<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for aidanhenry</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/aidanhenry/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:10:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/linkedin_and_facebook_collision_course_19/#comment-31254</link><description>So maybe LinkedIn users are from Mars, and Facebook users are from Venus?  :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For some reason, I keep thinking of Research In Motion when I think of&lt;br&gt;LinkedIn -- RIM is a company that was very successful focusing&lt;br&gt;strictly on the business user, but eventually started to move more&lt;br&gt;toward the non-business or consumer user, more or less out of&lt;br&gt;necessity. I have a feeling LinkedIn is doing (or will do) the same.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But how will die-hard LinkedIn users respond? For every one that likes&lt;br&gt;the more social features, there will be some who liked it better the&lt;br&gt;way it was.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:10:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/linkedin_and_facebook_collision_course_19/#comment-31245</link><description>Mathew,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm in the same boat as you. I barely use LinkedIn. I use Facebook almost exclusively. Nearly all of my friends and colleagues use FB, and I find it much more productive and less confusing than LinkedIn.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although I do like the new changes, it's highly unlikely that I'm going to cross over or devote any more time to LinkedIn at this point. I do agree with Ryan's point, however, that certain industries are more suited to leverage LinkedIn than others...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Aidan&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.MappingTheWeb.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.MappingTheWeb.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aidanhenry</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:04:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fiddy Cent on P2P: Artists need to deal</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/fiddy_cent_on_p2p_artists_need_to_deal_48/#comment-30904</link><description>That's about the smartest thing I've ever heard a hardcore gangster rapper ever say...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Aidan&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.MappingTheWeb.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.MappingTheWeb.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aidanhenry</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:02:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey gang, let&amp;#8217;s head to Coke Island!</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/hey_gang_let8217s_head_to_coke_island_63/#comment-29802</link><description>That's a different Coke Island, Aidan  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 09:46:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey gang, let&amp;#8217;s head to Coke Island!</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/hey_gang_let8217s_head_to_coke_island_63/#comment-29747</link><description>... and I clicked hoping to find a post about the exciting world of blogging, drugs, and exotic places...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Aidan&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.MappingTheWeb.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.MappingTheWeb.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aidanhenry</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:29:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Google crowdsourcing? Not quite</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/is_google_crowdsourcing_not_quite_90/#comment-22423</link><description>I agree, Aidan. That's kind of what I had in mind as well. I just&lt;br&gt;don't see Google mucking with the main index, for the reasons you&lt;br&gt;describe.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:44:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Google crowdsourcing? Not quite</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/is_google_crowdsourcing_not_quite_90/#comment-22381</link><description>By adding any kind of 'opinion' to search kills its ability to remain subjective. Furthermore, it increases the likelihood of gaming by the scum of the Internet. I highly doubt (maybe 0% chance or so) that Google would ever choose this route.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only thing I can see working is a situation where you can "vote" your OWN results up and down, so that Google can adapt to your behavioural patterns and results should become more relevant. Of course, this would have no effect on the searches of others though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Aidan&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.MappingTheWeb.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.MappingTheWeb.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aidanhenry</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:50:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>