<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for alistairpott</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/alistairpott/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/alistairpott/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:36:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why are humans (mostly) hairless?</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2009/09/21/why-are-humans-mostly-hairless/#comment-150931237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great comment and interesting point. I suspect that our remaining hairs do provide an advantage through tactile perception.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The obvious question though is why only humans? If the thin coat were such an advantage why would (pretty much) only humans have evolved this approach?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since only humans evolved this trait there must be another factor that is not taken into account in your theory. Even in warm climates other land mammals have thick coats rather than taking advantage of your theory. Why?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This suggests that the theory that humans evolved a thinner coat for increased tactile perception is at best incomplete.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:36:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Purpose of Life</title><link>https://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/03/30/purpose-of-life/#comment-126744166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is interesting that this passage essentially states that the purpose of human life is reproduction. That said, it is of course merely a statement without any grounding or reasoning. Just a statement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 05:07:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-123455774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Power Balance has issued a "corrective advertisement" admitting that their advertising is wrong. You can check out the ad here: &lt;a href="http://www.powerbalance.com/australia/ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.powerbalance.com/australia/ca"&gt;http://www.powerbalance.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the ad they state that "We admit that there is no credible scientific evidence that supports our claims and therefore we engaged in misleading conduct". They are also offering a refund!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 07:37:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-98868127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In fact, as the blog post above states, it has been proven that Powerbalance doesn't work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No matter how many colours you have!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:51:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-82898362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm afraid that the amount of nonsense in your post leads one to suspect that you have a vested interest in these toys. The original post stands: every properly conducted scientific test has shown Power Balance does NOT work. If you refute that, send us a link to the results and methods of a real study.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:19:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-78541990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because they're getting paid to. Or they also fall for it. Just because other people have fallen for something doesn't make it true. It is a fake...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:03:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-78541776</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As explained above, that is not a valid test... It proves nothing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:01:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I witnessed a suicide on Table Mountain</title><link>https://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/18/i-witnessed-a-suicide-on-table-mountain/#comment-72904511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In one of the most incredible coincidences of my life I've just bumped into Micharel (the British tourist from the story above) in La Paz, Bolivia. His beard has grown a lot since that day on Table Mountain, but I still recognized him in the bar of the Loki hostel here in La Paz.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:54:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-72483533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Remember:&lt;br&gt;1. You and your father must not know which bracelet is on when you do the tests.&lt;br&gt;2. Do the tests several times in order to find a real effect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:16:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-70249410</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can explain it. The placebo effect in combination with clever tricks. The order of the tests seems to make a difference as well as the placebo effect  discussed above.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The point is, that Power Balance has been shown to be no more effective than a rubber band. I'm afraid that your flawed tests prove absolutely nothing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:30:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-70246978</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A proper test on a sample of people would detect an effect even if only a few people feel the effect. In this case it does NOT because there is NO EFFECT more significant than placebo.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Julius Malema should not have been convicted of hate speech</title><link>https://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/03/16/julius-malema-should-not-have-been-convicted-of-hate-speech/#comment-63688054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I agree that Malema should have a platform I hate that you have grouped him with great men like Mandela and Tambo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Malema is a populist, racist buffoon. Despite that he still deserves freedom of speech.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:31:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-63687088</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You obviously didn't read the blog post. I describe seeing it used and running a very basic double blind test. The results show that the 'power balance tests' are rigged.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It appears to work, but in fact it is a trick.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:22:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-63686033</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no difference as the real power balance does nothing. You may as well just wear an elastic band around your wrist&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:17:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-63685734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You obviously didn't read the blog post. The tests are rigged as any properly conducted test shows and has shown.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I must admit that I find it frustrating that so many power balance salesmen/converts come onto this post and comment without reading the post itself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:14:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-61755307</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just to be clear. There may be a placebo effect, but the tests are rigged to show a favorable result for Power Balance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Furthermore, the fact that the placebo effect may be effective does not mean that Power Balance is not rubbish. It is absolute rubbish and works no better than prayer or kissing a smurf or any other superstitious plays.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:43:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-58382280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BS. Power Balance has been experimentally shown to be rubbish. You may be able to find specific cases where it 'seems' to work. Trust me it does not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have personally seen this to be the case.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:24:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Purpose of Life</title><link>https://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/03/30/purpose-of-life/#comment-53236475</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Even if there was a 'Creator' just because it created us doesn't mean that the purpose of life is to glorify it. That isn't logical...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 09:36:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Purpose of Life</title><link>https://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/03/30/purpose-of-life/#comment-44406534</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. But what to choose as a personal purpose and how to believe in it when you know that it is all just atoms floating about...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 03:32:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Balance is rubbish</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/06/power-balance-is-rubbish/#comment-41176032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome reply. I woulda replied with some detailed, longer message showing how his logic is faulty and suggesting an affiliation with power balance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You said it all in one word!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:48:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using raw SQL in django</title><link>http://blog.doughellmann.com/2007/12/using-raw-sql-in-django.html#comment-37786788</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is great, thanks. Hit the same problem today and this is a good solution.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:10:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marie Claire extra-naked issue</title><link>https://alistairpott.com/blog/2010/01/22/marie-claire-extra-naked-issue/#comment-30868558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Edited to remove references to "paunch" which I believe is unfair.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:41:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trapped in a coma for 23 years</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2009/11/23/trapped-in-a-coma-for-23-years/#comment-24017125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a discussion from Wired. Seems that he is at least partially conscious.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/11/houben-communication/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/11/houben-communication/"&gt;http://www.wired.com/wireds...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:33:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trapped in a coma for 23 years</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2009/11/23/trapped-in-a-coma-for-23-years/#comment-23940634</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There has been some excellent debate on this story on reddit. Many people believe that this man is indeed in a coma and that the consciousness and communication is being faked.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read all the comments: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/4FfCcS" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/4FfCcS"&gt;http://bit.ly/4FfCcS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is also some excellent information from someone who periodically suffers from locked-in syndrome. He talks about how he is &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; misdiagnosed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://bit.ly/5QcQTz" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/5QcQTz"&gt;http://bit.ly/5QcQTz&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:56:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guido Fawkes &amp;#8211; A Summary</title><link>https://alistairpott.com/blog/2009/11/10/guido-fawkes-a-summary/#comment-23858161</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I did mean to say that... Thanks for the heads up. I've updated the post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistairpott</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:32:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>