<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for affiliatetip</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/affiliatetip/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:44:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Rewarding Top Affiliates</title><link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/rewarding-top-affiliates/#comment-1901699</link><description>Hi Melvin -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not sure what happened - that's definitely the URL where I read it an hour ago, but I'm getting the same error now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry about that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:44:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real Time</title><link>http://www.samharrelson.com/2008/08/28/real-time/#comment-1898792</link><description>Did I miss some case studies that proved a real time response move the needle?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:28:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real Time</title><link>http://www.samharrelson.com/2008/08/28/real-time/#comment-1897311</link><description>Yet again, we'll have to agree to disagree on your conception of "hard  &lt;br&gt;facts" and "lacking."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.samharrelson.com/2008/08/28/real-time/</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:50:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real Time</title><link>http://www.samharrelson.com/2008/08/28/real-time/#comment-1896801</link><description>I read the entire article, and nothing there indicated to me that real time  makes a marked difference over a response delayed by an hour.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are theories and opinions, but hard facts are lacking.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:43:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real Time</title><link>http://www.samharrelson.com/2008/08/28/real-time/#comment-1896236</link><description>look at the example above with Weezer or think how marketers can (and  &lt;br&gt;do) engage people with real time info when they express interest or  &lt;br&gt;concern over a particular keyword.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.samharrelson.com/2008/08/28/real-time/</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:25:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real Time</title><link>http://www.samharrelson.com/2008/08/28/real-time/#comment-1896168</link><description>Please provide data to support that assertion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't see how a response that was an hour faster would have garnered a better response for Comcast in this situation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:21:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real Time</title><link>http://www.samharrelson.com/2008/08/28/real-time/#comment-1896117</link><description>nope, not bad for a start.  however, the shorter the latency the  &lt;br&gt;greater the value.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.samharrelson.com/2008/08/28/real-time/</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:18:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real Time</title><link>http://www.samharrelson.com/2008/08/28/real-time/#comment-1896050</link><description>I think real time sounds great in theory, but I'll give you an example of a big impact via Twitter where real time was immaterial.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I posted a message about Comcast on Twitter, and got a response 74 minutes later.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That turnaround could easily have been achieved by monitoring RSS feeds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyhow, it was considered so significant that a company got back to me that fast that it made national news.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Examples from Philadelphia and Los Angeles...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://cbs3.com/seenon/3.On.Your.2.798935.html"&gt;http://cbs3.com/seenon/3.On.Your.2.798935.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/consumer&amp;id=6326500"&gt;http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not bad for a latency of more than an hour.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:14:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GeekCast 33: Super Savvy Sans Sam</title><link>http://geekcast.fm/archives/geekcast-33-super-savvy-sans-sam/#comment-1876302</link><description>Lisa's level is always lower than ours. Other than that, fine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://geekcast.fm/archives/geekcast-33-super-savvy-sans-sam/</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:03:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GeekCast 33: Super Savvy Sans Sam</title><link>http://geekcast.fm/archives/geekcast-33-super-savvy-sans-sam/#comment-1876268</link><description>Maybe we should sell it on iTunes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So the sound is normal for you? Lisa said it sounded funny for her.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:00:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/affiliate-summit-2008-east-attendee-details/</title><link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/affiliate-summit-2008-east-attendee-details/#comment-1856947</link><description>Thanks Debby - I would be very happy to continue the trend at this pace. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:02:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seth Godin Advocates Click Fraud</title><link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/seth-godin-advocates-click-fraud/#comment-1826065</link><description>Not really correct either, I'm not a marketer so I actually don't have  a clue about this topic--but I do dare to state that the ones that spend $100,000 on an online ad campaign don't expect 100% of the clicks to be from people that is going to make a buy...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/seth-godin-advocates-click-fraud/</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/geekcast-32-never-trust-anybody-over-30/</title><link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/geekcast-32-never-trust-anybody-over-30/#comment-1824032</link><description>I'm afraid we don't have the resources to produce transcripts - it's a non-sponsored podcast that we do for fun, so we don't have a budget for that sort of thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The closest thing to a summary is just what I put in the blog posts to recap the items discussed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:51:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Niche Marketing: Your Product + &amp;#8220;What&amp;#8217;s Hot&amp;#8221; = Success</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/niche-marketing-your-product-whats-hot-success/#comment-1821585</link><description>Bad packaging on their end. I include two hair clips with every purchase.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shmuly</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:57:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seth Godin Advocates Click Fraud</title><link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/seth-godin-advocates-click-fraud/#comment-1821571</link><description>In cases where it's not pay-per-click, such a practice would benefit nobody, but it would be detrimental to the advertiser and publisher, as it would artificially inflate the clicks for ads.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:55:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seth Godin Advocates Click Fraud</title><link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/seth-godin-advocates-click-fraud/#comment-1821561</link><description>I worked on the advertiser side for 10 years, so you can save the sanctimony.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A more appropriate analogy with magazines would be if you ripped out a random ad from a magazine at the doctors office to show your misdirected appreciation of the content.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:53:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/automated-image-feeds-for-affiliate-marketers/</title><link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/automated-image-feeds-for-affiliate-marketers/#comment-1821209</link><description>I guess you just did make such a comment. Hopefully they'll reach out to you directly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:22:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Niche Marketing: Your Product + &amp;#8220;What&amp;#8217;s Hot&amp;#8221; = Success</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/niche-marketing-your-product-whats-hot-success/#comment-1795354</link><description>Yeah, they didn't give us any, so it was just sort of floating and teasing the top of my head.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:30:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Niche Marketing: Your Product + &amp;#8220;What&amp;#8217;s Hot&amp;#8221; = Success</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/niche-marketing-your-product-whats-hot-success/#comment-1794386</link><description>Shawn, two words: hair clips!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shmuly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:31:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seth Godin Advocates Click Fraud</title><link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/seth-godin-advocates-click-fraud/#comment-1778521</link><description>Content ads are never as targeted as search advertising for that reason.  You're 'buying' a curious prospect's momentary attention with your ad.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My thoughts on this are in a longer blog post at:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://guydz.com/moneypowerwisdom/seth-godin-tips-the-jar/"&gt;http://guydz.com/moneypowerwisdom/seth-godin-ti...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All success&lt;br&gt;Dr.Mani</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dr.Mani</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:04:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: eBay Advanced Creatives for Affiliates</title><link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/ebay-advanced-creatives-for-affiliates/#comment-1764416</link><description>I've read that they are using a formula to determine max ROI, and affiliates not coming out with the right numbers are getting cut.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike1115</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:06:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: eBay Advanced Creatives for Affiliates</title><link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/ebay-advanced-creatives-for-affiliates/#comment-1762935</link><description>What was the reason? I didn't hear about it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 05:46:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Niche Marketing: Your Product + &amp;#8220;What&amp;#8217;s Hot&amp;#8221; = Success</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/niche-marketing-your-product-whats-hot-success/#comment-1753327</link><description>I wore one for a wedding many years ago and it always felt like it was going to fall off - I can't convert just because of that. I'm used to the baseball cap fit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 03:37:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Niche Marketing: Your Product + &amp;#8220;What&amp;#8217;s Hot&amp;#8221; = Success</title><link>http://www.jimkukral.com/niche-marketing-your-product-whats-hot-success/#comment-1738768</link><description>If I had one in my possession, I would have. Alas, Shmuly didn't send me one. What, you're not entering to win it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.jimkukral.com/niche-marketing-your-product-whats-hot-success/</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 01:47:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seth Godin Advocates Click Fraud</title><link>http://blog.affiliatetip.com/archives/seth-godin-advocates-click-fraud/#comment-1736828</link><description>I have no intention of buying a BMW anytime soon, but I like their ads and I read them in magazines. When out browsing the web, if I stumble across an interesting ad (even with no intention of buying the product) I click on the ad because the ad itself may be interesting/fun.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, I really do not see how you can differentiate this from "clicking to show support." They both result in no sale for the advertiser.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lr</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:50:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>