Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
matty
Is this you? Claim Profile »
9 months ago
in Crobar BoraMusic Housecast Episode 69: Sasha on BoraMag
Sasha Tracklist
1- Home Video - That You Might (Sasha Invol2ver Edit)
2- Petar Dundov - Oasis
3- Ladytron - Destroy Everything You Touch (Sasha Invol2ver Edit)
4- Energy 52 - Cafe Del Mar (Oliver Lang Remix)
5- Smith N Hack - Falling Stars
6- ITO & Ran Shani - Aviation
1- Home Video - That You Might (Sasha Invol2ver Edit)
2- Petar Dundov - Oasis
3- Ladytron - Destroy Everything You Touch (Sasha Invol2ver Edit)
4- Energy 52 - Cafe Del Mar (Oliver Lang Remix)
5- Smith N Hack - Falling Stars
6- ITO & Ran Shani - Aviation
11 months ago
in ‘Safe’ seat or no, Ellison works at community outreach on The Minnesota Independent
I attended the meeting on Saturday. I was impressed with the care Keith Ellison took to listen to people. When there was something said he felt was important, he made sure a staff person made a note for future reference. He is obviously a caring and sensible person, a good combination.
Matty
Matty
4 years ago
in IE sets Alt-ernative standard — Elliott C. Back on Elliott Back's Blog
What's funny to me is -- WHO are you trying to convert? There's a distinct lack of "on the fence" users.
Those who don't care about their browsing experiences or are too naive to know better use IE.
Those who care about their browsing experiences or have lots of computer experience use something else. In fact, the more experience a user has, the more likely they don't run windows at all.
When experienced users of any kind of system do something, that's the thing to do. Most don't bash other options, they just ignore them.
I think the difference here is, computer professionals are frustrated by the work IE creates for them. IT people are sick of wasting time cleaning up spyware infections on users' PCs, so they badmouth the culprit, IE or the insecure OS.
Defending IE as something better than the alternatives is what we used to call "unlikely insistence" and my guess would be you're paid directly or indirectly to do it. Nothing else makes sense.
Those who don't care about their browsing experiences or are too naive to know better use IE.
Those who care about their browsing experiences or have lots of computer experience use something else. In fact, the more experience a user has, the more likely they don't run windows at all.
When experienced users of any kind of system do something, that's the thing to do. Most don't bash other options, they just ignore them.
I think the difference here is, computer professionals are frustrated by the work IE creates for them. IT people are sick of wasting time cleaning up spyware infections on users' PCs, so they badmouth the culprit, IE or the insecure OS.
Defending IE as something better than the alternatives is what we used to call "unlikely insistence" and my guess would be you're paid directly or indirectly to do it. Nothing else makes sense.