<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for FishNChipPapers</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/b14ee2babdfd2518f871213bc80e52b0/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 05:18:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TPW 30: Sprigman on Copyright</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/tpw_30_sprigman_on_copyright/#comment-1452109</link><description>Very interesting podcast. I am not a lawyer but it struck me that the value of IP-free industries, such as cookery, magic and fashion, is in large part a combination of the innovative idea, the "ingredients" and the process. In contrast, once a book or piece of music has been created, it can be easily duplicated. So, give me a recipe and you can be sure that I will not create a meal of the same value as a Michelin-starred chef - I lack the process skills, the quality of ingredients, the "tricks of the trade" etc etc. Similarly, give me the instructions for a magic trick and my ham fisted-ness will ensure that I won't be able to replicate the experience for the audience. Ditto re black material and the pattern for a chanel dress - it's not going to happen.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FishNChipPapers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 05:18:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>