<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for andrewsmit</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/andrewsmit/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/andrewsmit/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 11:20:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Apple was right to refuse to help the FBI</title><link>https://techcentral.co.za/apple-was-right-to-refuse-to-help-the-fbi/64253/#comment-2605434044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Think we're going to have to agree to disagree here, but I believe the "So long as the devices are under Apple's control in a controlled environment" is naïve, there is no way that software would remain private, but that's a matter of opinion, not fact.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 11:20:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple was right to refuse to help the FBI</title><link>https://techcentral.co.za/apple-was-right-to-refuse-to-help-the-fbi/64253/#comment-2605405179</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But the FBI said it's "just about one phone" - if it becomes law then definitely not just about phone, it's technically a backdoor.&lt;br&gt;If Apple (and Samsung etc) had to comply in order to sell their devices in the US, what's stopping China from putting the same laws in place.&lt;br&gt;Apple's PR campaign and lawsuits were different things, the PR campaign (particularly Cook's cancer comment) weren't great, but from what I read their legal stance was pretty solid.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 11:03:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple was right to refuse to help the FBI</title><link>https://techcentral.co.za/apple-was-right-to-refuse-to-help-the-fbi/64253/#comment-2605398498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No I understand, sorry, the key alone exists, the software doesn't.&lt;br&gt;How do you know it's trivial to rewrite the software?&lt;br&gt;Regardless, even if it was 5 minutes work, do you believe a court has the right to order a developer to write it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 10:58:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple was right to refuse to help the FBI</title><link>https://techcentral.co.za/apple-was-right-to-refuse-to-help-the-fbi/64253/#comment-2605273932</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The master key doesn't exist, it would have to be written by apple's engineers.&lt;br&gt;Would be interesting though, could a court compel a company to write software?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 09:38:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPad mini review: why Apple thinks you are an idiot</title><link>https://gearburn.com/2012/12/ipad-mini-review-why-apple-thinks-you-are-an-idiot/#comment-735794606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The 2nd hand market for Apple products is great as well...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:31:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPad mini review: why Apple thinks you are an idiot</title><link>https://gearburn.com/2012/12/ipad-mini-review-why-apple-thinks-you-are-an-idiot/#comment-735789154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Challenge accepted. :) I do get a little annoyed when I see "Steve Jobs would never" but thanks for the clarification, makes a little more sense. Of course it's ok to theorise, but we need to consider the facts first.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, you're right, there is no rule, but Apple watchers know that Apple follows rules that tend to repeat itself, and is key to their success. The iPad 2 (non-retina) launched 8 months after the iPhone 4 (retina).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why the iPad Mini with non-retina makes sense:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Cheap 7" Tablets were started selling well, possibly eating into the iPad's marketshare, Apple needed a "horse in this race" this is beyond doubt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Apple's margins are legendary, they've managed to remain price competitive in the tablet market and "ultra book" whilst maintaining these margins, but these margins are decreasing, Apple can't afford to take a hit of their margins, and it's not in their DNA to sell products for a loss or small profit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Knowing that, Apple has to release a smaller tablet in 2012, and they need to sell it for a profit - enter the iPad Mini. To include a retina meant that it would increase the price making it a hard sell against those 7" tablets from Google and Amazon and it would significantly heavier.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So Apple needed something in 2012, it needed to be better than the competition in areas that mattered (weight) and it had to be significantly cheaper than existing iPads. Those 4 factors are why the 2012 iPad Mini doesn't have a retina screen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My prediction is that we will see an upgrade of the internals of the iPad Mini next year, but no retina screen (unless Apple make some breakthrough in SoC and battery design) and when we do see the retina iPad Mini come out, the existing Mini drops in price and continues to sell well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think Steve Jobs would have been proud of the iPad Mini. Mine arrives next week. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:23:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPad mini review: why Apple thinks you are an idiot</title><link>https://gearburn.com/2012/12/ipad-mini-review-why-apple-thinks-you-are-an-idiot/#comment-735728628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The iPhone went retina in it's 4th generation, the iPad in it's 3rd, you want the Mini to go retina in it's 1st? Apple has a high stock price and large profits for a reason, they're not stupid.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When you use lines like "I cannot help but think that if Jobs was still in charge – he would have done something" you discredit yourself and this review. No one knows what Steve Jobs would have done, let alone you, it's pointless making that statement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let's not forget the mistakes that Apple made under Jobs: MobileMe, Scratched iPod Nano, iPod Hifi, Puck Mouse, the Cube, iTunes ROCKR (Motorola phone with iTunes).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:44:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet killing the video store</title><link>http://www.techcentral.co.za/internet-killing-the-video-store/32918/#comment-564345943</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting that video rentals are dropping, and I'm sure piracy + VOD services are partly to blame, but not all. DVD prices (to purchase) are significantly cheaper these days, so surely they play a role as well? they used to be in the R300+ range, now most are between R100 and R150.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 05:36:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Once Again, RSS Is Dead. But ONLY YOU Can Save It!</title><link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/01/once-again-rss-is-dead-but-only-you-can-save-it.php#comment-422181300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rss is still alive, according to me anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:41:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Carrier IQ: do SA mobile operators use snooping software?</title><link>http://mybroadband.co.za/news/cellular/39217-carrier-iq-do-sa-mobile-operators-use-snooping-software.html#comment-377387388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh, I follow relatively closely, and I don't think it's "well known that ALL Apple iPhones spy on their users by relaying certain points of data to Apple". Can you be so kind as to provide proof?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:52:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2010 Outsurance 94.5 KFM Gun Run Entries are open!</title><link>http://www.atlanticathletic.co.za/2010/07/28/outsurance-94-5-kfm-gun-run-entries-are-open/#comment-324550588</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nope entries are closed. This page refers to the 2010 race though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:01:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saturday Morning Run</title><link>http://www.atlanticathletic.co.za/club-info/club-runs/saturday/#comment-303444334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes it definitely still happens. Looking forward to catching you on the road.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 06:54:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Time Trial</title><link>http://www.atlanticathletic.co.za/club-info/club-runs/586-2/#comment-292973940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course, you're welcome to join.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:41:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Time Trial</title><link>http://www.atlanticathletic.co.za/club-info/club-runs/586-2/#comment-275992372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yip, Mike Russell will be there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:42:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Time Trial</title><link>http://www.atlanticathletic.co.za/club-info/club-runs/586-2/#comment-275989407</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Johan. There will be a time trial this evening.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:34:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going solar at home</title><link>http://pauljacobson.org/2011/04/09/going-solar-at-home/#comment-181517436</link><description>&lt;p&gt;R30k is very optimistic, I suggest you read this article by Tim Cohen - &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/gBWAN2" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/gBWAN2"&gt;http://bit.ly/gBWAN2&lt;/a&gt; - that said, solar panels for your geyser is a cost effective, and you make money back very quickly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 12:21:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lighthouse 10km Night Race</title><link>http://www.atlanticathletic.co.za/races/lighthouse-10km-night-race/#comment-166219799</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The results are out! - &lt;a href="http://wp.me/p1q2mj-8g" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wp.me/p1q2mj-8g"&gt;http://wp.me/p1q2mj-8g&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:26:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lighthouse 10km Night Race</title><link>http://www.atlanticathletic.co.za/races/lighthouse-10km-night-race/#comment-162286264</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jason,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comment, we will look at including them next year, although&lt;br&gt;I don't believe the current route would allow a staggered start. The results&lt;br&gt;aren't out yet, as soon as they are, we'll post them here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 05:24:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lighthouse 10km Night Race</title><link>http://www.atlanticathletic.co.za/races/lighthouse-10km-night-race/#comment-162283505</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not yet, as soon as we get them we will post them here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 05:07:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Annual General Meeting</title><link>http://www.atlanticathletic.co.za/latest-news-events/annual-general-meeting/#comment-161671153</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fixed, thanks Grant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 03:24:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Images of Pain and Colour</title><link>http://marcperel.me/post/2142681695#comment-109752758</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Enjoy the blog, really I do, but I have to ask, who pissed you off by telling you that cycling was easy?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:10:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 reasons why the iPad is a fat waste of money</title><link>https://memeburn.com/2010/12/5-reasons-why-ipad-1-0-is-a-fat-waste-of-money/#comment-106275077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps baiting is too strong a word, and it's not meant to be critical, it was clearly written to insight a response, and by getting responses you're doing your job and generating page views.&lt;br&gt;Back to topic though, perhaps a macbook 11" is more suited to your needs?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:28:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 reasons why the iPad is a fat waste of money</title><link>https://memeburn.com/2010/12/5-reasons-why-ipad-1-0-is-a-fat-waste-of-money/#comment-106264393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely some baiting going on here, but ok, I'll bite.&lt;br&gt;You've made some valid points, if the iPad was designed to be a full computer, but it's not.&lt;br&gt;Firstly, the price. If it's too expensive, why is the only valid competitor (the Galaxy Tab) more expensive? And it has half the screen real estate. (Please don't use ZAR comparisons as the iPad isn't officially in South Africa yet)&lt;br&gt;And flash support? Come on, have you read the reviews of the galaxy tab? With flash turned on the browsing crawls to a halt. Apple should be lauded for finally taking a stand against the propriety web plugin.&lt;br&gt;Those are all debatable points however. To call the iPad a waste of money is a bit rich, seeing that over 4 million have been sold (in the US), so surely that debunks that point?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:52:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2009 Outsurance 94.5KFM Gun Run</title><link>http://www.atlanticathletic.co.za/2009/09/14/outsurance-94-5kfm-gun-run/#comment-154487386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Edward,&lt;br&gt;The event is not chip timed, it is timed according to your number. Also please note that this page is for the 2009 race, not the 2010 one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:34:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eric Schmidt and the art of tact</title><link>https://memeburn.com/2010/09/eric-schmidt-and-the-art-of-tact/#comment-81104796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh, Eric Schmidt is not the "Co-CEO" he is the only CEO. Therefore represents the company. Larry is President of Products and Sergey is President of Technology. See &lt;a href="http://www.google.co.za/intl/en/corporate/execs.html#eric" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.google.co.za/intl/en/corporate/execs.html#eric"&gt;http://www.google.co.za/int...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Smit</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:39:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>