<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Drew</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/b1800e86b456163fcfc53e8aafa0fec4/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:24:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: MacBook, DI-614+ Dropouts Resolved</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/macbook_di_614_dropouts_resolved/#comment-1748261</link><description>Thank you so much for this information!  I just moved to a MacBook from being a long time PC user and couldn't figure out why PCs on my wireless network were zooming while the Internet connection on my MacBook was abysmal.  This is a HUGE help!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Drew</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:54:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Unexpectedly, IPhone Text Entry Takes Time To Learn: Study</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/not_unexpectedly_iphone_text_entry_takes_time_to_learn_study/#comment-18830769</link><description>You would expect people to read the manual?  Come on, nobody reads manuals.  Also, i agree with the others about predictive text - I don&amp;#39;t believe it&amp;#39;s nearly as prevalent as you represent.  Hell, I know lots of people in the industry who still multi-tap...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Drew</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:19:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Returning The iPhone After Two Weeks Of Daily Use</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/returning_the_iphone_after_two_weeks_of_daily_use/#comment-18831913</link><description>I was having severe battery problems at first, too.  I&amp;#39;d be barely using the thing, and have it go totally dead in about 5 hours.  Well, I found that there are 2 things that had a major impact on my battery life:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, I called the support line.  They had me disable push, which I hated since I prefer to have real time access to email.  This immediately stopped the rapid drain on the battery.  In truth, it&amp;#39;s rare that I REALLY need real time push, and while I&amp;#39;m not HAPPY about it, it&amp;#39;s tolerable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, I read somewhere that you should not restore a previous iPhone/iTouch backup to the iPhone when initially activating it.  When I went back and restored it to factory settings, the battery life improved even more, and I have even seen my battery life at least double, even with push enabled.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&amp;#39;m sure there is a bug in the push email function that keeps the battery warm and draining in such rapid fashion.  I&amp;#39;m hoping to see some improvements in upcoming software releases.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Drew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:33:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Fine Print: AT&amp;amp;T Disappoints On iPhone Upgrades</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/the_fine_print_atampt_disappoints_on_iphone_upgrades/#comment-18889694</link><description>Why do you make it sound like only &amp;quot;switchers&amp;quot; get the subsidized rate?  That&amp;#39;s patently false.  I&amp;#39;d love to upgrade my iPhone every year, too, but the reality is I signed a 2 year contract in exchange for a device subsidy.  But when that contract is up, guess what?  I can get a new subsidized iPhone in exchange for signing a new agreement. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The perception problem for AT&amp;amp;T stems from the fact that the first gen iPhone was sold without a subsidy, so when they added the subsidy to the 3G model, they allowed previous iPhone purchasers to upgrade without penalty.  That was generous on AT&amp;amp;T&amp;#39;s part, and not required by the subscriber agreements.  Now, they (rightfully) want to earn the subsidy back per the terms of the original agreement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&amp;#39;s enough angst out there over this issue without having you hype it up with distorted facts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Drew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:24:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>