<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for alexebel</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/alexebel/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:40:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Ebels Entdeckungen</title><link>http://entdeckt.disqus.com/ebels_entdeckungen_928/#comment-4013711</link><description>Nanu? Das ist ja mittlerweile ein ganz anderes Video?!?!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alexebel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:40:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 30 FriendFeed Users Based on Google Ranking</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.disqus.com/top_30_friendfeed_users_based_on_google_ranking/#comment-795680</link><description>"... some people made the point that this just searches for who is using the term "friendfeed" most (which seems the main reason why Scoble and Gray made the top besides they're heavy users)!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i dont think that it's as simple as that, with a test i ran.  i'll give it more time though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sull</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:35:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 30 FriendFeed Users Based on Google Ranking</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.disqus.com/top_30_friendfeed_users_based_on_google_ranking/#comment-782773</link><description>Alexander,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, I agree that there are other methods that can be used to create ranking lists. I was just having fun with this. Your method seems better &amp; Mitchell Tsai has also written about using Google page counts &lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com/e/3d2ed53c-1a34-49a2-a0cd-877c4c679e60/Top-FriendFeed-Users-by-number-of-pages-on/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. I'm glad that this post has created some dialog on using other ranking methods and I look forward to watching what others create.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">krynsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:30:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 30 FriendFeed Users Based on Google Ranking</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.disqus.com/top_30_friendfeed_users_based_on_google_ranking/#comment-781324</link><description>I adopted this idea to get the "Top 30 german-writing friendfeed users" by just restricting the search to language=german:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://intelligentesleben.blogspot.com/2008/06/die-top-30-der-deutschsprachigen_29.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://intelligentesleben.blogspot.com/2008/06/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But in the discussion on friendfeed ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com/e/d10fa425-a662-63ac-f59c-594258203605/Die-Top-30-der-deutschsprachigen-Friendfeed/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://friendfeed.com/e/d10fa425-a662-63ac-f59c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;... some people made the point that this just searches for who is using the term "friendfeed" most (which seems the main reason why Scoble and Gray made the top besides they're heavy users)! Is there any reason you left this term in? Wouldn't it be better to do the search just for the domain &lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;friendfeed.com&lt;/a&gt; without any specific term at all?&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;as_q=&amp;as_epq=&amp;as_oq=&amp;as_eq=&amp;num=100&amp;lr=&amp;as_filetype=&amp;ft=i&amp;as_sitesearch=friendfeed.com&amp;as_qdr=all&amp;as_rights=&amp;as_occt=any&amp;cr=&amp;as_nlo=&amp;as_nhi=&amp;safe=images" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;as_q=&amp;as_epq...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alexebel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:26:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>