<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for aidanhenry</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-a6e62452" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/aidanhenry/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:04:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: LinkedIn and Facebook: Collision course?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/10/linkedin-and-facebook-collision-course/#comment-31245</link><description>Mathew,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm in the same boat as you. I barely use LinkedIn. I use Facebook almost exclusively. Nearly all of my friends and colleagues use FB, and I find it much more productive and less confusing than LinkedIn.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although I do like the new changes, it's highly unlikely that I'm going to cross over or devote any more time to LinkedIn at this point. I do agree with Ryan's point, however, that certain industries are more suited to leverage LinkedIn than others...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Aidan&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.MappingTheWeb.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.MappingTheWeb.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aidanhenry</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:04:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fiddy Cent on P2P: Artists need to deal</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/09/fiddy-cent-on-p2p-artists-need-to-deal/#comment-30904</link><description>That's about the smartest thing I've ever heard a hardcore gangster rapper ever say...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Aidan&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.MappingTheWeb.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.MappingTheWeb.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aidanhenry</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:02:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey gang, let&amp;#8217;s head to Coke Island!</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/07/hey-gang-lets-head-to-coke-island/#comment-29747</link><description>... and I clicked hoping to find a post about the exciting world of blogging, drugs, and exotic places...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Aidan&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.MappingTheWeb.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.MappingTheWeb.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aidanhenry</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:29:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Google crowdsourcing? Not quite</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/29/is-google-crowdsourcing-not-quite/#comment-22381</link><description>By adding any kind of 'opinion' to search kills its ability to remain subjective. Furthermore, it increases the likelihood of gaming by the scum of the Internet. I highly doubt (maybe 0% chance or so) that Google would ever choose this route.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only thing I can see working is a situation where you can "vote" your OWN results up and down, so that Google can adapt to your behavioural patterns and results should become more relevant. Of course, this would have no effect on the searches of others though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Aidan&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.MappingTheWeb.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.MappingTheWeb.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aidanhenry</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:50:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>