;s Choice &amp;#038; The Bush Doctrine</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/james_fallows_breaks_it_down_about_mccain8217s_choice_038_the_bush_doctrine/#comment-2301303</link><description>You are so right.  I appreciate the time you tok to explain.  I wold go on to say that as a Mayor of a small town (6000 population - 2000 census) and Governer of a small state (683,000 -2007 estimate) dependent on one industry, petroleum, revenue stream has no reason to be interested in these issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;,</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:36:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Media Alert</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/media_alert_43/#comment-2417123</link><description>On Huffington Post there is a video of HRC and Joe Biden discussing womens issues.  My speakers are broken, so I can not hear it.  All the comments on HuffPo are very positive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I tried to find on YouTube.  I hope it is good for you.  Link is below.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/18/biden-clinton-chat-it-up_n_127345.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/18/biden-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 06:19:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does John McCain Know Where Spain Is?</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/does_john_mccain_know_where_spain_is/#comment-2423130</link><description>He has no honor and he has some dementia.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:52:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thursday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/thursday_open_thread_75/#comment-2625056</link><description>Did you notice how five people rebutted everything you wrote in less than 150 words total and it took you over 200 words to explain how McCain was a leader and Obama was not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is hard to be concise when you are spreading Bullsh**.  The Prince of Wales says chug a lug.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:02:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thursday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/thursday_open_thread_75/#comment-2625237</link><description>Obama and McCain are not needed to write the bill.  Bills in the legislative body of the United States are written by the committees responsible for the activity.  Tha Banking committees of the house and senate write banking legislation.   Neither Obama or McCain are on the banking committee.  They have no responsibility to write the bill.  Dodd and Sen Shelby R (ranking member) will write the bill on the Senate side with input from interested Senators through the majority and minority leaders.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama has been dsicussing it with Dodd and Paulson.  McCain should be talking to Shelby and Paulson also.  He has not, that  is why you see no GOP Senators on TV supporting the McCain move.  They will not, because they know it is a sham.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:14:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saturday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/saturday_open_thread_00/#comment-2841389</link><description>Here is a link to an article by Joe Conason of Salon on the intelligence of GOP VP candidate, Sarah Palin.  Why is the GOP not embarrassed?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/10/04/dumb/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/10/04...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:16:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JJP On News &amp;#038; Notes Today 1:20pm ET</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/jjp_on_news_038_notes_today_120pm_et/#comment-2943455</link><description>The values you list to be considered a small business are gross receipts. Thevalues for taxes are income.  I fail to see why small businesses or employees who make over 250,000 a year should not pay the same amount in taxes.  The income is being taxed not the business.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The small business owner does have an opportunity to decrease income by investing in his business.  The small business owner  that earned over 250,00 has benefited form the exorbitant Bush tax cuts.  The country is in deep debt and has some serious responsibilities in the future.  The people who have benefited the most should begin to pay their fair share of taxes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:46:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JJP On News &amp;#038; Notes Today 1:20pm ET</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/jjp_on_news_038_notes_today_120pm_et/#comment-2944685</link><description>My bad.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:05:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tuesday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/tuesday_open_thread_973/#comment-3200655</link><description>BIden's complete comments were that Obama had a spine of steel to handle any test.  Do not fall for the hype.  They cut the quote short to make  a big deal of it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:33:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Discussion Thread #2 - Lieberman and the Can of Whip-A** That&amp;#8217;s About to Get Dropped on Him</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/discussion_thread_2_lieberman_and_the_can_of_whip_a_that8217s_about_to_get_dropped_on_him/#comment-3591073</link><description>Obama does not have to think any more about Lieberman, the die is set.  Lieberman can consider his options, all he wants.  He promised he would not attack Obama.  He attacked Obama several times.  Choices and elections have consequences.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lieberman must deal with the consequences of his choice.  He is not a Democrat.  He criticized the Democratic PE on personal issues, not just policy issues.  He believes there can be too many Democrats in the Senate.  He should not be Chairman of anything.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:43:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Monday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/monday_open_thread_24/#comment-3662917</link><description>Axelrod said about Obama's ambition.  This comment is from the CBS 60 minutes article.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"But it was whether he had that pathological drive to be president. You know, so often, what defines presidential candidates is this need to be president, to define themselves. He didn't have that. And, you know, we told him, 'You're gonna have to find some other way to motivate yourself.' And he did, which was what he could do as president." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is the advantage Obama had over every candidate for President since Ronald Reagan and perhaps Paul Tsongas.  He wanted to do things for the country, that he felt uniquely qualified to execute.  I believe RR, TP, and perhaps Jimmy Carter wanted to move the country in a certain direction.  RR was charismatic and succeeded.  Carter and Tsongas were not good politicians.  Carter has proven he is a moral person with genuine concern for justice and development.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;None of the serious candidates in 2008 and 2004 were as in touch with the "do" part of President as Obama.  The "be" president ambition will lead you to major in minors, as HRC and Johnny Mac campaigns did when they started losing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a lesson there for all of us.  What are you to do as a parent, Christian, Muslim, sister, brother, spouse, child, nephew/niece, cousin, uncle/aunt, etc.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:05:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama - Not Black?</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/barack_obama_not_black/#comment-4084596</link><description>There are few, if any pure African descenadants of slaves in America.  My maternal Grandmothers' family was most likely Cherokee in Middle Tennesee that chose to live as Blacks rather than move to the Indian Territory (Oklahoma).  Her father took his family out there and came back to tennnesee because the people lived in tents.  Her maiden name, Crawford, is a recognized as anglicized Cherokee name.  Look at the Crawofrds you know.  None that I know are dark,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My Grandfather and his siblings are the likely offspring of a white man and their Black mother.  I write this to note that my personl infomration is aligned with Henry Louis Gates analysis of the semi-random famous sample in his public research.  Race in America is very much cultural and genetic.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:09:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8221; The People&amp;#8217;s Inauguration&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/8221_the_people8217s_inauguration8221/#comment-4222105</link><description>Right On with the Right On.   As we see Black affluence step up to the plate at all levels we should not be surprised as Blacks in distress continue to step up. I gave more and worked harder this election cycle than the last. Obama demonstrates a manhood that even hustlers will be forced to admire.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My adult daughter and her friends are having an Obama themed New Years Eve Party. My three year old granddaughter said, "he is brown like us."  Ibelieve and know we will all tighten up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:14:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blagojevich On Obama: &amp;#8220;F*%$ Him.&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/blagojevich_on_obama_8220f_him8221/#comment-4299710</link><description>You are wrong. Jarret has ready decliend tha appointment.  There is o evidence Candidate 5 is Jesse Jr.    # 5 was opposed by Obama.  Jesse Jr. was an early supporter.  I am do believe Obama would oppose Jesse Jr.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:01:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Black People Feel About Jesse Jackson Jr.</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/how_black_people_feel_about_jesse_jackson_jr/#comment-4411529</link><description>rikyrah  &lt;br&gt;You said it all for Jesse Jr.  He is a good congressman.  He needs to settle down his language just a bit.  He needs to get a little more cmfrotable in his voice, like Harold Ford.  His future in statewide politics is over, but there is a lot to accomplish by being a presence in the US House.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe he was honest in his dealings with the Governor, because he does not have a strong donor base(can't raise large cash) and he is smart enough to avoid traps that would make him seem similar to his father seems.  He can be a strong Black voice for the most progressives policies in the congress.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:55:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Guilty Ya&amp;#8217;ll Got To Feel Me</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/not_guilty_ya8217ll_got_to_feel_me/#comment-4437343</link><description>There were people here yesterday proclaiming JJjr guilty.  Now it appears not only is he not guilty, he is just as innocent as Obama.  He was letting tthe Governor out to hang before letting the Governor hang was cool.  Cynicism is no more realistic than naivete.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:21:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pat Buchanan Award</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/pat_buchanan_award_31/#comment-4437601</link><description>Whatsa matter boss wees sick?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am a veteran and I am proud of the progress the country has made.  I was insuslted by Bush's silly response to an attack on the living head of state.  The POTUS is the Head fo State and the chief government official.  Someone throwing a  shoe at him is not a joke.  It is serious.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Juan's response is not serious.  The French should be grateful foe WW1 and WW2. Freed slaves should be grateful for the Union Army.  Vietnamese and Iraqis owe the USA nothing.  We owe them a change in our behavior toward the rest of the world</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:31:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tuesday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/tuesday_open_thread_35/#comment-4591760</link><description>Almost all HBCUs devloped during and because of segregation.  MOrris brown is owned by the AME church.  But the church in Georgia and the USA can not afford to rescue the school.  Some HBCUs will dissolve.  It is sad, but it is the cost of an open society.  I attended Michigan State and graduated from Howard.  I send money to Howard, but I care for the succes of both schools.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rule of thumb, adapt or succumb.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:23:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blago Selecting Roland Burris to fill Obama&amp;#8217;s Senate Seat?</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/blago_selecting_roland_burris_to_fill_obama8217s_senate_seat/#comment-4787431</link><description>It definitle was not Bpbby Rush.  He has no chance of getting any statewide office.  He is borderline incompetent and a former Black Panther (unacceptable to downstate whites).   Congressman Danny Davis was recommeded by west side preachers before Blago was arrested.  Congressman JJ jr is southside rep with strong case.  Emil Jones was being considered as caretaker appointee,  Of course, Valerie Jarret was also on the Blago shortlist before the arrest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No other balcks were ever mentioned.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:44:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blago Selecting Roland Burris to fill Obama&amp;#8217;s Senate Seat?</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/blago_selecting_roland_burris_to_fill_obama8217s_senate_seat/#comment-4787567</link><description>Nobody is going to be pushed into anything by Bobby Rush.  Rep. Bobby Rush has no credibility outside his district.  If Burris and Rush make this a Black thing in the age of Obama they will get little support.  Reid and the Senate have spoken.  Obama the PE has spoken.  Burris finished third in the Dem primary to Blago.  Blago thanked him for pulling Black votes from the second place contestant, a Black man at  the time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:55:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About Jesse Jackson Jr.&amp;#8217;s so-called &amp;#8216; Electability&amp;#8217; Problem</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/about_jesse_jackson_jr8217s_so_called_8216_electability8217_problem/#comment-4918463</link><description>I agree with you very much on this.  Blago's versions have no credibility.  Check the source of info before taking sides.  So what if there is no Black Senator, it’s because the Black Senator is now the Black President.  There is a Black Governor of New York and Mass.  There has already been a Black Governor of Virginia.  Harold Ford lost a relatively close race in Tennessee.  Blackwell ran in Ohio for the GOP and will perhaps be elected RNC Chairman.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The glass is more than half full</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:26:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Burris Refused Seat in Congress &amp;#8212; Let&amp;#8217;s Play Racial Chicken!</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/burris_refused_seat_in_congress_8212_let8217s_play_racial_chicken/#comment-4939557</link><description>Immorality and legal guilt is not the same thing.  People do moral things and are guilty of a crime, (MLK, Rosa Parks, etc.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People do immoral things that are absolutely legal, (GW Bush).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Blagoyovich tried to sell the Senate appointment.&lt;br&gt;2. Any appointment he makes to the Senate is tainted by the previous attempt to sell.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) If you know your cousin is a shoplifter, 2) anything he sells you is tainted by the high probability it was stolen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is that straight forward and simple.  Just because it is a James Brown CD instead of Paul Anka, does not make it a good thing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:47:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Burris Refused Seat in Congress &amp;#8212; Let&amp;#8217;s Play Racial Chicken!</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/burris_refused_seat_in_congress_8212_let8217s_play_racial_chicken/#comment-4939743</link><description>The Secty. Of State, Jesse White (AA-Dem), stated previously he was not going to certify.  This is a two step process.  Burris must suit for the certification before and win.  When that happens he will approach the Senate.  The Senate will reject him based on the taint issue.  That will then be litigated.  If Burris wins then he will have the seat.  The Democrats would have fought for the integrity of the process by opposing the tainted appointment and the rule of law will prevail.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This has always been the way it was going to play out.  All the big time ballers and shot callers have known this for some time.  Burris knew this when he showed up.  I believe he showed up to create spin and noise.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:56:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Burris Refused Seat in Congress &amp;#8212; Let&amp;#8217;s Play Racial Chicken!</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/burris_refused_seat_in_congress_8212_let8217s_play_racial_chicken/#comment-4939939</link><description>No he did not.  Blago's move demonstrates how easy some are manipulated by appealing to tribal instincts.  This is not news.  None of the Blacks on this website would be defending Blago if he appointed Lisa Madigan, (white current Atty General)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Always cheering for the brother or sister even when they are wrong.  It is this instinct that has ruined Zimbabwe.  This instinct almost ruined the USA further, if whites had rejected Obama for McCain.  Southern whites still choose their tribe over morality and the region stays backwards.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Intelligence, competence, and morality should guide us.  Mind, Body and Spirit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:08:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Burris Refused Seat in Congress &amp;#8212; Let&amp;#8217;s Play Racial Chicken!</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/burris_refused_seat_in_congress_8212_let8217s_play_racial_chicken/#comment-4940028</link><description>I think Harris was indicted with Blago.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:14:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Burris Refused Seat in Congress &amp;#8212; Let&amp;#8217;s Play Racial Chicken!</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/burris_refused_seat_in_congress_8212_let8217s_play_racial_chicken/#comment-4940062</link><description>Except that Blago has tried to sell the seat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:16:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Burris Refused Seat in Congress &amp;#8212; Let&amp;#8217;s Play Racial Chicken!</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/burris_refused_seat_in_congress_8212_let8217s_play_racial_chicken/#comment-4940104</link><description>The fact that Reid said it would happen this way means nothing to you.  Burris said he should not make the appointment.  Danny Davis turned down the appointment.  The legislature is rushing to impeach him so he can do no more harm.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;None of these things mean anything to you?  Perhaps you have not adjusted your racism meter since Obam was elected.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:17:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Burris Refused Seat in Congress &amp;#8212; Let&amp;#8217;s Play Racial Chicken!</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/burris_refused_seat_in_congress_8212_let8217s_play_racial_chicken/#comment-4940121</link><description>Waht is the basis for that statement?  Watch out for paranoia?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:20:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A POC May Be in Charge of NASA</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/a_poc_may_be_in_charge_of_nasa/#comment-4987971</link><description>That is funny, kinda, sorta...&lt;br&gt;The guy looks like he is Roland Burris' cousin.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:51:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A POC May Be in Charge of NASA</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/a_poc_may_be_in_charge_of_nasa/#comment-4988008</link><description>Do they have Omegas at US Naval Academy?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:55:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A POC May Be in Charge of NASA</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/a_poc_may_be_in_charge_of_nasa/#comment-4988153</link><description>Ronald Ervin McNair, Ph.D. a Black astronaut died January 28, 1986 aboard Challenger Space Shuttle, was also from South Carolina.  McNair would have been 58 last October 21.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:07:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is the CBC going to do about Joseph Cao and Steve Cohen?</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/what_is_the_cbc_going_to_do_about_joseph_cao_and_steve_cohen/#comment-4998566</link><description>If the CBC is about constiuents, shouldn't other congressman form other idstricts be invited.  Could the CBC exist because the membere share an interest and a point of view.  The Blue Dog caucus is based on the views and interest of the members not the status of the citizens. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; I do not believe CBC is about constiuents.  It is about the member.  Ellsion and Burris, once seated, will be members.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:47:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thursday Afternoon Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/thursday_afternoon_open_thread/#comment-4998746</link><description>It is on DVD.  You must not be up late enough to see the infmercial</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:57:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/friday_open_thread_91/#comment-5015152</link><description>From the Chicao Tribune&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/clout_st/2009/01/live-blog-of-il.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/clout_st/20...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rep. Milt Patterson (D-Chicago) was the lone vote against impeaching the governor. Patterson, from Chicago's Southwest Side, said after the roll call that he didn't feel it was his job to vote to impeach the governor. He declined comment on whether he approved of the job Blagojevich is doing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:07:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/friday_open_thread_91/#comment-5015467</link><description>No it does not.  Everything does not have to have a final answer.  We need more ambiguity in our lives.  I enjoy the Bowl games because they still have collegiate spirit.  A playoff system will generate into corporate party places.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:11:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friday Open Thread</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/friday_open_thread_91/#comment-5016725</link><description>Al could use the steady paycheck, as could we all going into 2009.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:30:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Florida Congressman Kendrick Meek to Run for U.S. Senate</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/florida_congressman_kendrick_meek_to_run_for_us_senate/#comment-5093836</link><description>Some of the criticisms here of meek are similar to the criticisms of Obama, not drinking the Black folks Kool Aid.  I am particularly sensitive as mmany bourgeoisie Blacks may have experienced.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My dad played golf. About 50-75 other Blacks in our mid sized midwestern city played golf.  I was a smart kid and an only child.  My peers accused me of thinking and acting white.  We were all struggling.  My parents struggled for fair employment just like theirs.  I ate beans and neckbones just like they did.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;late in life a friend of mine and I coined a phrase for this attitude, "Charging admission to be Black"  If your Black experience is different from mine, then you are not Black enough.  We saw this in "Barack was raised by a white family and his father is African.  He has no slave heritage.  He is not Black enough"  Now there are people judging Brother Meek as lacking because he backed Hillary Clinton not Obama early on.  Some how that says something negative about his support for the Black community.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no charge to be Black.  All of respond to this sick racism in our individual ways.  Each response is real.  Some responses are more ethical, uplifting, positive and couragous than others, but they all are a Black response to racism.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:07:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dear Malia and Sasha,</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/dear_malia_and_sasha/#comment-5118495</link><description>I have been angry at my wife and said some foul things.  They have been mostly exclamations, "F U" and such.  I may have said "go to H".  I could write those words on my best day.  But I agree, anybody that could be that dispararging of a loved one, call them a cunt, could not use language that profound, loving, and honest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nardwilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:21:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>