<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for John Fisher</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/afb4cb2ffac9edb9e2a3917eb0afa50c/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:07:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Public Broadcasting&amp;#8217;s Platforms for Interaction</title><link>http://toddmundt.disqus.com/public_broadcasting8217s_platforms_for_interaction/#comment-1493003</link><description>I found this while looking for a BBS about NPR. I think your points are good, and it's interesting to get a bit of the insider's view. I might write a piece on my own blog... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think NPR needs an external source of comment. It's fine to run a letters-to-the-editor online, but there should be an independent source of criticism. My cohorts and I have been complaining of declining NPR quality for years, and I see very little space to discuss it online. In fact I think every media-source people care about ought to have a watchdog. In my case that would also include the LA Times, which has Truthdig.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If there is such a site for NPR I'd like to hear of it. Else I may get frustrated and start one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Fisher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:07:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>