<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for andrewhyde</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-1811cb63" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/andrewhyde/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:40:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My Health Care Debate: Only Going to Say This Once</title><link>http://blog.adam-jackson.net/2009/11/10/my-health-care-debate-only-going-to-say-this-once/#comment-22522072</link><description>Well said!  Here is to my health, and more importantly, my neighbors.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:40:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Local Search Results for Ticket Scalping</title><link>http://andrewhy.de/google-local-search-results-for-ticket-scalping/#comment-22464877</link><description>Just a test comment.  New domain and all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:17:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Presenting Founder Collective</title><link>http://cdixon.org/?p=1794#comment-22449333</link><description>This looks fantastic!  Well done on the launch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:43:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Being Open and Honest About Startup Process</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/being-open-and-honest-about-startup-process/#comment-21998722</link><description>Would love to chat, calling now :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:06:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Will Hire Don Dodge?</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/who-will-hire-don-dodge/#comment-21978065</link><description>I would have loved to go to poptech this year, next year!  Next year!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:18:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spec Work is a Ponzi Scheme</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/spec-work-is-a-ponzi-scheme/#comment-21890306</link><description>A band makes a personal work of art to sell. They don't make a  &lt;br&gt;finished song with direction and lyrics built in. They are making a  &lt;br&gt;good that can be sold 100,000+ times. Spec work would be if the  &lt;br&gt;finished album could only be sold once.  There is a lose money point,  &lt;br&gt;a break even point and a get rich point. This is why they do it. Spec  &lt;br&gt;only has a possibility of break even.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think companies should hire one team to do one job. Contract it and  &lt;br&gt;price it competitively.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nobody wins design contests.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:29:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spec Work is a Ponzi Scheme</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/spec-work-is-a-ponzi-scheme/#comment-21801444</link><description>Musicians make the album they want to make to try to sell to an audience.  Spec is if they had to record an album at the direction of each fan for the chance that each fan would buy their version.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Big difference.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:31:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two New Ways To Find A Better Place To Stay On The Road</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/two-new-ways-to-find-a-better-place-to-stay-on-the-road-1.html#comment-21467834</link><description>I've also used BrightKite to search a place and see nearby pictures of the hotels.  Honest reviews, pictures from all around the world.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:17:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Speakers Shouldn&amp;#8217;t Be Paid</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/why-speakers-shouldnt-be-paid/#comment-20592878</link><description>Love your comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not against paying spears at all, I'm against the dogpile of every social media consultant demanding payment without bringing things to the table.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That, I think, is my biggest gripe.  Go to conferences and the people you see the most not attending anything are the people doing the most amazing things.  The content is uninteresting and bland.  Public enemy #1 of this is the paid mediocre repeat speaker.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or so I thought this morning.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Love your last comment.  There is room for a lot of types / ways to do a conference.  What I like everyone else doesn't... but I have to keep wondering how to make things great :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:00:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Speakers Shouldn&amp;#8217;t Be Paid</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/why-speakers-shouldnt-be-paid/#comment-20592742</link><description>Great seeing you this weekend!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:56:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Speakers Shouldn&amp;#8217;t Be Paid</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/why-speakers-shouldnt-be-paid/#comment-20592736</link><description>I think that is key, we are spoiled by some really, really good conferences.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the audience is really looking for basics, then I think smaller groups are the best way of teaching them... there has to be better ways!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:56:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Speakers Shouldn&amp;#8217;t Be Paid</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/why-speakers-shouldnt-be-paid/#comment-20592708</link><description>Good people doing interesting things have a track record of preforming, knowing you have a speech can force you to practice and get really good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are spot on, just wish there was some more innovation in conferences these days.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:55:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boulder&amp;#8217;s Kitchen Cafe Celebrates Five Years by Poisoning Blogger</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/boulders-kitchen-cafe/#comment-20001727</link><description>Yep, you are right.  Your prize has been in my bag (and was the night of Ignite).  Sent off as soon as I read this.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe strongly in both the posting economy and this quote "Is the sustainability of this new age of social media reliant on high fivers and finger pointers?"  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the companies to really benefit, the users must post, the good and bad.  You will also notice I post quite a bit positive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:08:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why it is Ok to Pay to Pitch</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/why-it-is-ok-to-pay-to-pitch/#comment-19906572</link><description>Agreed that there is a lot of downright horrible groups out there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't buy that it can't be done right though.  Perhaps my event organizer hat is on too tight.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:17:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why it is Ok to Pay to Pitch</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/why-it-is-ok-to-pay-to-pitch/#comment-19906495</link><description>Really a hard story to read.  I don't think events like these make any sense, and hurt a lot of people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still, for some reason, think it can be done right.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:16:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why it is Ok to Pay to Pitch</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/why-it-is-ok-to-pay-to-pitch/#comment-19906285</link><description>I really can't tell if this is spam or not.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:13:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why it is Ok to Pay to Pitch</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/why-it-is-ok-to-pay-to-pitch/#comment-19906267</link><description>I think it can be done right, don't see many doing it really well but I think that it could be done.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:12:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why it is Ok to Pay to Pitch</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/why-it-is-ok-to-pay-to-pitch/#comment-19906201</link><description>-&amp;gt; When I see people wanting to charge startups to pitch, that *screams* to me that their first priority isn't to help out entrepreneurs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Agreed, I wonder why there isn't anyone doing these types of events with an entrip slant / leaning.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:11:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GeniusRocket: Toxic Environments and Startups</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/geniusrocket-toxic-environments-and-startups/#comment-19679537</link><description>I think there is room for $300 logos, but not even an inch for spec.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:15:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spec Work Is Evil / Why I Hate CrowdSpring | Andrew Hyde - Humble Yet Bold</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/spec-work-is-evil-why-i-hate-crowdspring/#comment-19677440</link><description>Yes, we should look at the positives of pollution.  Someone has to make a buck on the cleanup?  That is horrid logic, ethics and a way to live life.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Croudspring's traffic has been flat, which proves both that the model is not sustainable and that it isn't evolution at all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:40:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PREVIEW: Tweetie 2.0 for iPhone [Pics]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/28/tweetie-2-0/#comment-17743358</link><description>I love tweetie, can't wait for any new features.  The perfect mix of light vs. useful.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:58:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dustin Henderlong</title><link>http://dustinhenderlong.com/post/195880584#comment-17304139</link><description>really well done...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:49:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GeniusRocket: Toxic Environments and Startups</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/geniusrocket-toxic-environments-and-startups/#comment-17048914</link><description>hmmmmm... grey area there, but that is ok.  I can't quite seem to understand the whole model.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it sustainable?  If everyone did it, would it still work?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We love startups btw, no matter what program / who funded you.  The more strong and sustainable ones, the better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:24:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Shape of My Game</title><link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-shape-of-my-game/#comment-16862820</link><description>Amazing how random and fulfilling our lives can be on the road.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You wake up in NYC...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:54:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ignite Boulder 6 Thoughts</title><link>http://andrewhyde.net/ignite-boulder-6-thoughts/#comment-16862132</link><description>40 minute intermission was actually 45 minutes.  Sorry they missed it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewhyde</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:16:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>