<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Gavin Hudson</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/b093b3804081b62af807705762d0417e/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:58:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Aquafina&amp;#8217;s New Eco-Fina Bottle: Greenwash or Progress?</title><link>http://lighterfootstep.disqus.com/aquafina8217s_new_eco_fina_bottle_greenwash_or_progress/#comment-22518159</link><description>I agree with the line: &amp;quot;While no disposable plastic product will ever be truly sustainable, we&amp;rsquo;d be less than honest if we didn&amp;rsquo;t admit that the new Aquafina bottles are a step in the right direction.&amp;quot; Nicely done, Pepsi. However, if people stop demanding disposables altogether, it&amp;#039;ll be a bigger landmark.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gavin Hudson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:58:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Old School CleanTech: How to Bike to Work</title><link>http://ecotechdaily.disqus.com/old_school_cleantech_how_to_bike_to_work/#comment-1171891</link><description>Can't believe I missed the day's celebrations.. oh well.. at least I biked to work today. I was there at the after-party in spirit. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gavin Hudson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:28:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Potty Tech: Which Is Greener, Toilet Paper Or A Bidet?</title><link>http://ecotechdaily.disqus.com/potty_tech_which_is_greener_toilet_paper_or_a_bidet/#comment-1171903</link><description>This is a wonderful post! I love the puns as well as the subject itself. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In S. Korea, we have a large number of bidet toilets that are really very high tech. They have heated seats, settings for men, and settings for women.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've often wondered which is best. Now I'm sold on a bidet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus, it makes you feel A LOT cleaner than toilet paper. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gavin Hudson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:13:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Carbon Footprint of Carbon Footprint Calculators</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/the_carbon_footprint_of_carbon_footprint_calculators/#comment-17550197</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very funny April Fools pic and post. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nicely done.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do wonder, though, about how to green time spent online. I know that many utility companies are offering ... it must be most people in the States by now ... people the choice to buy renewable energy. Also, I've read about green powered servers...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gavin Hudson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:16:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Greenland Wants To Bottle Iceberg Water</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/greenland_wants_to_bottle_iceberg_water/#comment-17581109</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for this article. One note on accuracy: the source article estimates the water's age to be 1,000 - 3,000 years old. This article on Treehugger says 3,000 - 10,000 years old. I'm just wondering if there are any other sources for this article other than the Copenhagen post where the older dates might have come from.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, EcoWorldly together with ViroPOP videos has teamed up with another post on this story at &lt;a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/27/bye-bye-bottled-water/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/27/bye-bye-bottle...&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Gavin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;-------author replies ----------&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hi, Gavin:&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did look at quite a few other sources for the article, as it was quite difficult to find web sites for the companies or entities mentioned. I can't supply and overall authority for the age of the water, however.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gavin Hudson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 02:23:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Greenland Wants To Bottle Iceberg Water</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/greenland_wants_to_bottle_iceberg_water/#comment-17581110</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for this article. One note on accuracy: the source article estimates the water's age to be 1,000 - 3,000 years old. This article on Treehugger says 3,000 - 10,000 years old. I'm just wondering if there are any other sources for this article other than the Copenhagen post where the older dates might have come from.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, EcoWorldly together with ViroPOP videos has teamed up with another post on this story at &lt;a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/27/bye-bye-bottled-water/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/27/bye-bye-bottle...&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Gavin&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gavin Hudson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 02:24:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>